Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
ICC v. Goodrich Transit Co., Nos. 879, 880, 881, and 882 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 01, 1912

224 U.S. 194 (1912) INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. GOODRICH TRANSIT COMPANY. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. SAME. UNITED STATES v. WHITE STAR LINE. UNITED STATES v. SAME. Nos. 879, 880, 881, 882. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 20, 21, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. *195 Mr. Charles W. Needham for the Interstate Commerce Commission. Mr. James A. Fowler, Assistant to the Attorney General, *198 with whom Mr. Blackburn Esterline,...

# 1
Railroad Commission of Ohio, Appt. v. B. A. Worthington, Receiver of the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Company, Nos. 776 and 505, (1912)

225 U.S. 101 32 S. Ct. 653 56 L. Ed. 1004 RAILROAD COMMISSION OF OHIO, Appt., v. B. A. WORTHINGTON, Receiver of the Wheeling & Lake Erie Railroad Company. Nos. 776 and 505, Argued April 15 and 16, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. Mr. Timothy S. Hogan, Attorney General of Ohio, and Messrs. T. H. Hogsett, Charles C. Marshall, and Frank Davis, Jr., for appellant. Messrs. W. M. Duncan and William B. Sanders for appellee. Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court: 1 The case originated in a bill...

# 2
Hooker v. Knapp, Nos. 773 and 774 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 07, 1912

225 U.S. 302 (1912) HOOKER v. KNAPP ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. EAGLE WHITE LEAD COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. Nos. 773, 774. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 11, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. Mr. Francis B. James for appellants. Mr. P.J. Farrell for the Interstate Commerce Commission. Mr. R. Walton Moore for Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company. *305 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE...

# 3
Wheeler v. United States, Nos. 658, 659, 660, and 661 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 13, 1912

226 U.S. 478 33 S. Ct. 158 57 L. Ed. 309 WARREN B. WHEELER, Plff. in Err., v. UNITED STATES. NO 658. STILLMAN SHAW, Plff. in Err., v. UNITED STATES. NO 659. WARREN B. WHEELER, Appt., v. GUY MURCHIE, United States Marshal, NO 660. STILLMAN SHAW, Appt., v. GUY MURCHIE, UNITED STATES MARSHALL, ETC. NO 661. Nos. 658, 659, 660, and 661. Submitted December 4, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Messrs. Nathan Matthews, William G. Thompson, and Romney Spring for plaintiffs in error and appellants. [...

# 4
United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. of Chicago, Nos. 621 and 622 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 16, 1912

226 U.S. 286 (1912) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UPON THE APPLICATION OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, AT THE REQUEST OF THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, v. UNION STOCK YARD & TRANSIT COMPANY OF CHICAGO. CHICAGO JUNCTION RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 621, 622. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 24, 1912. Decided December 9, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. *287 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins and Mr. William E. Lamb, Special Assistant to the Attorney...

# 5
United States v. Miller, Nos. 607 and 608 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 26, 1912

223 U.S. 599 (1912) UNITED STATES v. MILLER. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 607, 608. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 9, 1912. Decided February 26, 1912. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. The Solicitor General for the United States. *601 Mr. Alexander A. Lawrence, with whom Mr. M. Hampton Todd and Mr. William W. Osborne were on the brief, for defendant in error. *602 MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the court. These were...

# 6
Ripley v. United States, Nos. 498 and 499 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 11, 1912

223 U.S. 695 (1912) RIPLEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. RIPLEY. Nos. 498, 499. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 22, 1911. Decided March 11, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *701 Mr. William H. Robeson, Mr. Benjamin Carter and Mr. F. Carter Pope for appellant. Mr. Assistant Attorney General John Q. Thompson and Mr. Philip M. Ashford for the United States. MR. JUSTICE LAMAR, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff sued...

# 7
Standard Oil Co. of Ind. v. Missouri, Nos. 47 and 48 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 01, 1912

224 U.S. 270 (1912) STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF INDIANA v. STATE OF MISSOURI ON THE INFORMATION OF HADLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCEEDED BY MAJOR. REPUBLIC OIL COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 47, 48. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 8, 9, 1911. Decided April 1, 1912. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. *275 Mr. Frank Hagerman, with whom Mr. Alfred D. Eddy and Mr. Robert W. Stewart were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Elliott W. Major, Attorney General of the State of...

# 8
Int. Com. Comm. v. Union Pacific RR, Nos. 451, 452, 453 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 15, 1912

222 U.S. 541 (1912) INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. SAME v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. SAME v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. Nos. 451, 452, 453. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 18, 19, 1911. Decided January 9, 1912. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. *546 Mr. Luther M. Walter and Mr. Jesse C. Adkins for appellant. Mr. Hale Holden, with whom Mr. Charles Donnelly and Mr. F.C. Dillard were on...

# 9
Converse v. Hamilton, Nos. 42 and 43 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 01, 1912

224 U.S. 243 (1912) CONVERSE, RECEIVER, v. HAMILTON. SAME v. McCAULEY. Nos. 42, 43. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 7, 1911. Decided April 1, 1912. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. *245 Mr. C.A. Severance, with whom Mr. Burr W. Jones, Mr. E.J.B. Schubring, Mr. Frank B. Kellogg and Mr. Robert E. Olds were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles E. Buell, with whom Mr. John B. Sanborn and Mr. Chauncey E. Blake were on the brief, for defendant in...

# 10
Smith v. Hitchcock, Nos. 31 and 32 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 18, 1912

226 U.S. 53 (1912) SMITH AND OTHERS, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF STREET & SMITH, APPELLANTS, v. HITCHCOCK, POSTMASTER-GENERAL. FRANK TOUSEY, PUBLISHER, A CORPORATION, v. SAME. Nos. 31, 32. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 5, 6, 1912. Decided November 18, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *54 Mr. J.J. Darlington and Mr. H.H. Glassie for appellants. *57 The Solicitor General for the appellee. The former Solicitor General, Mr. Frederick W....

# 11
United States v. Société Anonyme Des Anciens Establissements Cail, Nos. 209 and 210 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 08, 1912

224 U.S. 309 (1912) THE UNITED STATES v. SOCIETE ANONYME DES ANCIENS ETABLISSEMENTS CAIL. SOCIETE ANONYME DES ANCIENS ETABLISSEMENTS CAIL v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 209, 210. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 12, 13, 1912. Decided April 8, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *310 Mr. Assistant Attorney General John Q. Thompson and Mr. Malcolm A. Coles for the United States. Mr. Philip Mauro and Mr. T.D. Merwin, for appellee in No. 209 and appellant in No. 210. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA...

# 12
United States v. Reading Co., Nos. 198, 206, and 217 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 23, 1912

226 U.S. 324 (1912) UNITED STATES v. READING COMPANY. TEMPLE IRON COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. READING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 198, 206, 217. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 10, 11, 1911. Decided December 16, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. *326 Mr. J.C. McReynolds, with whom The Attorney General and Mr. G. Carroll Todd were on the brief, for the United States. Mr. John G. Johnson and Mr. Adelbert Moot, with...

# 13
Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co., Nos. 191 and 192 (1912)

225 U.S. 111 (1912) BIGELOW v. OLD DOMINION COPPER MINING AND SMELTING CO. Nos. 191, 192. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 5, 6, 1912. Decided May 27, 1912. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. *113 Mr. John C. Spooner, with whom Mr. George Rublee, Mr. Joseph P. Cotton, Jr., Mr. Charles H. Tyler, Mr. Owen D. Young, Mr. Burton E. Eames and Mr. William C. Rice were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Edward F. McClennen and Mr. Louis D. Brandeis...

# 14
Shulthis v. McDougal, Nos. 156, 157 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 07, 1912

225 U.S. 561 (1912) SHULTHIS v. McDOUGAL. BERRYHILL v. SHULTHIS. Nos. 156, 157. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 23, 24, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *562 Mr. C.L. Thomas, with whom Mr. Edgar A. de Meules was on the brief for appellant in No. 156, and appellee in No. 157. Mr. James P. Harrold for appellant in No. 157. Mr. Geo. S. Ramsay and Mr. Preston C. West for appellee in No. 156. *565 MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER...

# 15
Zeckendorf v. Steinfeld, Nos. 139 and 140 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 07, 1912

225 U.S. 445 (1912) ZECKENDORF v. STEINFELD. STEINFELD v. ZECKENDORF. Nos. 139, 140. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 15, 1912. Decided June 7, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. *446 Mr. Frank H. Hereford and Mr. Edwin A. Meserve for appellant in No. 139 and appellees in No. 140. Mr. Eugene S. Ives, with whom Mr. Francis J. Heney was on the brief, for appellees in No. 139 and appellants in No. 140. MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court....

# 16
United States v. Southern Pacific R. Co., Nos. 128 and 129 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 26, 1912

223 U.S. 565 (1912) UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 128, 129. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 26, 1912. Decided February 26, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *566 The Solicitor General for the United States. Mr. Maxwell Evarts for appellees in No. 128 and appellants in No. 129. *569 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. This is a bill brought by the...

# 17
Fairbanks v. United States, Nos. 112 and 113 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 19, 1912

223 U.S. 215 (1912) FAIRBANKS v. UNITED STATES. WARREN v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 112, 113. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 18, 19, 1912. Decided February 19, 1912. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *216 Mr. F.W. Houghton, with whom Mr. George B. Edgerton was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Knaebel, with whom Mr. S.W. Williams was on the brief, for the United States. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court....

# 18
Galveston, H. & SAR Co. v. Wallace, Nos. 108 and 109 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 19, 1912

223 U.S. 481 (1912) GALVESTON, HARRISBURG AND SAN ANTONIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. WALLACE. SAME v. CROW. Nos. 108, 109. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 15, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. *482 Mr. Maxwell Evarts and Mr. James L. Bishop for plaintiffs in error. *488 MR. JUSTICE LAMAR delivered the opinion of the court. In both these cases the plaintiff in error was held liable as "...

# 19
Reitler v. Harris, No 99 (1912)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 19, 1912

223 U.S. 437 (1912) REITLER v. HARRIS. No. 99. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 13, 1911. Decided February 19, 1912. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. *438 Mr. F. Dumont Smith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic deC. Faust, with whom Mr. A.C. Dyer and Mr. L.M. Day were on the brief, for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the court. This was an action in a District Court of the State of Kansas to recover the possession of a...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer