welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Benjamin R Welling
Benjamin R Welling
Benjamin R Welling
Visitors: 52
0
Bar #16286(FL)     License for 20 years
Seminole FL

Are you Benjamin R Welling? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 112.531, 112.532, 112.533, 112.534, 120.569, 120.57, 316.072

09-3473  Murphy v. FedEx Nat. LTL, Inc.  (2010)
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: Aug. 26, 2010 Citations: 618 F.3d 893
618 F.3d 893 (2010) Susan A. MURPHY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. FEDEX NATIONAL LTL, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 09-3473, 09-3518. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: June 15, 2010. Filed: August 26, 2010. *896 William E. Grob, argued, Tampa, FL, Benjamin R. Welling, Phoenix, AR, on the brief, for appellant/cross-appellee. John Lynn, argued, St. Louis, MO, for appellee/cross-appellant. Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Appell..
1D09-5546  Pearson v. City of Pensacola  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 06, 2010 Citations: 32 So. 3d 626
32 So. 3d 626 (2010) PEARSON v. CITY OF PENSACOLA. No. 1D09-5546. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 6, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Certiorari denied.
08-002834  PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF`S OFFICE vs JILL CASEY  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 2008
The issue in this case is whether Jill Casey (Respondent) violated personnel rules adopted by the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office (Petitioner), and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent violated Petitioner`s policies related to sexual harassment, hostile work environment, and respect towards colleagues. Discipline is warranted.
07-003719  PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF`S OFFICE vs JOHN BRADSHAW  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 20, 2007
The issues to be determined in this case are whether Respondent, Deputy John Bradshaw, engaged in conduct prohibited by the rules promulgated by Petitioner, Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office, and, if so, whether the disciplinary action taken against Deputy Bradshaw was consistent with action taken against other members of the Sheriff’s Office.Respondent was shown to have violated a regulation requiring exercise of due regard for the safety of all persons when, during a pursuit, he did not slow down sufficiently when entering an intersection on a red light, which resulted in a crash.
07-001124  PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF`S OFFICE vs DIANE CROSS  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 2007
Whether Respondent, Diane Cross, violated General Order 3- 1.1, Rule 5.4 (Duties and Responsibilities), by obtaining and giving Robaxin, a prescription medication, to David Richardson on July 31, 2006. Whether Respondent violated General Order 3-1.1, Rule 5.6 (Truthfulness), during the criminal and internal investigation into her conduct on July 31, 2006.Petitioner has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent gave prescription medicine to another nurse, without a prescription; and then was untruthful during the investigation. Recommend Respondent`s termination.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer