welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Carrie Stolzer Robinson
Carrie Stolzer Robinson
Carrie Stolzer Robinson
Visitors: 68
0
Bar #354030(FL)     License for 24 years; Member in Good Standing
Boca Raton FL

Are you Carrie Stolzer Robinson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 760.02, 760.10

17-005067  MICHAEL HARRISON vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.
17-005069  MARK SMITHERS vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.
17-005071  CODY LUCAS vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.
17-005073  DAVID OKKER vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.
17-005075  MARVIN L. RAGLAND vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.
17-005077  JACOB P. MILLER vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.
17-005079  KYLIE SMITHERS vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.
17-005081  FAITH TAPPAN vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 15, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.
17-005411  BERNARD BROOKS vs THE MG HERRING GROUP, INC.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 28, 2017
Whether Respondent, The MG Herring Group, Inc. (MG Herring), was an employer of Petitioners.Employees/Petitioners did not prove three requirements for "joint employment." Also, did not prove discharge because of retaliation or sex. Discharged because contract ended.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer