Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Carol Ann Ruebsamen
Carol Ann Ruebsamen
Visitors: 41
0
Bar #380946(FL)     License for 41 years; Member in Good Standing
Pensacola FL

Are you Carol Ann Ruebsamen? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

87-2220  Fladell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.  (1989)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 31, 1989 Citations: 544 So. 2d 1056
544 So. 2d 1056 (1989) Andre FLADELL, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Etc., Appellee. No. 87-2220. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. May 31, 1989. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1989. David & French, P.A., Boca Raton, and Philip Burlington and Edna L. Caruso of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant. Frank W. Weathers of Weathers & Seaman, Lantana, for appellee. PER CURIAM. This appeal involves a construction of section 627.727(6), Florid..
2D08-2990  Lee v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 21, 2008 Citations: 995 So. 2d 967
995 So. 2d 967 (2008) LEE v. STATE. No. 2D08-2990. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. November 21, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
86-795, 86-796  Hudson v. State  (1986)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 14, 1986 Citations: 504 So. 2d 2
504 So. 2d 2 (1986) John Daniel HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 86-795, 86-796. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. November 14, 1986. Rehearing Denied February 12, 1987. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Karla Foreman Wright, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals from his sentences for possession and ..
88-006158  ALTON OCHSNER MEDICAL FOUNDATION AND OCHSNER CLINIC vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES AND HOSPITAL CARE COST CONTAINMENT BOARD  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 01, 1990
The general issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Petitioners should be paid for medical services rendered to a baby, William Murrell ("Baby M"). Embodied within that general issue is the question of whether the Respondent, children's Medical Services ("CMS"), agreed to pay the Petitioners ("Ochsner"); whether CMS is estopped to deny such reimbursement to Ochsner; whether CMS's pre-authorization requirements are conditions precedent to reimbursement; and whether reimbursement is precluded for experimental procedures and, indeed, whether the procedure involved herein was experimental at all.Evidence showed Doctor who made decision in emergency situation to transfer infant to out of state hospial had authority as Emergency Medicine Specialist consultant, Neonatal specialist.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer