Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
The Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company v. Charles Sawyer. Charles Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, Nos. 744, 745 (1952)

343 U.S. 937 72 S. Ct. 775 96 L. Ed. 1344 The YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE COMPANY et al., petitioners, v. Charles SAWYER. Charles SAWYER, Secretary of Commerce, petitioner, v. YOUNGSTOWN SHEET AND TUBE COMPANY et al. Nos. 744, 745. Supreme Court of the United States May 3, 1952 Messrs. John C. Gall and John J. Wilson, for Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. et al. Messrs. Luther Day, Edmund L. Jones, Howard Boyd, John C. Gall and T. F. Patton, for Republic Steel Corp. Messrs. Charles H. Tuttle and Joseph...

# 1
Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Group of Institutional Investors, Nos. 524 to 528. October Term, 1951 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1952

343 U.S. 982 72 S. Ct. 1018 96 L. Ed. 1372 CHEMICAL BANK & TRUST CO., Trustee, v. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS. ALLEGHANY CORPORATION v. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 5 1/4% SECURED SERIAL BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE v. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS. FARWELL et al. v. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v. GROUP OF INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS. Nos. 524 to 528. October Term, 1951. Decided June 9, 1952. Memorandum of Mr. Justice...

# 2
United States v. Halseth, 91 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 14, 1952

342 U.S. 277 (1952) UNITED STATES v. HALSETH. No. 91. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 28, 1951. Decided January 7, 1952. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. John R. Benney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General McInerney, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop. Horace J. Donnelly, Jr. argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief was Bruno V....

# 3
Doremus v. Board of Ed. of Hawthorne, 9 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 31, 1952

342 U.S. 429 (1952) DOREMUS ET AL. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BOROUGH OF HAWTHORNE ET AL. No. 9. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 31, 1952. Decided March 3, 1952. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY. Heyman Zimel argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General, and Henry F. Schenk, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellees and filed a brief for the State of New Jersey. Mr. Schenk also filed a brief for the Board of...

# 4
Hughes v. United States, 86 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 04, 1952

342 U.S. 353 (1952) HUGHES v. UNITED STATES. No. 86. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 7, 1952. Decided February 4, 1952. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. T. A. Slack argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Leonard P. Moore, John H. Dorsey and Francis J. O'Hara, Jr. were of counsel. *354 Philip Marcus argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General...

# 5
Perkins v. Benguet Consol. Mining Co., 85 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1952

342 U.S. 437 (1952) PERKINS v. BENGUET CONSOLIDATED MINING CO. ET AL. No. 85. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 27-28, 1951. Decided March 3, 1952. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. *438 Robert N. Gorman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Stanley A. Silversteen. Lucien H. Mercier argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Charles G. White. MR. JUSTICE BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court. This case calls for an answer to the...

# 6
Grady Ivey v. State of Texas, 84 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 13, 1952

344 U.S. 801 73 S. Ct. 16 97 L. Ed. 625 Grady IVEY, appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS. No. 84. Supreme Court of the United States October 13, 1952 Mr. L. N. D. Wells, Jr., for appellant. Messrs. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, and Willis E. Gresham and Calvin B. Garwood, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.

# 7
Rochin v. California, 83 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 02, 1952

342 U.S. 165 (1952) ROCHIN v. CALIFORNIA. No. 83. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 16, 1951. Decided January 2, 1952. CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Dolly Lee Butler and A. L. Wirin argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Howard S. Goldin, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney...

# 8
Brown v. Board of Education, 8 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 08, 1952

344 U.S. 1 (1952) BROWN ET AL. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA ET AL. No. 8. Supreme Court of United States. October 8, 1952. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. [*] *2 Robert L. Carter, Thurgood Marshall, Spottswood W. Robinson, III, George E. C. Hayes, George M. Johnson, William R. Ming, Jr., James M. Nabrit, Jr. and Frank D. Reeves for appellants. Oliver W. Hill was also with them on the brief in No. 191. T. C. Callison, Attorney General of South Carolina,...

# 9
Brown v. Board of Education, 8 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 24, 1952

344 U.S. 141 (1952) BROWN ET AL. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA ET AL. No. 8. Supreme Court of United States. November 24, 1952. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. Robert L. Carter, Thurgood Marshall, Spottswood W. Robinson, III, George E. C. Hayes, George M. Johnson, William R. Ming, Jr., James M. Nabrit, Jr. and Frank D. Reeves for appellants. PER CURIAM. This action was instituted by the appellants attacking a Kansas statute which authorized segregation...

# 10
Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New York, 8 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1952

342 U.S. 485 (1952) ADLER ET AL. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. No. 8. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 3, 1952. Decided March 3, 1952. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. *486 Osmond K. Fraenkel argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Arthur Garfield Hays. Michael A. Castaldi argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Denis M. Hurley, Seymour B. Quel, Daniel T. Scannell and Bernard Friedlander. By special leave of Court,...

# 11
Dixon v. Duffy, 79 (1952)

343 U.S. 393 (1952) DIXON v. DUFFY, WARDEN. No. 79. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 16, 1951. Continued November 5, 1951. Further continued May 12, 1952. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. PER CURIAM. On November 5, 1951, we ordered this cause "continued for such period as will enable counsel for petitioner to secure a determination from the Supreme Court of California as to whether the judgment herein was intended to rest on an adequate independent state ground or...

# 12
Alison v. United States, 79 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 08, 1952

344 U.S. 167 (1952) ALISON v. UNITED STATES. No. 79. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 12, 1952. Decided December 8, 1952. CERTIFICATE FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. [*] Karl E. Weise argued the cause for Alison in No. 79. With him on the brief was Paul Kern Hirsch. *168 Hilbert P. Zarky argued the cause for the United States in Nos. 79 and 80. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Lyon, Ellis N. Slack...

# 13
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 744 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 02, 1952

343 U.S. 579 (1952) YOUNGSTOWN SHEET & TUBE CO. ET AL. v. SAWYER. No. 744. Supreme Court of United States. Argued May 12-13, 1952. Decided June 2, 1952. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. [*] *581 John W. Davis argued the cause for petitioners in No. 744 and respondents in No. 745. On the brief were Mr. Davis, Nathan L. Miller, John Lord O'Brian, Roger M. Blough, Theodore Kiendl, Porter R. Chandler and Howard C. Westwood for the United States...

# 14
Ex Parte Cogdell., 71M (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 02, 1952

342 U.S. 163 (1951) EX PARTE COGDELL ET AL. No. 71, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Continued December 11, 1951. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. George E. C. Hayes, James M. Nabrit, Jr. and George M. Johnson for petitioners. Vernon E. West, Chester H. Gray and Milton D. Korman for McGuire et al., respondents. PER CURIAM. Petitioners brought suit in the District Court for the District of Columbia to restrain on constitutional grounds the enforcement of certain legislation passed by Congress...

# 15
W. L. Gelling v. State of Texas, 707 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 02, 1952

343 U.S. 960 72 S. Ct. 1002 96 L. Ed. 1359 W. L. GELLING, Appellant, v. STATE OF TEXAS. No. 707. Supreme Court of the United States June 2, 1952 Concurring Opinion of Justice Jackson June 9, 1952. Messrs. Robert H. Park, Herbert Wechsler, Philip J. O'Brien, Jr. and Sidney Schreiber, for appellant. Messrs. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, and E. Jacobson, Assistant Attorney General, for appelee. PER CURIAM. 1 The judgment is reversed. See Burstyn v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 , 72 S. Ct. 777 ;...

# 16
Ray v. Blair, 649 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 15, 1952

343 U.S. 154 72 S. Ct. 598 96 L. Ed. 852 RAY v. BLAIR. No. 649. Argued March 31, 1952. Decided April 3, 1952. Subsequent Opinion April 15, 1952. See 343 U.S. 214 , 72 S. Ct. 654 . Messrs. Marx Leva, Washington, D.C., Harold M. Cook, Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner. Mr. Horace C. Wilkinson, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent. PER CURIAM. 1 In this proceeding, an Alabama circuit court entered an order directing petitioner to certify to the Secretary of State of Alabama the name of respondent as a...

# 17
Ray v. Blair, 649 (1952)

343 U.S. 214 (1952) RAY, CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF ALABAMA, v. BLAIR. No. 649. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 31, 1952. Decided April 3, 1952. Opinions filed April 15, 1952. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA. *215 Marx Leva and Harold M. Cook argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were James J. Mayfield, George A. LeMaistre and Louis F. Oberdorfer. Horace C. Wilkinson argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. MR....

# 18
Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 62 (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 14, 1952

342 U.S. 282 (1952) HALCYON LINES ET AL. v. HAENN SHIP CEILING & REFITTING CORP. No. 62. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 27, 1951. Decided January 14, 1952. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. [*] Joseph W. Henderson argued the cause for the Halcyon Lines et al. With him on the briefs were Thomas F. Mount and George M. Brodhead. Thomas E. Byrne, Jr. argued the cause for the Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corporation. With him on the briefs was...

# 19
United States v. State of California, 6, Original (1952)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1952

342 U.S. 891 72 S. Ct. 198 96 L. Ed. 668 UNITED STATES of America, plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 6, Original. Supreme Court of the United States December 3, 1951 Attorney General McGrath, Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech, Messrs. Oscar H. Davis, John F. Davis and Robert M. Vaughan, for the United States. Messrs. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant. The order of February 12, 1949,...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer