welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Betty C Zachem
Betty C Zachem
Betty C Zachem
Visitors: 210
0
Bar #25821(FL)     License for 19 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Betty C Zachem? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

20-003094BID  QUAIL ROOST TRANSIT VILLAGE I, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 13, 2020
The issues are whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2020-208 (“RFA”), titled “SAIL and Housing Credit Financing for the Construction of Workforce Housing,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications and, if so, whether the challenged award was contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, or arbitrary and/or capricious.Petitioner proved that Intervenor's application was ineligible for funding due to failure to disclose all principals and failure to provide accurate coordinates for scattered sites.
21-000515BID  FLETCHER BLACK II, LLC, MADISON GROVE, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC, vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.
21-000516BID  MADISON GROVE, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.
21-000517BID  MADISON OAKS EAST, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.
21-000518BID  MADISON OAKS WEST, LLC AND ARC 2020, LLC AND NEW SOUTH RESIDENTIAL, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.
21-000520BID  TIMSHEL WALTON HOUSING, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2021
The issues to be determined are whether, with respect to each application filed, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (Florida Housing) review and decision-making process in response to the Request for Applications 2020-201 (RFA) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, the agency’s rules or policies, or the RFA.Florida Housing's determination that two applicants demonstrated committed funding from the same jurisdiction was clearly erroneous; determination that errors in another application were a minor waivable irregularity was supported by evidence.
21-000725BID  HTG ASTORIA, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2021
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) preliminary award of funding to University Station I, LLC (“University Station”), was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or RFA specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Florida Housing's proposed award to University Station was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.
21-000726BID  MHP FL VIII, LLLP vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2021
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) preliminary award of funding to University Station I, LLC (“University Station”), was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or RFA specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Florida Housing's proposed award to University Station was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.
21-000727BID  VISTA AT COCONUT PALM, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2021
Whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s (“Florida Housing”) preliminary award of funding to University Station I, LLC (“University Station”), was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary or capricious, or contrary to Florida Housing’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or RFA specifications.Petitioner failed to carry its burden of demonstrating that Florida Housing's proposed award to University Station was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer