Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Taylor v. Mississippi, Nos. 826, 827, 828 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 14, 1943

319 U.S. 583 (1943) TAYLOR v. MISSISSIPPI. [*] No. 826. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 15, 16, 1943. Decided June 14, 1943. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Mr. Hayden C. Covington for appellants. Mr. Geo. H. Ethridge, Assistant Attorney General of Mississippi, with whom Mr. Greek L. Rice, Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Charles C. Evans filed a brief on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. MR. JUSTICE...

# 1
United States v. Wayne Pump Co., Nos. 81 and 82 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 04, 1943

317 U.S. 200 (1942) UNITED STATES v. WAYNE PUMP CO. ET AL. Nos. 81 and 82. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 16, 1942. Decided December 7, 1942. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *201 Assistant Attorney General Arnold, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Archibald Cox were on the brief, for the United States. Mr. Edward R. Johnston for the Wayne Pump Co. et al.; Mr. James H. Winston for the Gilbert & Barker Mfg. Co. et...

# 2
Matton SS Co. v. Murphy, Nos. 783, 813 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 01, 1943

319 U.S. 412 (1943) MATTON STEAMBOAT CO., INC. ET AL. v. MURPHY, ACTING INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONER, ET AL. [*] No. 783. Supreme Court of United States. Argued May 5, 1943. Decided June 1, 1943. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT. Mr. Frank C. Mason, with whom Messrs. H. Maurice Fridlund and Edward L.P. O'Connor were on the brief, for appellants in No. 783. Mr. Francis S. Bensel, with *413 whom Messrs. Hersey Egginton and Nicholas Kelley were on the...

# 3
Standard Dredging Corp. v. Murphy, Nos. 722 and 723 (1943)

319 U.S. 306 (1943) STANDARD DREDGING CORPORATION v. MURPHY, ACTING INDUSTRIAL COMMISSIONER, ET AL. [*] No. 722. Supreme Court of United States. Argued May 5, 1943. Decided May 24, 1943. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT. Mr. Cletus Keating, with whom Messrs. H. Maurice Fridlund and Charles S. Cunningham were on the brief, for appellant in No. 722; and Mr. Robert B. Lisle, with whom Messrs. Arthur E. Goddard and Jules Haberman were on the brief, for...

# 4
Ecker v. Western Pacific R. Corp., Nos. 7, 8, 20, 33 and 61 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 19, 1943

318 U.S. 448 (1943) ECKER ET AL., CONSTITUTING INSTITUTIONAL BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE, v. WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CORP. ET AL. [*] No. 7. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 13, 14, 1942. Decided March 15, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *451 Mr. Robert T. Swaine, with whom Messrs. Herbert W. Clark and Benjamin R. Shute were on the briefs, for the Institutional Bondholders Committee, petitioner in No. 7 and respondent in Nos. 8, 20, 33, and 61....

# 5
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United States (Three Cases), Nos. 623—625 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 14, 1943

319 U.S. 598 63 S. Ct. 1284 87 L. Ed. 1612 OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION v. UNITED STATES (three cases). Nos. 623—625. Argued April 9, 1943. Decided June 14, 1943. Messrs. Clifford W. King and A. L. Herr, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for petitioner respondent. Mr. Warner W. Gardner, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mr. Justice BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 The United States brought these three actions to recover inheritance taxes imposed by the State of Oklahoma upon the transfer of...

# 6
Buchalter v. New York, Nos. 606, 610, 619 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 01, 1943

319 U.S. 427 (1943) BUCHALTER v. NEW YORK. [*] No. 606. Supreme Court of United States. Argued May 7, 10, 1943. Decided June 1, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE COUNTY COURT OF KINGS COUNTY, NEW YORK. Messrs. Arthur Garfield Hays, Sydney Rosenthal, I. Maurice Wormser, John Schulman, and J. Bertram Wegman, with whom Messrs. Gerald Weatherly and Benj. J. Jacobson were on the brief, for petitioners. *428 Mr. Solomon A. Klein, with whom Messrs. Thomas Cradock Hughes, Henry J. Walsh, and Edward H. Levine...

# 7
Southland Gasoline Co. v. Bayley, Nos. 581, 725 (1943)

319 U.S. 44 (1943) SOUTHLAND GASOLINE CO. v. BAYLEY ET AL. [*] No. 581. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted April 5, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Mr. Claude H. Rosenstein submitted for petitioner in No. 581. Mr. George A. Mahone for petitioner in No. 725. Mr. C.D. Atkinson submitted for respondents in No. 581. Messrs. O. Bowie Duckett, Jr., and Charles T. LeViness, with whom Mr. Edward E. Hargest, Jr., was on the brief, for...

# 8
Tot v. United States, Nos. 569, 636 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 07, 1943

319 U.S. 463 (1943) TOT v. UNITED STATES. [*] No. 569. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 5, 1943. Decided June 7, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Mr. George R. Sommer, with whom Mr. Frederic M.P. Pearse was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 569. Messrs. Jack N. Tucker and Morton A. Eden for respondent in No. 636. *464 Assistant Attorney General Berge, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Irwin L. Langbein and Valentine Brookes were on...

# 9
Nat. Broadcasting Co. v. United States, Nos. 554, 555 (1943)

319 U.S. 190 (1943) NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. [*] No. 554. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 10, 11, 1943. Decided May 10, 1943. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. *192 Mr. John T. Cahill, with whom Messrs. A.L. Ashby, Harold S. Glendening, and John W. Nields were on the brief, for the National Broadcasting Co.; and Mr. E. Willoughby Middleton, with whom Mr. Thomas H. Middleton was on the...

# 10
Robinette v. Helvering, Nos. 499 and 500 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 15, 1943

318 U.S. 184 (1943) ROBINETTE v. HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. [*] No. 499. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 14, 1943. Decided February 15, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. *185 Mr. Henry A. Mulcahy, with whom Mr. Guilford S. Jameson was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Arnold Raum, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, and L.W. Post were on the brief,...

# 11
Burford v. Sun Oil Co., Nos. 495, 496 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 21, 1943

319 U.S. 315 (1943) BURFORD ET AL. v. SUN OIL CO. ET AL. [*] No. 495. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 8, 9, 1943. Reargued April 14, 15, 1943. Decided May 24, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *316 Messrs. James P. Hart and Ed Roy Simmons, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, with whom Mr. Gerald C. Mann, Attorney General, was on the brief, for petitioners in No. 495 and respondents in No. 496. Mr. J.A. Rauhut argued the cause on the...

# 12
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, Nos. 480—487 (1943)

319 U.S. 105 (1943) MURDOCK v. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE). [*] No. 480. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 10, 11, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. *106 Mr. Hayden C. Covington for petitioners. Mr. Fred B. Trescher for respondent. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court. The City of Jeannette, Pennsylvania, has an ordinance, some forty years old, which provides in part: "That all persons canvassing for or soliciting...

# 13
Labor Board v. Southern Bell Co., Nos. 460, 461 (1943)

319 U.S. 50 (1943) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. [*] No. 460. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 5, 8, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *51 Mr. Robert B. Watts, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Robert L. Stern and Ernest A. Gross and Miss Ruth Weyand were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Marion Smith, with whom Mr. John A. Boykin, Jr. was on the brief, for respondent in...

# 14
Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJ, Nos. 454, 582 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 19, 1943

318 U.S. 724 (1943) AGUILAR v. STANDARD OIL CO. OF NEW JERSEY. [*] No. 454. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 2, 3, 1943. Decided April 19, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. George J. Engelman for petitioner in No. 454; and Mr. Joseph W. Henderson, with whom Mr. George M. Brodhead, Jr. was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 582. Mr. Walter X. Connor, with whom Mr. Vernon S. Jones was on the brief, for respondent in No. 454; and Mr. Abraham...

# 15
Douglas v. City of Jeannette, Nos. 450, 480—487, 238 (1943)

319 U.S. 157 (1943) DOUGLAS ET AL. v. CITY OF JEANNETTE ET AL. No. 450. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 10, 11, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. *159 Mr. Hayden C. Covington for petitioners. Mr. Fred B. Trescher for respondents. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court. Petitioners brought this suit in the United States District Court for Western Pennsylvania to restrain threatened criminal prosecution of...

# 16
United States v. Johnson. United States v. Sommers, Nos. 4 and 5 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 11, 1943

319 U.S. 503 63 S. Ct. 1233 87 L. Ed. 1546 UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON. UNITED STATES v. SOMMERS et al. Nos. 4 and 5. Reargued and Submitted Oct. 12, 1942. Decided June 7, 1943. Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1943. See 320 U.S. —-, 64 S. Ct. 25 , 88 L.Ed. —-. [Syllabus from pages 503-505 intentionally omitted] Mr. Arnold Raum, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Messrs. Floyd E. Thompson, of Chicago, Ill., and William J. Dempsey, of Washington, D.C., for respondent Johnson. Messrs. Harold R. Schradzke...

# 17
Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Bankers Trust Co., Nos. 387, 388 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 08, 1943

318 U.S. 163 (1943) RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION v. BANKERS TRUST CO., TRUSTEE. Nos. 387-388. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 8, 1943. Decided February 8, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *164 Mr. Paul A. Freund, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, and Mr. James L. Homire and Mrs. Florence de Haas Dembitz were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Joseph M. Hartfield, with whom Messrs. Jesse E. Waid and Fitzhugh McGrew were on the brief,...

# 18
Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. Of America v. United States. United States v. Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. Of America, Nos. 369, 373 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 11, 1943

320 U.S. 1 63 S. Ct. 1393 87 L. Ed. 1731 MARCONI WIRELESS TELEGRAPH CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. MARCONI WIRELESS TELEGRAPH CO. OF AMERICA. Nos. 369, 373. Argued April 9—12, 1943. Decided June 21, 1943. Rehearing Denied Oct. 11, 1943. See 320 U.S. —-, 64 S. Ct. 25 , 88 L.Ed. —-. [Syllabus from pages 1-3 intentionally omitted] Mr. Stephen H. Philbin, of New York City, for Marconi Wireless telegraph co. Mr. Francis M. Shea, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States. Mr. Chief...

# 19
Cafeteria Employees v. Angelos, Nos. 36, 37 (1943)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 22, 1943

320 U.S. 293 (1943) CAFETERIA EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 302, ET AL. v. ANGELOS ET AL. No. 36. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 8, 1943. Decided November 22, 1943. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. [*] *294 Mr. Louis B. Boudin for petitioners. Mr. Abraham Michael Katz submitted for respondents. MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER delivered the opinion of the Court. We brought these two cases here to determine whether injunctions sanctioned by the New York Court of Appeals exceeded...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer