Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Carley & Hamilton, Inc. v. Snook, Nos. 86, 267 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1930

281 U.S. 66 (1930) CARLEY & HAMILTON, INC., ET AL. v. SNOOK, CHIEF OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COTTINGHAM ET AL. v. SAME. Nos. 86 and 267. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 9, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. *67 Messrs. W.R. Crawford and Edwin C. Ewing, with whom Mr. J.F. Vizzard was on the brief, submitted for Carley & Hamilton, Inc., et al., appellants....

# 1
Wisconsin v. Illinois, Nos. 7, 11, 12, Original (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 14, 1930

281 U.S. 179 (1930) WISCONSIN ET AL. v. ILLINOIS ET AL. MICHIGAN v. ILLINOIS ET AL. NEW YORK v. ILLINOIS ET AL. Nos. 7, 11, and 12, Original. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 12, 13, 1930. Decided April 14, 1930. *181 Messrs. Raymond T. Jackson, Special Assistant Attorney General of Wisconsin; Gilbert Bettman, Attorney General of Ohio; Wilbur M. Brucker, Attorney General of Michigan; and Newton D. Baker, Special Assistant Attorney General of Ohio; with whom Messrs. John W. Reynolds,...

# 2
United Rs. & Elec. Co. of Baltimore v. West, Nos. 55 and 64 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 06, 1930

280 U.S. 234 (1930) UNITED RAILWAYS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE v. WEST, CHAIRMAN, ET AL. WEST, CHAIRMAN, ET AL. v. UNITED RAILWAYS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE. Nos. 55 and 64. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 29, 1929. Decided January 6, 1930. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. *236 Messrs. Charles McHenry Howard and Charles Markell, with whom Mr. Henry H. Waters was on the brief, for The United Railways & Electric Company of Baltimore. Messrs. Raymond S....

# 3
Richbourg Motor Co. v. United States, Nos. 452, 569 (1930)

281 U.S. 528 (1930) RICHBOURG MOTOR COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. DAVIES MOTORS, INCORPORATED, v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 452 and 569. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 25, 1930. Decided May 19, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH AND NINTH CIRCUITS RESPECTIVELY. *529 Mr. Joseph G. Myerson, with whom Messrs. Phillip W. Haberman, Charles G. Lee, Jr., and R.R. Williams were on the brief, for Richbourg Motor Company. Mr. Duane R. Dills, with whom Messrs. William K....

# 4
Campbell v. WH Long & Co., Nos. 445, 510, 511 (1930)

281 U.S. 610 (1930) CAMPBELL, FEDERAL PROHIBITION ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL. v. W.H. LONG & COMPANY, INCORPORATED. WYNNE, FEDERAL PROHIBITION ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL. v. SWANSON CHEMICAL CORPORATION. DORAN, PROHIBITION COMMISSIONER, v. CASPER. Nos. 445, 510 and 511. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 25, 1930. Decided May 26, 1930. CERTIORARI TO AND CERTIFICATES FROM THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD CIRCUITS, RESPECTIVELY. *611 Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, with...

# 5
Campbell Fed. Prohibition Administrator v. Galeno Chemical Co., Nos. 443 and 444 (1930)

281 U.S. 599 (1930) CAMPBELL, FEDERAL PROHIBITION ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL. v. GALENO CHEMICAL COMPANY ET. AL. SAME v. D.P. PAUL & COMPANY, INCORPORATED. Nos. 443 and 444. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 25, 1930. Decided May 26, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *600 Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, with whom Attorney General Mitchell, Messrs. Mahlon D. Kiefer and John H. McEvers were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. John Fletcher Caskey...

# 6
Beaumont, Sl & W. Ry. v. United States, Nos. 44, 45 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 24, 1930

282 U.S. 74 (1930) BEAUMONT, SOUR LAKE & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. UNITED STATES ET AL. v. BEAUMONT, SOUR LAKE & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET. AL. Nos. 44 and 45. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 20, 1930. Decided November 24, 1930. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. *76 Messrs. F.H. Moore and Samuel W. Moore, with whom Messrs. W.E. Davis, E.T. Miller, M.G. Roberts, J.R. *77 Bell, G.H. Muckley, H.H....

# 7
Tyler v. United States, Nos. 428, 546, 547 (1930)

281 U.S. 497 (1930) TYLER ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS, v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. PROVIDENT TRUST COMPANY ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS. LUCAS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. GIRARD TRUST COMPANY ET AL., EXECUTORS. Nos. 428, 546 and 547. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 24, 1930. Decided May 19, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH AND THIRD CIRCUITS. *498 Mr. Frank S. Bright, with whom Mr. H. Stanley Hinrichs was on the brief, for Tyler et al. Mr. John...

# 8
City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. Reakirt, Nos. 372-374 (1930)

281 U.S. 439 50 S. Ct. 360 74 L. Ed. 950 CITY OF CINCINNATI v. VESTER. SAME v. RICHARDS et al. SAME v. REAKIRT. Nos. 372-374. Argued April 17-21, 1930. Decided May 19, 1930. Messrs. John D. Ellis and Ed. F. Alexander, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Mr. John Weld Peck, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondents. Mr. Chief Justice HUGHES delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 These three cases were heard together. The suits were brought by owners of land in the city of Cincinnati to restrain...

# 9
Wabash R. Co. v. Barclay, Nos. 37 and 38 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 06, 1930

280 U.S. 197 (1930) WABASH RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. BARCLAY ET AL. AUSTIN v. SAME. Nos. 37 and 38. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 2, 1929. Decided January 6, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *198 ERRATUM, 280 U.S. p. 198. Amend the second paragraph so as to read: Mr. Charles E. Hughes, with whom Messrs. Winslow S. Pierce, F.C. Nicodemus, jr., Winthrop Taylor, and Arnold L. Davis were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Joseph S. Clark,...

# 10
Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co., Nos. 323, 324 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 14, 1930

281 U.S. 264 (1930) LUCAS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. KANSAS CITY STRUCTURAL STEEL COMPANY. Nos. 323 and 324. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 13, 14, 1930. Decided April 14, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *265 Solicitor General Hughes, with whom Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Messrs. Sewall Key and Randolph C. Shaw, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, Clarence M. Charest, General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue,...

# 11
Powers-Kennedy Co. v. Concrete Co., Nos. 3, 4 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 15, 1930

282 U.S. 175 (1930) POWERS-KENNEDY CONTRACTING CORPORATION ET AL. v. CONCRETE MIXING AND CONVEYING COMPANY. CONCRETE MIXING AND CONVEYING COMPANY v. R.C. STORRIE & COMPANY. Nos. 3 and 4. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 17, 1929. Reargued October 24, 1930. Decided December 15, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND AND NINTH CIRCUITS. *176 Messrs. John D. Morgan and Alan M. Johnson for the Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corporation et al. Messrs. Stephen J....

# 12
United States v. Adams, Nos. 281, 282 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 14, 1930

281 U.S. 202 (1930) UNITED STATES v. ADAMS. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 281 and 282. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 6, 1930. Decided April 14, 1930. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. *203 Assistant Attorney General Sisson, with whom Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Messrs. George C. Butte and Harry S. Ridgely were on the briefs, for the United States. Mr. T.H. Caraway for Adams. MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the...

# 13
Ohio Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park Dist., Nos. 237, 238 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 12, 1930

281 U.S. 74 (1930) OHIO EX REL. BRYANT v. AKRON METROPOLITAN PARK DISTRICT ET AL. OHIO EX REL. WADSWORTH v. ZANGERLE ET AL. Nos. 237 and 238. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 27, 28, 1930. Decided March 12, 1930. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. *76 Messrs. Frederick A. Henry and Luther Day, with whom Mr. George D. Hile was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Chester L. Dinsmore, Frederick W. Green, Joseph A.H. Myers and William A. Spencer were on the brief for the Akron...

# 14
Lektophone Corp. v. Rola Co., Nos. 19, 68 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 08, 1930

282 U.S. 168 (1930) LEKTOPHONE CORPORATION v. THE ROLA COMPANY. MILLER BROTHERS COMPANY v. LEKTOPHONE CORPORATION. Nos. 19 and 68. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 26, 1930. Decided December 8, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH AND THIRD CIRCUITS. Mr. William H. Davis for the Lektophone Corporation. Mr. Thomas G. Haight, with whom Messrs. Charles E. Townsend, William A. Loftus, and Theodore S. Kenyon were on the brief, for the Rola Company. Messrs....

# 15
United States v. American Can Co. Same v. Missouri Can Co. Same v. Detroit Can Co, Nos. 128-130 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1930

280 U.S. 412 50 S. Ct. 177 74 L. Ed. 518 UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN CAN CO. SAME v. MISSOURI CAN CO. SAME v. DETROIT CAN CO. Nos. 128-130. Argued Jan. 21, 1930. Decided Feb. 24, 1930. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles E. Hughes, Jr., Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., for the United States. [Argument of Counsel from page 413 intentionally omitted] Mr. Graham Sumner, of New York City, for respondent. [Argument of Counsel from page 414 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice McREYNOLDS delivered the...

# 16
Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other Cases, Nos. 127, 275, 350-352 (1930)

281 U.S. 580 50 S. Ct. 422 74 L. Ed. 1051 UNIVERSAL BATTERY CO. v. UNITED STATES and four other cases. Nos. 127, 275, 350-352. Argued Jan. 21, 1930. Decided May 26, 1930. Mr. George Maurice Morris, of Washington, D. C., for petitioners in cases Nos. 127 and 275. Mr. George M. Wilmeth, of Washington, D. C., for petitioners in cases Nos. 350, 351, and 352. The Attorney General and Mr. Claude R. Branch, of Providence, R. I., for the United States. Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of...

# 17
Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United States, Nos. 118 and 414 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1930

280 U.S. 453 (1930) FLORSHEIM BROTHERS DRYGOODS COMPANY, LTD., v. UNITED STATES. WHITE, COLLECTOR, v. HOOD RUBBER CO. Nos. 118 and 414. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 13, 14, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH AND FIRST CIRCUITS RESPECTIVELY. *454 Mr. James Craig Peacock, with whom Messrs. Allen Rendall, A.B. Freyer and E.H. Randolph were on the brief, for Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Company, Ltd. Mr. Harold C....

# 18
Lucas v. Earl, 99 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 17, 1930

281 U.S. 111 (1930) LUCAS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. EARL. No. 99. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 3, 1930. Decided March 17, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Solicitor General Hughes, with whom Assistant Attorney General Youngquist and Messrs. Millar E. McGilchrist, Claude R. Branch, Sewall Key and J. Louis Monarch, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Warren Olney, Jr., with whom...

# 19
District of Columbia v. Colts, 96 (1930)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 24, 1930

282 U.S. 63 (1930) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. COLTS. No. 96. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 23, 1930. Decided November 24, 1930. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *64 Mr. Robert E. Lynch, with whom Messrs. Wm. W. Bride and Robert P. Reeder were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. William B. O'Connell, with whom Messrs. Harry T. Whelan and Louis L. Whitestone were on the brief, for respondent. *70 MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court....

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer