welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Christine Fuqua Gay
Christine Fuqua Gay
Christine Fuqua Gay
Visitors: 45
0
Bar #26009(FL)     License for 19 years; Member in Good Standing
Miami FL

Are you Christine Fuqua Gay? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 42 U.S.C 12101, 42 U.S.C 12111, 42 U.S.C 12112

CFR: 29 CFR 1630.2, 29 CFR 1630.2, 29 CFR 1630.2, 49 CFR 3 91.41, 49 CFR 3 91.41, 49 CFR 3 91.41, 49 CFR 391.41, 49 CFR 391.41, 49 CFR 391.41, 49 CFR 391.41, 49 CFR 391.41, 49 CFR 391.41

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 760.01, 760.10, 760.11

07-60836  Ovalles v. Holder  (2009)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: Jul. 27, 2009 Citations: 577 F.3d 288
577 F.3d 288 (2009) Ruben OVALLES, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-60836. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 27, 2009. *290 Deborah S. Griffin, Holland & Knight, Boston, MA, Rachel E. Rosenbloom, Post-Deportation Human Rights & Project Ctr. for Human Rights & Intern. Justice, Newton, MA, Christine Fuqua Gay (argued), Holland & Knight, LLP, Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner. Beth Werlin, Trina Ann Realmuto, Am. Imm. Law Found., Washingt..
5D09-3962  Free v. State  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 04, 2010 Citations: 35 So. 3d 37
35 So. 3d 37 (2010) FREE v. STATE. No. 5D09-3962. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. May 4, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
14-001101  CRAIG JACKSON vs U. P. S.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 14, 2014
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, a package delivery company, unlawfully discriminated against an employee on the basis of his disability in violation of the Florida Civil Rights Act, after Petitioner, a package-car driver for Respondent, became an insulin-dependent diabetic and could not be medically certified as physically qualified to drive a federally-regulated commercial vehicle.Respondent delivery company did not discriminate against an employee on the basis of his disability after Petitioner, a package-car driver for Respondent, became an insulin-dependent diabetic.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer