Broward FL Lawyers | Bruce S Rogow -- eLawyers - eLawyers.us

Bruce S Rogow

Visitors: 69

0

Bar #67999(FL) License for 29 years; Member in Good Standing

Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Bruce S Rogow? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Brownlee v. State of Florida (1928)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 1928 Citations: 116 So. 618, 95 Fla. 775

In this case the plaintiffs in error were indicted on a charge of murder in the first degree in St. Lucie County, being in the Twenty-first Judicial Circuit of Florida. They were charged with the murder of Perley Sylvester Thomas and were all charged as principals. The *Page 777 judge of that Circuit advised the Governor that he was disqualified to try the case. The Governor assigned another circuit judge to proceed to St. Lucie County and dispose of such cases which it might appear that Judge Th..

Armour Fertilizer Wks. v. Wade Inv. Co. (1925)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 1925 Citations: 105 So. 819, 90 Fla. 403

In foreclosure proceedings brought by N. G. Wade Investment Company, a corporation, against *Page 404 S. G. Gay and wife and Armour Fertilizer Works, a corporation, it appears that Gay and wife executed to N. G. Wade Investment Company a mortgage upon real estate to secure the payment of designated notes, the mortgage containing a covenant that the mortgagor "will keep the dwelling house and barn on said lands insured in some standard insurance company or companies, in the sum of $2,000.00 each, ..

Armour Fertilizer Wks. v. Wade Inv. Co. (1925)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 1925 Citations: 105 So. 819, 90 Fla. 403

In foreclosure proceedings brought by N. G. Wade Investment Company, a corporation, against *Page 404 S. G. Gay and wife and Armour Fertilizer Works, a corporation, it appears that Gay and wife executed to N. G. Wade Investment Company a mortgage upon real estate to secure the payment of designated notes, the mortgage containing a covenant that the mortgagor "will keep the dwelling house and barn on said lands insured in some standard insurance company or companies, in the sum of $2,000.00 each, ..

Douglas v. Webber (1930)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 1930 Citations: 128 So. 613, 99 Fla. 755

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 The appeal herein is from the following decree of the Circuit Court: "Heretofore this Court entered an order awarding a temporary injunction restraining the holding of the election as called by the Board of County Commissioners under and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 14217. Thereafter, F. W. Ditto and certain other citizens undertook to intervene, and w..

Douglas v. Webber (1930)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 1930 Citations: 128 So. 613, 99 Fla. 755

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 The appeal herein is from the following decree of the Circuit Court: "Heretofore this Court entered an order awarding a temporary injunction restraining the holding of the election as called by the Board of County Commissioners under and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 14217. Thereafter, F. W. Ditto and certain other citizens undertook to intervene, and w..

Douglas v. Webber (1930)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 1930 Citations: 128 So. 613, 99 Fla. 755

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 The appeal herein is from the following decree of the Circuit Court: "Heretofore this Court entered an order awarding a temporary injunction restraining the holding of the election as called by the Board of County Commissioners under and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 14217. Thereafter, F. W. Ditto and certain other citizens undertook to intervene, and w..

Douglas v. Webber (1930)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 1930 Citations: 128 So. 613, 99 Fla. 755

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 The appeal herein is from the following decree of the Circuit Court: "Heretofore this Court entered an order awarding a temporary injunction restraining the holding of the election as called by the Board of County Commissioners under and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 14217. Thereafter, F. W. Ditto and certain other citizens undertook to intervene, and w..

Douglas v. Webber (1930)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 1930 Citations: 128 So. 613, 99 Fla. 755

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 The appeal herein is from the following decree of the Circuit Court: "Heretofore this Court entered an order awarding a temporary injunction restraining the holding of the election as called by the Board of County Commissioners under and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 14217. Thereafter, F. W. Ditto and certain other citizens undertook to intervene, and w..

Douglas v. Webber (1930)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Apr. 08, 1930 Citations: 128 So. 613, 99 Fla. 755

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 757 The appeal herein is from the following decree of the Circuit Court: "Heretofore this Court entered an order awarding a temporary injunction restraining the holding of the election as called by the Board of County Commissioners under and pursuant to the terms of Chapter 14217. Thereafter, F. W. Ditto and certain other citizens undertook to intervene, and w..

State Ex Rel. v. McLeod (1939)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 14, 1939 Citations: 139 Fla. 287, 190 So. 596

Plaintiff in error, a milk distributor, was arrested for refilling and offering for sale the contents of a milk bottle bearing the trade name of another. The milk contents of the bottle was properly labeled by the plaintiff in error with his name, grade, and classification of the milk as required by law. He was on habeas corpus remanded to the custody of the defendant in error and sued out this writ of error. The sole question is whether or not the legislature can punish by fine and imprisonment ..

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Ask a Question

Search for lawyers by practice areas.

Find a Lawyer