Pinellas FL Appeals and Litigation Lawyers | Charles W. Gerd -- eLawyers

17-3102 Tondrick Jakal Hall v. State of Florida (2018)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2018

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D17-3102 _ TONDRICK JAKAL HALL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Linda F. McCallum, Judge. April 13, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. WETHERELL, ROWE, and JAY, JJ., concur. _ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _ Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela J..

Ago (1981)

Florida Attorney General Reports Filed: Nov. 18, 1981

Mr. John A. Madigan, Jr. General Counsel, Florida Sheriffs Association QUESTION: Pursuant to s. 219.075 , F.S. (1980 Supp.), may a sheriff's office invest surplus funds in a `Government Fund' created and managed by a commercial investment firm SUMMARY: Section 219.075 , F.S. (1980 Supp.), does not authorize a sheriff's office to invest its surplus funds in a `Government Fund' created and managed by a commercial investment firm even though the prospectus of such firm provides that the fund it is ..

12-2977 & 12-2457 Kritchman v. Wolk (2014)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 01, 2014

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 1, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D12-2977 & 3D12-2457 Lower Tribunal No. 11-10587 _ William Kritchman, etc., et al., Appellants/Cross-Appellees, vs. Hunter Wolk, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge. Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart and Jack J. Aiello and John C. Moran; Heller Waldman, Glen H. Waldman and Eleanor T. Barne..

5D09-4615 Buggs v. State (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2010 Citations: 27 So. 3d 773

27 So. 3d 773 (2010) Trod O. BUGGS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 5D09-4615. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 12, 2010. Trod O. Buggs, Crawfordville, pro se. *774 Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Wesley Heidt, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion will be filed with the lower court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the order ..

86-1619 Ward v. Ward (1987)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 27, 1987 Citations: 502 So. 2d 477

502 So. 2d 477 (1987) Kathryn Elliot WARD, Appellant, v. Espy E. WARD, Appellee. No. 86-1619. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 27, 1987. Rehearing Denied March 10, 1987. Harold M. Braxton and Patricia Ann Ash, Miami, for appellant. Joseph R. Colletti, Miami, for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ. DANIEL PEARSON, Judge. Eight years after the entry of a judgment dissolving the parties' twenty-nineyear marriage, the former husband, h..

5D08-1311 State v. Burgos (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 14, 2008 Citations: 994 So. 2d 1212

994 So. 2d 1212 (2008) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jadniel BURGOS, Appellee. No. 5D08-1311. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. November 14, 2008. *1213 Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Don Waggoner of Don Waggoner Law, P.A., Kissimmee, for Appellee. TORPY, J. The State appeals the final order granting Appellee's motion to suppress a gun removed from his person during an encounter on ..

07-002239GM CAROL RUNYAN, ELIZABETH HAWKES, HEIDI SUMNER, LANCE AND MARY LUBIN, DENNIS JONES, MARY JONES, JOSEPH BAKER, GREG STANEK, PATRICIA WALTON, MARGUERITE WOOD, DONALD MOSHER, ROBERTA MOSHER, DORTHY BUCKSHORN, HERMAN WELLS, GERI WELLS, EDITH JANE MOORE, ET AL. vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2007)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 18, 2007

The issue in this case is whether Ordinance 679-L of the City of St. Petersburg ("City"), which amended the Future Land Use Map (“FLUM”) of the City's Comprehensive Plan on certain property generally located at the northeast corner of 9th Avenue North and 66th Street North within the boundaries of the City (the "Subject Property") from Institutional to Residential Office Retail (R/O/R) land use on 2.98 acres, Residential Office General (R/OG) on 2.98 acres, and Residential Urban (RU) on 12.02 acres (the “Plan Amendment”), is "in compliance" as defined by Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes,i notwithstanding Petitioners' contentions that the Plan Amendment is internally inconsistent and not based on data and analysis.Petitioners did not prove beyond fair debate that the City future land use map was internally inconsistent or not based on data and analysis.

Charles W. Gerdes

17-3102 Tondrick Jakal Hall v. State of Florida (2018)

Ago (1981)

12-2977 & 12-2457 Kritchman v. Wolk (2014)

5D09-4615 Buggs v. State (2010)

86-1619 Ward v. Ward (1987)

5D08-1311 State v. Burgos (2008)

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.

Search for lawyers by practice areas.