Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Ainslee R Ferdie
Ainslee R Ferdie
Visitors: 75
0
Bar #24273(FL)     License for 70 years
Coral Gables FL

Are you Ainslee R Ferdie? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 1008.221012.331012.341012.795120.536120.54120.569120.5720.165455.2273475.624475.629627.8405642.041

Florida Administrative Code: 61J1-8.002

88-003376BID  CAPITAL COPY, INC. vs. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 27, 1988
The issues presented concern themselves with whether the University of Florida (University) in the preparation of its Invitation to Bid, Bid No. 88J- 112YC and examination of the responses to the invitation established a bid solicitation process which is reasonable and competitive. The other question for consideration is whether Capital Copy, Inc. (Capital) is entitled to the contract award under the terms of the Invitation to Bid.Bid dispute concerning purchase of copy machines. Price is not always the determining factor in ranking responses to RFP.
76-002141  DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs. PORTER REALTY, INC.; IRVIN WILLIAM PORTER; ET AL.  (1976)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 31, 1977
Real estate brokers reprimanded where their violations had no adverse affects on any member of the public. Their actions were negligent.
76-000212  AMERICAN FOAM RUBBER DISTRIBUTORS, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE  (1976)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 21, 1976
By this petition, American Foam Rubber Distributors, Inc. (AFRD) and Edward Rothbard seek to have the Department of Revenue's assessment for documentary stamp tax and penalties on a transfer of real property by quit claim deed from Edward Rothbard to AFRD set aside. Petitioners contend that the transfer was without consideration and therefore nontaxable under sec. 201.02, F.S. , while Respondent contends that consideration flowed to the grantor by virtue of the grantee making the mortgage payments; and therefore, documentary tax stamps were due on the deed of conveyance computed on the amount of the mortgage at the time of transfer. One witness testified in behalf of Petitioners and four exhibits were admitted into evidence. From the pleadings, interrogatories and evidence presented at the hearing, the facts are largely undisputed and are as follows:Petitioner owes penalties and tax on transfer of real estate from self to corporation. Include the amount of the mortgage.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer