Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 1989
Procedural and Evidentiary Matters At Formal Hearing, Petitioner and Respondent made several motions to limit testimony of certain witnesses. Specifically, Petitioner filed a Motion in Limine to exclude the testimony of Respondent's expert, Charles Rudolph, D.O., and Respondent filed a Motion in Limine to limit the testimony of Petitioner's expert, Mark Montgomery, Ph.D. In addition, Respondent filed a Memorandum of Law in Support of Expert Testimony of Charles Rudolph, D.O. Petitioner's Motion in Limine regarding Dr. Rudolph was denied, it being determined that Dr. Rudolph was qualified to testify as an expert herein pursuant to Section 768.45 F.S. Respondent's Motion in Limine regarding Dr. Montgomery, who is neither a medical nor osteopathic physician, was granted. Accordingly, the testimony of Dr.Experimental medicine, malpractice, deceptive representations, and excessive influence charges not proven; Doctor disciplined on medical records; chelation.
