Leon FL Administrative law, Banking and Government contracts -- eLawyers

17-4428 LEON BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 22, 2018

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LEON BROWN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4428 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _) Opinion filed August 22, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Ransone v. State, 48 So. 3d 692 (Fla. 2010); Mount v. State, 97 So. 3d 951 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012); Cre..

1D10-6285 Haridopolos v. CITIZENS FOR STRONG SCH. (2011)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 23, 2011 Citations: 78 So. 3d 605

78 So. 3d 605 (2011) Mike HARIDOPOLOS, in his official capacity as the Florida Senate President; Dean Cannon, in his official capacity as the Florida Speaker of the House of Representatives; Dr. Eric J. Smith, in his official capacity as Florida Commissioner of Education; and Florida State Board of Education, Petitioners, v. CITIZENS FOR STRONG SCHOOLS, INC.; Fund Education Now; Eunice Barnum; Janiyah Williams; Jacque Williams; Sheila Andrews; Rose Nogueras; and Alfredo Nogueras, Respondents. No...

1D10-2337 Cargile v. State (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 2010 Citations: 41 So. 3d 892

41 So. 3d 892 (2010) CARGILE v. STATE. No. 1D10-2337. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 5, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.

4D08-2829 Fulmore v. State (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 24, 2008 Citations: 989 So. 2d 648

989 So. 2d 648 (2008) FULMORE v. STATE. No. 4D08-2829. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. September 24, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

92-006271 BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs ANGELA MARIA WYNTER (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 20, 1992

At issue in this proceeding is whether respondent committed the offenses set forth in the administrative complaint and, if so, what disciplinary action should be imposed.Mere combing out of client's hair did not constitute hair arranging and th refore respondent did not practice cosmetology without a license.

91-007994 BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS vs SHRINIVAS K. NAYAK (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 13, 1991

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Respondent is guilty of negligence or misconduct in the practice of engineering, involving his submittal of an allegedly substandard design concerning a waste-water treatment and disposal facility for an entity known as the "Jefferson Nursing Center" (JNC) and whether, if such is established, he is subject to discipline for violating the charged provisions of Chapter 471, Florida Statutes, and the extent of that discipline.Prelim. design submitted for permit negotiating purposes must still comply w/std. engineer practice even if not signed & sealed. Design deficient-negl

93-006170 BOARD OF PILOT COMMISSIONERS vs WARWICK G. CAHILL (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 1993

Whether the Respondent failed to meet acceptable standards of safe pilotage as alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty is appropriate.Pilot's unintended gesture was interpreted as a direction change and ship ran aground-evidence failed to prove misconduct, etc. Pilot was not inattentive.

92-003112 BOARD OF AUCTIONEERS vs RONALD RAY KOOL, D/B/A A-PLUS AUCTIONS (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 1992

As stipulated by the parties and as reflected in the Amended Administrative Complaint dated September 28, 1992 the issues for resolution are whether Respondent misrepresented property for sale at auction or made false promises concerning the use, value or condition of such property; whether this conduct demonstrates bad faith or dishonesty; whether Respondent failed to appropriately conduct and maintain control of the auction; and whether the Respondent used false bidders, cappers or shills. (Joint Prehearing Statement filed 9/28/92) If those violations occurred, an appropriate penalty must be determined.No violation found as respondent announced auction rules properly, kept applicant's records, described goods for sale, and properly controlled auction.

93-000270 BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs DELIA URRUTIA (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 21, 1993

By Administrative Complaint dated March 24, 1992, Petitioner alleged that Respondent applied a full set of acrylic nails to Sharon Seamon; that Ms.$300 fine and reprimand for cosmetologist's failure to diagnose nail fungus under full set of acrylic nails applied by respondent.

Anthony Cammarata