Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Christopher Torres
Christopher Torres
Visitors: 45
0
Bar #716731(FL)     License for 21 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Christopher Torres? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569120.57120.68163.3177163.3180163.3184163.3220335.141380.06

Florida Administrative Code: 14-57.0129J-2.0459J-5.0059J-5.00559J-5.0169J-5.019

E-3  Miller v. Duke  (1963)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 16, 1963 Citations: 155 So. 2d 627
155 So. 2d 627 (1963) John P. MILLER and Maude B. Miller, his wife, Appellants, v. Paul W. DUKE and James E. Duke, co-partners, d/b/a Duke Lumber & Supply Company, a co-partnership, Appellees. No. E-3. District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District. July 16, 1963. Rehearing Denied August 29, 1963. *628 Scruggs & Carmichael, Gainesville, for appellants. Lowry & Andrews, Gainesville, for appellees. RAWLS, Judge. A construction of the Mechanics' Lien Law is involved in this appeal. [1] The appe..
15-006500  CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 18, 2015
Whether the opening of a public highway-rail grade crossing at the proposed intersection of Tyson Avenue and Bridge Street in Hillsborough County, Florida, meets the criteria set forth in Florida Administrative Code Rule 14-57.012(2)(a)(1-3).Respondent, DOT, demonstrated that the proposed public railroad-highway grade crossing meets the applicable criteria and should therefore be approved.
08-003886  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003887  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003888  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003889  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
07-004598GM  SARASOTA SHOPPINGTOWN LLC vs SARASOTA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 2007
The ultimate issue is whether Sarasota County's comprehensive plan amendments adopted by Ordinance No. 2007-64 (Plan Amendments), as amended by remedial plan amendments adopted by Ordinance No. 2008-33 (Remedial Plan Amendments), are in compliance, as provided by Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes, with respect to: 1) whether the county's designation of several segments of University Parkway as Level of Service (LOS) D for concurrency review, on the basis of a claim that the road is "constrained," is supported by data and analysis; 2) whether the supporting traffic analysis was conducted in a professionally acceptable manner; and 3) whether the identified transportation facilities are financially feasible.Petitioner failed to prove that reducing LOS of a road lacked supporting data and analysis, that traffic data and analysis were inappropriate, and that the remedial plan amendment relied on transportation improvements not financially feasible

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer