welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Christopher Dale McGuire
Christopher Dale McGuire
Christopher Dale McGuire
Visitors: 54
0
Bar #622303(FL)     License for 38 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Christopher Dale McGuire? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 0 CFR 258, 40 CFR 258, 40 CFR 258.13, 40 CFR 258.14, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15, 40 CFR 258.15

Florida Laws: 1002.31, 1002.33, 1003.03, 120.52, 120.54, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.68, 258.15, 26.012, 287.001, 287.012, 403.707, 420.504, 420.507, 420.5087, 420.509, 420.5093, 420.5099, 420.907, 420.9072, 627.706

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.217, 62-701.200, 62-701.220, 62-701.320, 62-701.340, 62-701.400, 62-701.410, 67 -60.008, 67-60.008, 67-60.009

20-000140BID  BERKELEY LANDING, LTD., AND BERKELEY LANDING DEVELOPER, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000141BID  BRISAS DEL ESTE APARTMENTS, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000142BID  NORTHSIDE PROPERTY III, LTD vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000143BID  HOMESTEAD 26115, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
20-000145BID  HTG BELLA VISTA, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2020
The issue is whether the actions of Florida Housing concerning the review and scoring of the responses to Request for Applications 2019-102 (“RFA”), titled “Community Development Block Grant--Disaster Recovery (‘CDBG- DR’) to be Used in Conjunction with Tax-Exempt MMRB and Non- Competitive Housing Credits in Counties Deemed Hurricane Recovery Priorities,” were contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Resolution of five consolidated protests involving seven RFA applicants and various issues.
19-002328BID  THE VISTAS AT FOUNTAINHEAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 02, 2019
The issues in this protest are whether Respondent's intended action——i.e., deeming Petitioner's application ineligible for funding on the grounds that the amount of capital the applicant's equity proposal states will be invested during construction is insufficient to cover development costs——is contrary to governing statutes, administrative rules, or the specifications of the solicitation; and, if so, whether this erroneous action is contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, or arbitrary or capricious.Respondent's intended action of deeming an application ineligible due to material ambiguity in the application regarding the amount of equity to be paid prior to construction completion should not be disturbed.
19-002275BID  HTG OAK VALLEY, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
The issues in this protest are whether either or both of Respondent's intended actions in dispute——namely, (i) deeming one application eligible for funding despite the existence of reasonable grounds for uncertainty as to whether the amount of capital the applicant's equity proposal states will be invested during construction is sufficient to cover development costs; and (ii) awarding another applicant a number of proximity points based on information in its application that was later discovered to be mistaken——are contrary to governing statutes, administrative rules, or the specifications of the solicitation; and, if so, whether the erroneous action or actions are contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, or arbitrary or capricious.Intended action deeming an application eligible despite material ambiguity therein regarding the amount of equity available for construction should be set aside; another applicant's proximity points should be reduced to conform to corrected distance data.
19-002276BID  FOUNTAINS AT KINGS POINTE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
The issues in this protest are whether either or both of Respondent's intended actions in dispute——namely, (i) deeming one application eligible for funding despite the existence of reasonable grounds for uncertainty as to whether the amount of capital the applicant's equity proposal states will be invested during construction is sufficient to cover development costs; and (ii) awarding another applicant a number of proximity points based on information in its application that was later discovered to be mistaken——are contrary to governing statutes, administrative rules, or the specifications of the solicitation; and, if so, whether the erroneous action or actions are contrary to competition, clearly erroneous, or arbitrary or capricious.Intended action deeming an application eligible despite material ambiguity therein regarding the amount of equity available for construction should be set aside; another applicant's proximity points should be reduced to conform to corrected distance data.
19-001396BID  DURHAM PLACE, LTD; AND DURHAM PLACE DEVELOPER, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2019
The issue in this bid protest matter is whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s, intended award of funding under Request for Applications 2018-112 was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.Neither Pet'r.(s) proved that Florida Housing's intended award is contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications; further, the existence of a temporary injunction does not inhibit Florida Housing from awarding tax credits.
19-001397BID  AMELIA COURT AT CREATIVE VILLAGE - PHASE II PARTNERS, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2019
The issue in this bid protest matter is whether Respondent, Florida Housing Finance Corporation’s, intended award of funding under Request for Applications 2018-112 was contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications.Neither Pet'r.(s) proved that Florida Housing's intended award is contrary to its governing statutes, rules, or the solicitation specifications; further, the existence of a temporary injunction does not inhibit Florida Housing from awarding tax credits.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer