195 U.S. 418 (1904) UNITED STATES v. THOMAS. THOMAS v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 94, 95. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 11, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *419 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt, with whom Mr. John Q. Thompson, Special Assistant Attorney, was on the brief, for the United States. Mr. George A. King and Mr. William B. King for Charles M. Thomas. MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the...
195 U.S. 540 (1904) WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY et al. Nos. 89, 199. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 19, 20, 1904. Decided December 12, 1904. APPEAL FROM AND ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. *547 Mr. John F. Dillon, Mr. Rush Taggart and Mr. Henry D. Estabrook, with whom Mr. Richard Vliet Lindabury was on the brief, for appellant and petitioner. Mr. John G. Johnson for appellees and respondents in Nos....
192 U.S. 116 (1904) CHARLES McINTIRE v. EDWIN A. McINTIRE. EDWIN A. McINTIRE v. CHARLES McINTIRE. Nos. 84, 85. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 8, 1903. Decided January 4, 1904. APPEALS FROM, AND IN ERROR TO, THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *117 Mr. William G. Johnson for Charles McIntire. Mr. William Henry Dennis and Mr. Charles Cowles Tucker, with whom Mr. Henry E. Davis was on the brief, for the administrator c.t.a.. *119 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the...
193 U.S. 614 (1904) SLOAN v. UNITED STATES. No. 453. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 16, 17, 1904. Decided April 4, 1904. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Mr. Thomas L. Sloan, with whom Mr. Charles E. Clapp and Mr. H.C. Brown were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. John L. Webster, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt and Mr. W.S. Summers were on the brief, for appellee. MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM delivered the opinion of the court. These are...
193 U.S. 146 (1904) GILES v. TEASLEY, BOARD OF REGISTRARS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA. GILES v. TEASLEY. Nos. 337, 338. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 5, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. *151 Mr. Wilford H. Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. William A. Gunter for defendant in error. *160 MR. JUSTICE DAY, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The right to review in this court the judgment of...
193 U.S. 115 (1904) UNITED STATES v. THE CHOCTAW NATION AND THE CHICKASAW NATION. THE CHICKASAW FREEDMEN v. THE CHOCTAW NATION AND THE CHICKASAW NATION. Nos. 322, 323. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 26, 27, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *123 Mr. Charles W. Needham for the Chickasaw Freedmen. Mr. George A. Mansfield and Mr. A.A. Hoehling, Jr., for the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt for the United States. MR....
196 U.S. 1 (1904) JOHNSON v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 32, 87. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 31, 1904. Decided December 19, 1904. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *2 Mr. W.L. Maginnis, with whom Mr. L.A. Shaver and Mr. John M. Gitterman were on the brief, for petitioner and plaintiff in error. Mr. Maxwell Evarts, with whom Mr. Martin L. Clardy and Mr. Henry G. Herbel, were on the brief, for respondent and defendant...
193 U.S. 517 (1904) TOM HONG, alias HOM POE, v. UNITED STATES. TOM DOCK, alias HOM DOCK, v. UNITED STATES. LEE KIT v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 310, 311, 313. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 12, 1904. Decided March 21, 1904. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. *519 Mr. Terence J. McManus, with whom Mr. Frank S. Black and Mr. Russell H. Landale were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Max J. Kohler, by leave of the court, filed a...
193 U.S. 65 (1904) AH HOW alias LOUIE AH HOW v. UNITED STATES. CHU DO alias CHU GEE v. UNITED STATES. LEW GUEY v. UNITED STATES. YUNG LEE v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 307, 308, 309, 312. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 12, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Mr. Terence J. McManus, with whom Mr. Frank S. Black and Mr. Russell H. Landale were on the brief, for appellants in these cases and also in...
195 U.S. 194 25 S. Ct. 3 49 L. Ed. 154 ANDREW J. AIKENS, Plff. in Err. , v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. NO 3. ALBERT HUEGIN, Plff. in Err. , v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. NO 4. MELVIN A. HOYT, Plff. in Err. , v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. NO 5. Nos. 3, 4, 5. Argued and submitted October 21, 22, 1903. Ordered for reargument. May 31, 1904. Reargued and Submitted October 17, 18, 1904. Decided November 7, 1904. Messrs. W. H. Timlin and George D. Van Dyke for plaintiff in error in Nos. 3 and 4. [Argument of Counsel from...
195 U.S. 65 (1904) SCHICK v. UNITED STATES. BROADWELL v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 222, 223. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 2, 1903. Decided May 31, 1904. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Mr. Willim D. Guthrie and Mr. Miller Outcalt, with whom Mr. Charles E. Prior, Mr. Francis J. Kearful, Mr. Delavan B. Cole and Mr. Charles C. Carnahan were on the brief for plaintiff in error. [1] Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the United States....
194 U.S. 618 (1904) FIELD v. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY. BARBER ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY v. FIELD. Nos. 201, 202. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 11, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. *619 Mr. Richard H. Field, attorney in person, for appellant in No. 201, and appellee in No. 202. *620 Mr. William C. Scarritt, with whom Mr. John K. Griffith, Mr. Elliott H. Jones and Mr. Edward L. Scarritt were on...
193 U.S. 528 (1904) UNITED STATES v. JONES. UNITED STATES v. GILDERSLEEVE. UNITED STATES v. WHEELER. WHEELER v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 197, 198, 199, 525. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted March 18, 1904. Decided April 4, 1904. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. Philip M. Ashford, for appellant. Mr. George A. King and Mr. William B. King for the appellees. Mr. Charles C. Lancaster, for Wheeler, appellee. *529 THE CHIEF JUSTICE: These are appeals...
195 U.S. 276 (1904) FAYERWEATHER v. RITCH. REYNOLDS v. RITCH. Nos. 157, 158. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 12, 13, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. *288 Mr. Roger M. Sherman for appellant in No. 157 and Mr. William Blaikie for appellant in No. 158. Mr. Charles Andrews submitted a brief for appellants in Nos. 157 and 158. Mr. Elihu Root, with whom Mr. James L. Bishop, Mr. William Forse...
192 U.S. 243 (1904) COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK v. WEINHARD. SAME v. WILLIAMS. Nos. 109, 110. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 17, 1903. Decided January 18, 1904. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. *246 Mr. E.S. Pillsbury for plaintiff in error. Mr. Thomas O'Day, with whom Mr. George H. Williams and Mr. George W. Durham were on the brief, for defendants in error. MR. JUSTICE DAY, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. This case...
192 U.S. 94 (1904) JOPLIN v. CHACHERE. No. 96. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 16, 1903. Decided January 4, 1904. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. *96 *97 Mr. S.D. McEnery, with whom Mr. George S. Dodds and Mr. Mark M. Boatner were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. *98 Mr. G.L. Dupre, with whom Mr. E.D. Saunders was on the brief, for defendant in error. *100 MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court....
192 U.S. 16 (1904) SINCLAIR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 94. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 14, 1903. Decided January 4, 1904. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Mr. C.C. Cole and Mr. J.J. Darlington for plaintiff in error. Submitted for defendant in error by Mr. A.B. Duvall and Mr. Edward H. Thomas. *17 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court. Plaintiff in error was prosecuted by information in the Police Court of the District of...
192 U.S. 64 (1904) POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE CO. v. TAYLOR. No. 93. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 11, 1903. Decided January 4, 1904. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. *67 Mr. Frank R. Shattuck for plaintiff in error. Mr. John M. Harris, with whom Mr. E.O. Wagenhorst was on the brief, for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court. The grounds of our jurisdiction to review the...
192 U.S. 55 (1904) POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE CO v. NEW HOPE. No. 92. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 11, 1903. Decided January 4, 1904. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. *60 Mr. Frank R. Shattuck for plaintiff in error. Mr. William C. Ryan for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court. The ground upon which an ordinance of this nature may be upheld is stated in the two cases of...
192 U.S. 21 (1904) STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. KNIGHT. No. 91. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 11, 1903. Decided January 4, 1904. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. *22 Mr. Henry Galbraith Ward, with whom Mr. A. Leo Everett was on the brief for plaintiff in error. *25 Mr. John Cunneen, Attorney General of the State of New York, for defendant in error. *24 MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the...
