Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Jones, Chairman of Navajo Tribal Council of Navajo Indian Tribe v. Healing, Chairman of Hopi Council of Hopi Indian Tribe, Nos. 985 and 1050 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 03, 1963

373 U.S. 758 (1963) JONES, CHAIRMAN OF NAVAJO TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NAVAJO INDIAN TRIBE, v. HEALING, CHAIRMAN OF HOPI COUNCIL OF HOPI INDIAN TRIBE, ET AL. No. 985. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 3, 1963. [*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bernays Wiener for appellant in No. 985 and for appellee Jones in No. 1050. John S. Boyden, Allen H. Tibbals and Bryant H. Croft for appellants in No. 1050 and for appellee...

# 1
Price v. Moss, Nos. 688 and 689 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 10, 1963

374 U.S. 103 (1963) PRICE ET AL. v. MOSS ET AL. No. 688. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1963. [*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. Walt Allen, Jim A. Rinehart, Leon S. Hirsh and James C. Harkin for appellants in No. 688. Frank Carter for appellants in No. 689. Norman E. Reynolds, Jr. and Sid White for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed as the order of the District Court is not...

# 2
Laino v. New York, 992 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 10, 1963

374 U.S. 104 (1963) LAINO v. NEW YORK. No. 992. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 10, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FOURTH JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. Edward H. Levine and Vernon C. Rossner for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Robert E. Fischer and Maxwell B. Spoont, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the...

# 3
Milne v. Rhode Island, 989 (1963)

373 U.S. 542 (1963) MILNE v. RHODE ISLAND. No. 989. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 27, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND. William M. Kunstler for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

# 4
Gonzalez v. Chicago, 984 (1963)

373 U.S. 542 (1963) GONZALEZ ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO. No. 984. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 27, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. Frederic D. Houghteling, George W. Overton, F. Raymond Marks, Jr. and Donald Page Moore for appellants. John C. Melaniphy, Milton P. Webster, Jr. and Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

# 5
Mile Road Corp. v. City of Boston, 981 (1963)

373 U.S. 541 (1963) MILE ROAD CORP. v. CITY OF BOSTON. No. 981. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 27, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS, SUFFOLK COUNTY. Edward M. Dangel and Leo E. Sherry for appellant. William H. Kerr for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

# 6
Auflick v. Wainwright, 979, Misc (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 17, 1963

374 U.S. 494 (1963) AUFLICK v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. No. 979, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 17, 1963. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and A. G. Spicola, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the...

# 7
George v. Clemmons, 975 (1963)

373 U.S. 241 (1963) GEORGE ET AL. v. CLEMMONS, SHERIFF. No. 975. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 13, 1963. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. Robert L. Carter and Johnnie A. Jones for petitioners. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Johnson v. Virginia, ante, p. 61. Cf. Thompson v. Louisville, 362 U.S. 199 .

# 8
Henry v. Rock Hill, 97 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 14, 1963

375 U.S. 6 (1963) HENRY ET AL. v. CITY OF ROCK HILL. No. 97. Supreme Court of United States. Decided October 14, 1963. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr., Donald James Sampson and Willie T. Smith, Jr. for petitioners. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ...

# 9
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 97 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 17, 1963

373 U.S. 372 83 S. Ct. 1312 10 L. Ed. 2d 419 BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. et al. v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. MARYLAND PORT AUTHORITY et al. v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. Nos. 97, 98, and 99. Supreme Court of the United States May 20, 1963 Rehearing Denied June 17, 1963. See 374 U.S. 859 , 83 S. Ct. 1862 . Robert W. Ginnane, Washington, D. C., Jervis Langdon, Jr., and William L. Marbury, Baltimore, Md., for appellants. J....

# 10
Smith v. Kansas, 966, Misc (1963)

373 U.S. 544 (1963) SMITH v. KANSAS ET AL. No. 966, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 27, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. Appellant pro se. William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and Park McGee, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

# 11
United States v. Buffalo Savings Bank, 96 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 07, 1963

371 U.S. 228 (1963) UNITED STATES v. BUFFALO SAVINGS BANK. No. 96. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 3, 1962. Decided January 7, 1963. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. John B. Jones, Jr. argued the cause for the United States. On the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Stephen J. Pollak, Joseph Kovner and George F. Lynch. John Horace Little argued the cause and filed briefs for respondent. Laurens Williams and William Poole...

# 12
Locomotive Engrs. v. L. & NR Co., 94 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 29, 1963

373 U.S. 33 (1963) BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS ET AL. v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. No. 94. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 21, 1963. Decided April 29, 1963. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Harold C. Heiss argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Chas. I. Dawson, Russell B. Day, Harold N. McLaughlin, Wayland K. Sullivan and V. C. Shuttleworth. John P. Sandidge argued the cause for respondent. With him...

# 13
Illinois v. United States, 937 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 17, 1963

373 U.S. 378 83 S. Ct. 1313 10 L. Ed. 2d 420 ILLINOIS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 937. Supreme Court of the United States May 20, 1963 Rehearing Denied June 17, 1963. See 374 U.S. 858 , 83 S. Ct. 1867 . William G. Clark, Atty. Gen. of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Harold A. Cowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., and S. Ashley Guthrie, for appellants. Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender, for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission. James J. Magner, Frederick E....

# 14
Illinois v. United States, 937 (1963)

373 U.S. 378 (1963) ILLINOIS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 937. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 20, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, Edward V. Hanrahan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Harold A. Cowen, Assistant Attorney General, and S. Ashley Guthrie for appellants. Robert W. Ginnane and Stanton P. Sender for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and...

# 15
Yale Transport Corp. v. United States, 936 (1963)

373 U.S. 540 (1963) YALE TRANSPORT CORP. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 936. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 27, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Herbert Burstein for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane, James Y. Piper and Fritz R. Kahn for the United States et al. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

# 16
Atwood's Transport Lines, Inc. v. United States, 935 (1963)

373 U.S. 377 (1963) ATWOOD'S TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 935. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 20, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. James E. Wilson and Edward G. Villalon for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and S. Harrison Kahn for Alexandria, Barcroft & Washington Transit...

# 17
Abernathy v. Carpenter, 905 (1963)

373 U.S. 241 (1963) ABERNATHY ET AL. v. CARPENTER, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE FOR MISSOURI. No. 905. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 13, 1963. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Stanford S. Meyer for appellants. Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General of Missouri, and Robert D. Kingsland and Albert J. Stephan, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

# 18
Cardinal Sporting Goods Co., Inc. v. Eagleton, Attorney General of Missouri, 904 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 17, 1963

374 U.S. 496 83 S. Ct. 1866 10 L. Ed. 2d 1043 CARDINAL SPORTING GOODS CO., Inc., et al. v. EAGLETON, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. No. 904. Supreme Court of the United States June 17, 1963 Norman Diamond, for appellants. Samuel H. Liberman, for appellees. PER CURIAM. 1 It appearing from the motion to dismiss that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri is vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the...

# 19
Lynumn v. Illinois, 9 (1963)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 25, 1963

372 U.S. 528 (1963) LYNUMN v. ILLINOIS. No. 9. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 19, 1963. Decided March 25, 1963. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. Jewel Lafontant argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William G. Clark, Attorney General, and Raymond S. Sarnow, A. Zola Groves and Edward A. Berman, Assistant Attorneys General. *529 MR....

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer