Leon FL Lawyers | Andrew Rubin Fier -- eLawyers

Andrew Rubin Fier

Visitors: 70

850-717-1240

Bar #84985(FL) License for 14 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Andrew Rubin Fier? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 26 U.S.C 5702, 5 U.S.C 504

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 17.001, 20.165, 210.01, 210.02, 210.25, 210.276, 210.30, 210.55, 210.75, 287.001, 287.012, 287.057, 381.986, 386.203, 455.225, 455.227, 455.2273, 475.01, 475.011, 475.15, 475.25, 475.42, 489.129, 489.1425, 55.10, 55.202, 55.203, 55.205, 561.15, 561.181, 561.27, 561.29, 561.32, 561.65, 562.11, 569.002, 57.105, 57.111, 679.2031, 679.3091, 679.3171, 695.01, 721.20, 726.105, 726.108, 726.109, 726.110, 823.12, 945.025, 945.215, 95.11

19-000126BID SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 07, 2019

Whether Respondent’s intended decision to award a contract to Intervenor, Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL), for telecommunication services pursuant to an “INVITATION TO NEGOTIATE FOR INMATE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES FDC ITN-17-122” (the ITN), is contrary to Respondent’s governing statutes, its rules, or the ITN specifications; and, if so, whether it was contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, arbitrary, or capricious.Petitioner failed to prove Respondent acted contrary to its governing statutes, rules or policies, and did not demonstrate the ITN process was illegal, arbitrary, dishonest or fradulent.

16-003160RU GRABBA-LEAF, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 08, 2016

The issue is whether the Respondent has made a statement regarding the taxability of “whole leaf, non-homogenized” cigar wraps that meets the definition of a rule, without adopting the statement as a rule, as required by sections 120.54 and 120.56(4), Florida Statutes (2016).1/DBPR statement that "non-homogenized whole leaf tobacco wraps" meets statutory definition of "loose tobacco suitable for smoking" is not a rule.

16-000344F BOCA VIEW CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 21, 2016

Whether Petitioner is entitled to attorney's fees and costs as a prevailing small business party pursuant to section 57.111, Florida Statutes (2015),1/ and, if so, in what amount.Although agency withdrew Administrative Complaint after filing, agency action was substantially justified at time of filing and no attorney fees were appropriate.

13-000143PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs MOUNIR ALBERT EL BEYROUTY (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 11, 2013

The issue in this case is whether the Florida Real Estate Commission should discipline the Respondent, Mounir Albert El Beyrouty, on charges that he failed to deliver rental proceeds, was dishonest in his dealings regarding the rental property, failed to escrow rental deposits and proceeds, and failed to properly reconcile his escrow account.Real estate broker was dishonest in managing rental property, failed to deliver rental proceeds, failed to escrow, and failed to reconcile escrow account.

11-002797PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs JORDAN TAL KOHN (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2011

Whether Respondent abandoned a construction job, and whether Respondent failed to include a statement of consumer's rights in a contract; if so, whether (and what) discipline should be imposed against Respondent's general contractor's license.Petitioner did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent had abandoned a construction project. Petitioner did prove that Respondent had not provided notice to the consumer of the Homeowner's Construction Industry Recovery Fund.

12-003867 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs 7 ELEVEN, INC., AND PTL ASSOCIATES, INC., D/B/A 7 ELEVEN STORE NO. 32599A (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 29, 2012

Whether the Respondent committed the offense alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated August 14, 2012, and, if so, what penalties, if any, should be imposed.Respondent sold beer to underage purchaser.

12-000359PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs FRANK RHODEN, P.A. (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 23, 2012

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint in the manner specified therein and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner did not meet burden of proving that Respondent acted outside the scope of his licensure or that he misrepresented his licensure status, but did prove that he committed a breach of trust by storing his property in listed unit.

12-000066PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs CORY AUSTIN LEVY (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2012

12-000525PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION vs ARMANDO PALMA, III (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 08, 2012

12-001223PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs BARRIE GOLDMAN (2012)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 2012