Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
C Anthony Cleveland
C Anthony Cleveland
Visitors: 45
0

Free initial consultation

Bar #217859(FL)     License for 48 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you C Anthony Cleveland? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

83-2698  McCall v. State  (1985)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 1985 Citations: 463 So. 2d 425
463 So. 2d 425 (1985) Marlon S. McCALL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 83-2698. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. February 5, 1985. *426 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender; and Loren H. Cohen and Julian S. Mack, Sp. Appointed Public Defenders, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael Neiman and Richard Doran, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee. Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ. BASKIN, Judge. The primary issue presented in this appeal from a robb..
2D07-1333  Rw v. State, Dent. of Children & Family Services  (2007)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 20, 2007 Citations: 965 So. 2d 134
965 So. 2d 134 (2007) R.W. v. STATE, DENT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES No. 2D07-1333. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. September 20, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Cert. dismissed.
10-003807  CONSERVATION ALLIANCE OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, INC., AND TREASURE COAST ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., A/K/A INDIAN RIVERKEEPER, INC. vs ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPORATION, CHEM-TEX SUPPLY CORPORATION AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 27, 2010
The issue to be determined by this Recommended Order of Dismissal is whether the Petitioners have standing to challenge a Settlement Agreement in OGC File No. 07-0177 (the Settlement Agreement), entered into by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Respondents, Allied Universal Corporation (Allied) and Chem-Tex Supply Corporation (Chem-Tex), for the assessment and remediation of contamination at a bleach- manufacturing and chlorine-repackaging facility in St. Lucie County.Petitioners failed to prove that they had standing under s. 120.569 and, since section 403.412(6) is not applicable to enforcement proceedings, and failed to prove that they had standing.
09-001588  CONSERVATION ALLIANCE OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, INC., AND ELAINE ROMANO vs FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 2009
The issue to be determined by this Order is whether the Petition for Formal Proceedings filed with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) on February 4, 2009, was timely 1/ and, if so, whether Petitioners have standing to challenge the DEP?s issuance of the Minor Modification to FDEP Operation Permit 171331-002-UO for IW-1 under 171331-003-UC (the Permit Modification).The Petition for Formal Proceeding was not timely filed and Petitioners failed to prove that they had standing as substantially affected persons. Although, Conservation Alliance proved standing under section 403.412(6), the Petitions should be dismissed.
99-003096  FLORIDA CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB AND SAVE OUR SUWANNEE, INC. vs SUWANNEE AMERICAN CEMENT COMPANY, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 1999
The issue is whether the Petition for Administrative Hearing should be dismissed for failure to state a cause cognizable under Florida Law.Rules related to water quality criteria and Outstanding Florida Water standards do not apply to an application for an air construction permit.
99-003424BID  NEEL MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. vs FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY AND BOARD OF REGENTS  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 1999
Whether the Florida A&M University's intended action to reject all bids and re-advertise the project to construct "Utilities Improvement-Central Chilled Water Plant, Phase V", known as BR-389, is illegal, arbitrary, dishonest, or fraudulent.Petitioner failed to prove that the decision by Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University to reject all bids was illegal, arbitrary, fraudulent, or dishonest. The bid protest should be dismissed.
89-003760  ESCAMBIA COUNTY vs TRANSPAC, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1989)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 13, 1989
The issue at the hearing was whether Respondent, Trans Pac, Inc. is entitled to a construction permit to build a hazardous waste treatment and storage facility in Escambia County, Florida.Hazardous waste permit-fact that facility advertised for sale does not abrogate reasonable assurance where no sale eminent-siting process independent of permit process
88-001220  WUESTHOFF HOSPITAL vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 30, 1989
The issue in this case is whether the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services should grant a certificate of need to Jess Parrish Memorial Hospital for the conversion of 16 medical/surgical beds into 16 adult short-term psychiatric beds.Certificate Of Need for 16 short-term psychiatric beds despite publication of fixed need pool of 0 due to errors in calculation and deviation from normal policy in calculations
86-001846  RICHARD SLUGGETT vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION COMMISSION  (1986)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 18, 1986
The issue presented for decision herein is whether or not Petitioner, Department of Transportation, (DOT), is entitled to issuance of a dredge and fill permit for installation of triple box culverts over the Callery Judge Canal, between the 20 mile bend and State Road 7 on State Road 80, Palm Beach County, Florida.Recommended issuance of dredge and fill permit; proposed activities found to be not contrary to public interest.
85-002731  MANASOTA-88, INC. vs. MANATEE COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1985)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 05, 1986
Respondent proved confinement of injection zone and standards for proposed Class I deep injection/test well. Respondent is entitled to DER`s construction permit.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer