Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Arkadelphia Milling v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry., Nos. 92-95 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1919

249 U.S. 134 39 S. Ct. 237 63 L. Ed. 517 ARKADELPHIA MILLING CO. v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. et al. HASTY et al. v. SAME. ST. LOUIS, I. M. & S. RY. CO. et al. v. SOUTHERN COTTON OIL CO. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. et al. v. SAME. Nos. 92-95. Submitted Dec. 17, 1918. Decided March 3, 1919. [Syllabus from pages 134-136 intentionally omitted] Messrs. W. E. Hemingway, G. B. Rose, D. H. Cantrell, J. F. Loughborough, and V. M. Miles, all of Little Rock, Ark., for appellants in 92 and 93 and...

# 1
Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, Nos. 815 and 816 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1919

250 U.S. 360 (1919) COMMERCIAL CABLE COMPANY v. BURLESON ET AL. COMMERCIAL PACIFIC CABLE COMPANY v. BURLESON ET AL. Nos. 815, 816. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 7, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Mr. Charles E. Hughes, with whom Mr. William W. Cook was on the briefs, for appellants. The Solicitor General, with whom Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Todd was on the briefs, for appellees. *...

# 2
Blair v. United States, Nos. 763-768 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 02, 1919

250 U.S. 273 (1919) BLAIR v. UNITED STATES. TEMPLETON v. UNITED STATES. PHILLIPS v. UNITED STATES. BLAIR v. UNITED STATES ET AL. TEMPLETON v. UNITED STATES ET AL. PHILLIPS v. UNITED STATES ET AL. Nos. 763-768. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 28, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. *274 Mr. Martin W. Littleton,...

# 3
United States v. Babcock, Nos. 708, 915 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 02, 1919

250 U.S. 328 (1919) UNITED STATES v. BABCOCK. UNITED STATES v. HAYDEN. Nos. 708, 915. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 15, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *329 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson for the United States. Mr. George A. King, with whom Mr. William B. King and Mr. William E. Harvey were on the briefs, for appellees. MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the court. These cases, which were argued together, are appeals by the United...

# 4
F. Vitelli & Son v. United States, Nos. 67, 68 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1919

250 U.S. 355 39 S. Ct. 544 63 L. Ed. 1028 F. VITELLI & SON v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 67, 68. Argued April 24, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. Mr. Albert M. Yuzzolino, of New York City, for petitioners. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hanson, for the United States. Mr. Chief Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The petitioners, Vitelli & Son during the years 1905-1907, made entry at the port of New York of 19 different lots of dutiable merchandise, that is, chestnuts and garlic, and these...

# 5
GS Nicholas & Co. v. United States, Nos. 62, 63 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1919

249 U.S. 34 (1919) G.S. NICHOLAS & COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. ALEX D. SHAW & COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 62, 63. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 14, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS APPEALS. Mr. Albert H. Washburn for petitioners in No. 62. Mr. W.P. Preble for petitioners in No. 63. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hanson for the United States. *35 MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. Writs of...

# 6
Wagner v. City of Covington, Nos. 61, 62 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 08, 1919

251 U.S. 95 (1919) WAGNER ET AL., PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF W.T. WAGNER'S SONS, v. CITY OF COVINGTON. No. 61. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 10, 11, 1919. Decided December 8, 1919. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. Mr. Harry Brent Mackoy, with whom Mr. William H. Mackoy was on the briefs, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. E.A. Stricklett for defendant in error. *98 MR. JUSTICE PITNEY delivered the opinion of the court. This was an action...

# 7
Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co., Nos. 589, 602 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 15, 1919

251 U.S. 146 (1919) HAMILTON, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE COLLECTION DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, v. KENTUCKY DISTILLERIES & WAREHOUSE COMPANY. DRYFOOS ET AL. v. EDWARDS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND COLLECTION DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 589, 602. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 20, 1919. Decided December 15, 1919. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR...

# 8
Allanwilde Transport Corp. v. Vacuum Oil Co., Nos. 449, 450 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 13, 1919

248 U.S. 377 (1919) ALLANWILDE TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. VACUUM OIL COMPANY. SAME v. PIDWELL. Nos. 449, 450. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 12, 1918. Decided January 13, 1919. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. *378 Mr. Oscar D. Duncan, with whom Mr. Russell T. Mount and Mr. Courtland Palmer were on the brief, for Allanwilde Transport Corporation. Mr. John C. Prizer for Vacuum Oil Co. and Pidwell. *381 MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion...

# 9
Schenck v. United States, Nos. 437, 438 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1919

249 U.S. 47 (1919) SCHENCK v. UNITED STATES. BAER v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 437, 438. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 9, 10, 1919. Decided March 3, 1919. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. *48 Mr. Henry John Nelson and Mr. Henry J. Gibbons for plaintiffs in error. Mr. John Lord O'Brian, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Alfred Bettman, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, was on the brief, for the...

# 10
Maxwell v. Bugbee, Nos. 43, 238 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 10, 1919

250 U.S. 525 (1919) MAXWELL ET AL., EXECUTORS OF McDONALD, v. BUGBEE, COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL. HILL, ADMINISTRATOR OF HILL, v. BUGBEE, COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL. Nos. 43, 238. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 18, 19, 1919. Decided October 27, 1919. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. *527 Mr. Lawrence Maxwell and Mr. E.C. Lindley, with whom Mr. William A. Smith was on the brief,...

# 11
Neilson v. Rhine Shipping Co., Nos. 393 and 394 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 07, 1919

248 U.S. 205 (1918) NEILSON ET AL. v. RHINE SHIPPING COMPANY, CLAIMANT OF THE SAILING SHIP "RHINE." HARDY ET AL. v. SHEPARD & MORSE LUMBER COMPANY, CLAIMANT OF THE BARKENTINE "WINDRUSH." Nos. 393, 394. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 5, 1918. Decided December 23, 1918. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *206 Mr. Silas B. Axtell, with whom Mr. Vernon S. Jones was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Roscoe H. Hupper for respondents. Mr. Assistant...

# 12
New York Cent. R. Co. v. Bianc. American Knife Co. v. Sweeting. Clark Knitting Co., Inc. v. Vaughn, Nos. 374, 375 and 376.—October Term, 1919 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 10, 1919

250 U.S. 596 40 S. Ct. 44 63 L. Ed. 1161 NEW YORK CENT. R. CO. v. BIANC. AMERICAN KNIFE CO. et al. v. SWEETING. CLARK KNITTING CO., Inc., et al. v. VAUGHN. Nos. 374, 375 and 376.—October Term, 1919. Argued Oct. 22 and 23, 1919. Decided Nov. 10, 1919. In No. 374: Mr. Robert E. Whalen, of Albany, N. Y., for plaintiff in error. [Argument of Counsel from pages 596-599 intentionally omitted] In Nos. 375, 376: Mr. William H. Foster, of Syracuse, N. Y., for plaintiffs in error. Mr. E. C. Aiken, of...

# 13
Denver & Rio Grande R. Co. v. City and County of Denver, Nos. 322, 323 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 02, 1919

250 U.S. 241 (1919) DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL. DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER ET AL. Nos. 322, 323. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted April 23, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO. Mr. E.N. Clark for plaintiff in error. Mr. J.G. McMurry was on the briefs. *242 Mr. James A. Marsh and...

# 14
Parker v. Richard, Nos. 313 and 563 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 02, 1919

250 U.S. 235 (1919) PARKER, PARKER, AS SUPERINTENDENT FOR THE FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES, ET AL. v. RICHARD ET AL., CO-ADMINISTRATORS OF RICHARD. Nos. 313, 563. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 24, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Kearful for appellants. Mr. Britton H. Tabor and Mr. James B. Lucas for appellees. *236 MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the court. This is a suit to...

# 15
Pell v. McCabe, Nos. 311 and 335 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 10, 1919

250 U.S. 573 (1919) PELL ET AL. v. McCABE ET AL. Nos. 311, 335. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 16, 1919. Decided November 10, 1919. APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *574 Mr. Lindley M. Garrison, with whom Mr. Emanuel J. Myers and Mr. Gordon S.P. Kleeberg were on the briefs, for appellants and petitioners. Mr. William St. John Tozer and Mr. Henry Buist, with whom Mr. George L. Buist was on the briefs, for appellees and respondents....

# 16
TH Symington Co. v. National Malleable Casting Co., Nos. 31, 24 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1919

250 U.S. 383 (1919) T.H. SYMINGTON COMPANY v. NATIONAL MALLEABLE CASTINGS COMPANY ET AL. MINER v. T.H. SYMINGTON COMPANY. Nos. 31, 24. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 19, 22, 1918. Decided June 9, 1919. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. *384 Mr. George I. Haight for petitioner in No. 24. Mr. Melville Church and Mr. Gilbert P. Ritter, with whom Mr. W.S. Symington, Jr., and Mr. Ernest...

# 17
Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Minds, Nos. 293 and 294 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1919

250 U.S. 368 (1919) PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MINDS, SURVIVING AND LIQUIDATING PARTNER OF MINDS ET AL., LATELY TRADING AS BULAH COAL COMPANY. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MINDS ET AL., TRADING AS BULAH COAL COMPANY. Nos. 293, 294. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 23, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. *369 Mr. Francis I. Gowen and Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, with whom Mr. Henry Wolf Bikle was on the brief, for plaintiff...

# 18
Public Util. Comm'n of Kan. v. Landon, Nos. 277, 329, 330, 353 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 17, 1919

249 U.S. 236 (1919) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR THE STATE OF KANSAS ET AL. v. LANDON, RECEIVER OF THE KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, ET AL. KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, ET AL. v. LANDON, RECEIVER OF THE KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, ET AL. KANSAS CITY GAS COMPANY ET AL. v. KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY ET AL. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION FOR THE STATE OF KANSAS ET AL. v. LANDON, RECEIVER OF THE KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY, ET AL. Nos. 277, 329, 330, 353. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 6,...

# 19
Stilson v. United States, Nos. 264 and 265 (1919)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 10, 1919

250 U.S. 583 (1919) STILSON v. UNITED STATES. SUKYS v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 264, 265. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 20, 21, 1919. Decided November 10, 1919. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. *584 Mr. Henry John Nelson for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Stewart, with whom Mr. W.C. Herron was on the brief, for the United States. MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiffs in error...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer