Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Bruce Michael Bachman Jr.
Bruce Michael Bachman Jr.
Visitors: 28
0
Bar #14139(FL)     License for 19 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Bruce Michael Bachman Jr.? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

05-000717GM  ELOISE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, BRUCE BACHMAN AND JOHNNY BROOKS vs POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 28, 2005
The issues in this case are whether the Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 05S-01 (the Plan Amendment) adopted by Polk County (County) through the enactment of Ordinance No. 05-004 is “in compliance,” as that term is defined by Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes,1 and whether Petitioner, Citizens for Proper Planning, Inc. (CPPI), has standing as an “affected person” as defined by Section 163.3184(1)(a), Florida Statutes, in this proceeding.Petitioners proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the small scale development plan amendment to the Future Land Use Map was inconsistent with the County`s Comprehensive Plan.
05-000787GM  CITIZENS FOR PROPER PLANNING, INC. vs POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 03, 2005
The issues in this case are whether the Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. 05S-01 (the Plan Amendment) adopted by Polk County (County) through the enactment of Ordinance No. 05-004 is “in compliance,” as that term is defined by Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes,1 and whether Petitioner, Citizens for Proper Planning, Inc. (CPPI), has standing as an “affected person” as defined by Section 163.3184(1)(a), Florida Statutes, in this proceeding.Petitioners proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the small scale development plan amendment to the Future Land Use Map was inconsistent with the County`s Comprehensive Plan.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer