Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Armour Packing Co. v. United States, Nos. 467, 468, 469, 470 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 16, 1908

209 U.S. 56 (1908) ARMOUR PACKING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SWIFT AND COMPANY v. SAME. MORRIS AND COMPANY v. SAME. CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 467, 468, 469, 470. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 20, 21, 22, 1908. Decided March 16, 1908. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *58 Mr. Frank Hagerman and Mr. J.C. Cowin, with whom Mr. A.R. Urion, Mr. Henry Veeder and Mr. M.W. Borders were on the brief, for petitioners. The Attorney General, Mr....

# 1
United States v. Sisseton and Wahpeton Bands of Sioux Indians, Nos. 338, 339 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1908

208 U.S. 561 (1908) UNITED STATES v. SISSETON AND WAHPETON BANDS OF SIOUX INDIANS. SISSETON AND WAHPETON BANDS OF SIOUX INDIANS v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 338, 339. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 7, 8, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Mr. George M. Anderson, with whom Mr. Assistant Attorney General Thompson was on the brief, for the United States. Mr. William H. Robeson and Mr. Marion Butler, with whom Mr. Charles A. Maxwell, Mr. George S. Chase and...

# 2
Harriman v. ICC, Nos. 315, 316, 317 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 14, 1908

211 U.S. 407 (1908) HARRIMAN v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. KAHN v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. HARRIMAN. Nos. 315, 316, 317. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 3, 4, 1908. Decided December 14, 1908. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. *408 Mr. John C. Spooner and Mr. John G. Milburn, with whom Mr. Robert S. Lovett was on the brief, for Edward H. Harriman. *410 Mr. Walker D. Hines, with...

# 3
Robert R. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Company, Nos. 270-275 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 30, 1908

211 U.S. 210 29 S. Ct. 67 53 L. Ed. 150 ROBERT R. PRENTIS, Henry C. Stuart, and Joseph E. Willard, Individually and as Constituting the State Corporation Commission of Virginia, and R. T. Wilson, Clerk of the State Corporation Commission of Virginia, Appts., v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE COMPANY. NO 270. SAME, Appts., v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. NO 271. SAME, Appts., v. CHESAPEAKE WESTERN RAILWAY. NO 272. SAME, Appts., v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. NO 273. SAME, Appts., v....

# 4
Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. Allison, Nos. 249, 250 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 30, 1908

211 U.S. 264 (1908) GARFIELD, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. ALLISON. Nos. 249, 250. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 15, 18, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *265 The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Fowler, with whom Mr. William R. Harr was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles H. Merillat, with whom Mr. Charles J. Kappler and Mr. James K. Jones were on the brief, for...

# 5
The Employers'liability Cases, Nos. 216, 222 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 06, 1908

207 U.S. 463 (1908) THE EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY CASES. [1] Nos. 216, 222. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 10, 11, 12, 1907. Decided January 6, 1908. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AND THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. *464 Mr. William R. Harr for plaintiff in error in No. 216. Mr. J.E. Torrance, with whom Mr. S.C. Bloss, Mr. Geo. *465 Durelle and Mr. W.M. Smith were on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 222. Mr. J.M....

# 6
Scribner v. Straus, Nos. 204, 205 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 01, 1908

210 U.S. 352 (1908) SCRIBNER v. STRAUS et al., TRADING AS R.H. MACY & COMPANY. CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT, v. SAME. Nos. 204, 205. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 1908. Decided June 1, 1908. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. Stephen H. Olin, for appellants, submitted. Mr. John G. Carlisle, with whom Mr. Edmond E. Wise was on the brief, for appellees. MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court. These actions were...

# 7
St. Louis v. United Railways Co., Nos. 193, 194, 195 (1908)

210 U.S. 266 (1908) CITY OF ST. LOUIS v. UNITED RAILWAYS COMPANY. SAME v. ST. LOUIS AND SUBURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY. SAME v. ST. LOUIS AND MERAMEC RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. Nos. 193, 194, 195. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 20, 23, 1908. Decided May 18, 1908. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Mr. William F. Woerner, with whom Mr. Charles W. Bates was on the brief, for appellant. *269 Mr. Henry S. Priest, for appellees. *268 MR....

# 8
Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, T. & SFR Co., Nos. 178, 179 (1908)

210 U.S. 1 (1908) EMPIRE STATE CATTLE COMPANY v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. MINNESOTA AND DAKOTA CATTLE COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 178, 179. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 13, 16, 1908. Decided May 4, 1908. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *2 Mr. James S. Botsford, with whom Mr. Buckner F. Deatherage, Mr. Odus G. Young and Mr. R.E. Ball were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Gardiner Lathrop and Mr. Robert Dunlap, with whom Mr....

# 9
Ware & Leland v. Mobile County, Nos. 173, 174 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 06, 1908

209 U.S. 405 (1908) WARE AND LELAND v. MOBILE COUNTY. WARE AND LELAND v. STATE OF ALABAMA. Nos. 173, 174. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted March 10, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. Mr. Burwell Boykin Boone for plaintiffs in error. *406 MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court. These cases were submitted together and are in all respects similar, and involve the constitutional validity of subdivision 40 of an act of the...

# 10
Garzot v. De Rubio, Nos. 141, 142, 604 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 06, 1908

209 U.S. 283 (1908) GARZOT v. De RUBIO. BURSET v. SAME. BURSET v. SAME. Nos. 141, 142, 604. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 27, 28, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. Mr. N.B.K. Pettingill and Mr. George H. Lamar for appellants. *284 Mr. Francis H. Dexter and Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for appellee. MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court. These several appeals were taken by the various appellants from the...

# 11
White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co., Nos. 110, 111 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1908

209 U.S. 1 (1908) WHITE-SMITH MUSIC PUBLISHING COMPANY v. APOLLO COMPANY. Nos. 110, 111. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 16, 17, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. APPEALS FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *2 Mr. Livingston Gifford for appellant. Mr. Charles S. Burton and Mr. John J. O'Connell for appellee. By Mr. Nathan Burkan for Victor Herbert sustaining the contentions of the appellant. By Mr. Albert H. Walker for the Connorized Music...

# 12
Re Metropolitan Railway Receivership, Nos. 11, 12, Original (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 13, 1908

208 U.S. 90 (1908) Re METROPOLITAN RAILWAY RECEIVERSHIP. [1] Nos. 11, 12, Original. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 9, 1907. Decided January 13, 1908. PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS. *100 Mr. Roger Foster for petitioners. Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for the respondent in No. 11, Original. Mr. James Byrne for the respondent in No. 12, Original. *106 MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The petitioners base their application for...

# 13
Prosser v. Finn, No 64 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 13, 1908

208 U.S. 67 (1908) PROSSER v. FINN. No. 64. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 4, 1907. Decided January 13, 1908. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. *71 Mr. James H. Hayden, Mr. Robert C. Hayden and Mr. James B. Reavis for plaintiff in error. Mr. B.S. Grosscup for defendant in error. *72 MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. This case depends upon the construction to be given to ยง 452, Rev. Stat. If...

# 14
Loewe v. Lawlor, No 389 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 03, 1908

208 U.S. 274 (1908) LOEWE v. LAWLOR. No. 389. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 4, 5, 1907. Decided February 3, 1908. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *275 Mr. James M. Beck and Mr. Daniel Davenport for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John Kimberly Beach and Mr. John H. Light, with whom Mr. Robert DeForest and Mr. Howard W. Taylor were on the brief, for defendants in error. *283 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court. This was an...

# 15
Bennett v. Bennett, 98 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1908

208 U.S. 505 (1908) BENNETT v. BENNETT. No. 98. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 9, 10, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. *508 Mr. James R. Keaton, with whom Mr. John W. Shartel and Mr. Frank Wells were on the brief, for plaintiff in error and appellant. Mr. L.T. Michener, with whom Mr. John Embry and Mr. W.W. Dudley were on the brief, for defendant in error and appellee. *510 MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after...

# 16
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. Co. v. Vicksburg, 97 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 06, 1908

209 U.S. 358 (1908) THE YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. CITY OF VICKSBURG. No. 97. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 28, 1908. Decided April 6, 1908. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. Mr. Edward Mayes, with whom Mr. J.M. Dickinson was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Hannis Taylor, with whom Mr. George Anderson was on the brief, for appellees. *360 MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court. The...

# 17
Williamson v. United States, 96 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 06, 1908

207 U.S. 425 (1908) WILLIAMSON v. UNITED STATES. No. 96. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 5, 6, 1907. Decided January 6, 1908. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. *427 Mr. Charles A. Keigwin and Mr. Charles A. Douglas, with whom Mr. W.B. Matthews and Mr. E.B. Sherrill were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. *430 The Attorney General and Mr. William R. Harr, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom The Solicitor General was on...

# 18
Elder v. Wood, 95 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 27, 1908

208 U.S. 226 (1908) ELDER v. WOOD. No. 95. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 9, 1908. Decided January 27, 1908. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. Mr. George R. Elder for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Aldis B. Browne for defendants in error. Mr. Charles Cavender was on the brief. *230 MR. JUSTICE MOODY delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff in error brought this action in a District Court of the State of Colorado to recover from the defendants in error the...

# 19
Bluthenthal v. Jones, 94 (1908)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 06, 1908

208 U.S. 64 (1908) BLUTHENTHAL v. JONES. No. 94. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 18, 1907. Decided January 6, 1908. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Mr. Benjamin Z. Phillips and Mr. John M. Slaton for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Solon G. Wilson for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE MOODY delivered the opinion of the court. This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of Florida. The plaintiffs in error were judgment creditors of Miles C. Jones, the...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer