When a nation declares martial law, civil authority will be suspended and replaced by military rule. This usually happens as a response to a significant disaster. This article gives a general overview of martial law and how the U.S. has used it in the past.
Martial law, an act of last resort, occurs when the military government substitutes the civil government during certain emergencies. When it can be invoked and other specifics have not been defined explicitly in American law, however. The Supreme Court, in Duncan v. Kahanamoku, did not explain what the term “martial law" is. However, the martial laws declared in the past carry similar features, including:
Martial law has rarely been invoked in the U.S. The last time it was used was in Hawaii, following the Pearl Harbor attack. Prior to that, it was used a few times in the early 20th Century. President Abraham Lincoln used it during the Civil war. It was also invoked during the war of 1812 in New Orleans by General Andrew Jackson.
There are also other times where presidents used the military to maintain order, but not under martial law. Rather they used the Insurrection Act, an act that allows presidents to use the military. Some of the instances where this Act was used include:
There is no constitutional provision that specifically talks about who has the power to declare martial law. The following Constitutional provisions are, however, often interpreted to allow both the President and Congress to declare martial law.
This section of the Constitution states Congress has the power to “provide for calling forth the militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel Invasions."
This section states, “the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States."
In addition to the above, governors may also declare martial law in their state, if the state's constitution allows them to do so.
A pandemic may kill more Americans than an actual war. The COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, could kill 100,000- 200,000 Americans, according to the nation's expert on infectious diseases. But is that enough to warrant a declaration of martial law?
Martial law has never been declared as a response to a pandemic in American history. Even though the Supreme Court did not specifically hand out the criteria for declaring martial law, it has highlighted that martial law should only be justified in extreme cases and only as a last resort.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a number of governors have called up their national guard to help assist with essential duties. But, in such cases, the guards' role was to assist civil authorities, not replace them.
As there is no legal precedent (either in the Constitution or cases) on when the President can declare martial law, it is difficult to answer whether a President can declare martial law for a pandemic. But the possibility of it happening in acute domestic disasters like the COVID-19 pandemic can't be ruled out.
Contracr for Hire
I was in a contract for hire agreement where the contract listed and recognized my IP. The agreement was signed a little over a year ago. The contract does indicate a license for my IP but only recently did I send the license to the client. The client refuses to sign the agreement what can I do?
custody of nephew
my sister is homless and about to give birth to her second son, her first does not live with her.legal custody was granted to pat. grandma, due to missing court and she is on the CPS list for leaving my 3 year old and 1 year old home by theirselves last year and they let themselves out the door and into the road. I was never charged with anything because i was at work when the incident occured. She has no way to support the new child, nor anything for him at all. I want to assume custody of my nephew when he is born, which could be any day now. Will a court grant me a temporary custody order if my sister gives me the baby when she leaves the hospital? There is no one else on either side of the childs family that is able to take him for her. she has already agreed to let me have him for a day or so but i dont want to just give him back to her knowing she has no way to support him or provide for him. baby's father is slightly involved but has no way to care for him either, no home and about to go to jai. What can i do to protect my nephew.
lawsuit against S. Corp.
Can you also sue and individual owner of an S. Corp?