welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Christine Elena Howard
Christine Elena Howard
Christine Elena Howard
Visitors: 46
0
Bar #872229(FL)     License for 34 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Christine Elena Howard? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

19-005141  LATELRA LEWIS vs PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2019
The dispositive issue presented is whether Respondent, Publix Super Markets, Inc. (“Publix” or “Respondent”), is a “public accommodation” as defined by section 760.02(11), and is therefore subject to the terms of the FCRA. Having concluded that the Publix location where the alleged discriminatory action took place is not a “public accommodation” as defined by section 760.02(11), it is unnecessary to determine whether the alleged discriminatory action indeed took place.Petitioner failed to prove, based on the facts in the record, that Respondent's grocery store was a "public accomodation" as defined by section 760.02(11), and was therefore not subject to the FCRA.
17-000018  HASSAN HABIBI vs AUTO CLUB GROUP  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 04, 2017
Whether Petitioner, Hassan Habibi, was subject to an unlawful employment practice by Respondent, Auto Club Group, based on his race, religion, or national origin in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act.Petitioner failed to prove he was subject to an unlawful employment practice by Respondent based on his race, religion, or national origin. Further, Petitioner failed to demonstrate he was constructively discharged from his employment with Respondent.
16-000149  IVY POWELL vs THE AUTO CLUB GROUP  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 13, 2016
Whether Petitioner, Ivy Powell, was subject to an unlawful employment practice by Respondent, The Auto Club Group, based on a disability, in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act.Pet. failed to prove that Resp., her former employer, discriminated against her based on her disability. Pet. did not identify a reasonable accommodation; further, Resp. demonstrated that the accommodation requested would impose undue hardship.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer