welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Bruce Alexander Minnick
Bruce Alexander Minnick
Bruce Alexander Minnick
Visitors: 96
11
Bar #250295(FL)     License for 47 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Bruce Alexander Minnick? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 42 U.S.C 2000E

Florida Laws: 104.31, 110.205, 110.402, 110.403, 112.31, 112.312, 112.313, 112.3145, 112.322, 112.532, 112.533, 112.534, 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.56, 120.565, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 120.69, 509.092, 517.021, 517.12, 517.221, 517.301, 57.041, 57.105, 57.111, 626.207, 626.611, 626.621, 626.631, 626.8437, 626.854, 626.869, 626.8698, 633.128, 7.221, 72.011, 721.02, 721.05, 721.056, 721.06, 721.07, 721.11, 721.111, 721.23, 721.26, 760.01, 760.02, 760.10, 760.11, 775.08, 775.082, 943.1397

Florida Administrative Code: 6C3-10.211, 6C3-10.232, 6C-5.940

93-007083  MARY J. POTASEK vs FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 15, 1993
Whether Respondent, The Florida State University, discriminated against Petitioner, Mary J. Potasek, on the basis of her sex and marital status as alleged in the Petition for Relief filed by Petitioner.Petitioner failed to prove University considered her sex or marital status in refusing to offer her a position.
93-001523EC  IN RE: JAMES R. ENGLISH vs *  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 18, 1993
On October 20, 1992, the State of Florida Commission on Ethics issued its order finding probable cause that ...Respondent, as City Attorney for the City of Tallahassee and an employee of the City, violated Section 112.313(3) by assigning legal work to the law firm in which he was a partner and for which legal work the City paid the law firm, and Section 112.313(7)(a) by holding a one-sixth ownership interest in a law firm doing business with the City. The issue is whether those violations occurred and, if so, what discipline or penalty is appropriate.Respondent violated ethics code as a city attny when he retained an interest in a law firm and referred city business to that firm.
92-004941EC  IN RE: HUGH HARLING vs *  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 1992
In an order dated July 24, 1991, the Florida Commission on Ethics found probable cause that Respondent violated sections 112.3143(2)(b) and 112.3143(3), by twice participating in, and voting on measures (land use changes) which inured to his special private gain or to the special gain of a principal by whom he was retained. The issue is whether those violations occurred, and if so, what penalty is appropriate.Respondent had not been retained nor was he aware of ownership interest by his principal when he voted on measures benefitting that principal.
14-001492  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF FUNERAL, CEMETERY, AND CONSUMER SERVICES vs ALL POINTS REMOVAL SERVICE, LLC  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 02, 2014

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer