Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Brent McNeal
Brent McNeal
Visitors: 60
0
Bar #73109(FL)     License for 15 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Brent McNeal? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :
17-3255  LENORA ALLEN-JOHNSON v. U.S. BANK, N.A.  (2018)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT LENORA ALLEN-JOHNSON, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, successor trustee to Bank of America, National Association, successor in interest to LaSalle Bank National Association, on behalf of the registered holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007- AQ2, Appellee. No. 4D17-3255 [February 22, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward ..
4D15-1761  Antonio Osborne and Angelia Osborne v. Gregory Emmer, Trustee of the Equitymax, Inc. Pension Plan  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 2016
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ANTONIO OSBORNE and ANGELIA OSBORNE, Appellants, v. GREGORY EMMER, TRUSTEE OF THE EQUITYMAX, INC. PENSION PLAN, Appellee. No. 4D15-1761 [February 3, 2016] Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Thomas Barkdull, III, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2009CA026064XXXXMB. Tim B. Wright of Wright, Ponsoldt & Lozeau Trial Attorneys, L.L.P., Stuart, for appellant. Laurel R. Wiley and L..
11-005078RX  MICHELLE HATLEY vs DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 04, 2011
The issue in this case is whether rule 6A-4.0021(6)(c)1. is invalid because Respondent exceeded its grant of rulemaking authority, as alleged by Petitioner.Revised rule challenge petition failed to specify supportable grounds to invalidate existing rule 6A-4.0021(6)(c)1.; motion for summary final order granted and rule challenge dismissed.
11-001263PL  DR. ERIC J. SMITH, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs CASEY GRIFFITH  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 11, 2011
The issue to be determined is whether Respondent violated section 1012.795(1)(d) and (f), Florida Statutes (2008), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty should be imposed?Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated section 1012.795(1)(d) and (f). Recommend suspension, probation, evaluation and fine.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer