Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Clark A Stillwell
Clark A Stillwell
Visitors: 34
0
Bar #202770(FL)     License for 49 years; Member in Good Standing
Inverness FL

Are you Clark A Stillwell? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

92-2918  Campbell v. State  (1993)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 18, 1993 Citations: 614 So. 2d 600
614 So. 2d 600 (1993) Robert CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 92-2918. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. February 18, 1993. *601 Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David P. Gauldin, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee. JOANOS, Chief Judge. Appellant, Robert Campbell, appeals an order imposing restitution as a condition of probation,..
15-002826  GOOD FELLA'S ROLL-OFF WASTE DISPOSAL, INC. vs CITRUS COUNTY, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 20, 2015
Pursuant to section 82-77, Citrus County Code (C.C.C.), Appellant Good Fella’s Roll-Off Waste Disposal, Inc. (Good Fella’s or Appellant), seeks review of the Order on Administrative Hearing (Order) entered by the county administrator of Citrus County on March 27, 2015. Appellant filed its request that the case be referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) for appellate proceedings with both the county administrator and the Citrus County Board of County Commissioners (Board) on April 16, 2015, accompanied by a Notice of Appeal that outlined Appellant’s objections to the Order. The Board voted on May 13, 2015, to refer the case to DOAH. The DOAH case was initiated on May 20, 2015.School Board's home rule powers rendered inapplicable a county ordinance requiring solid waste generated within the county to be disposed of within the county.
10-001136GM  ROBERT A. SCHWEICKERT, JR. vs CITRUS COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 2010
The issues to be determined in this case are whether amendments CPA-09-13 and CPA-09-14 (“Plan Amendments”) to the Citrus County Comprehensive Plan, which were adopted by Ordinance 2009-A24, are “in compliance,” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2009).1/Petitioner failed to prove beyond fair debate that the challenged comprehensive plan amendments are not in compliance.
09-003487GM  RONALD J. FAGAN vs CITRUS COUNTY  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 24, 2009
The issue is whether Citrus County's (County's) small-scale development amendment CPA-09-16 adopted by Ordinance No. 2009- A07 on May 26, 2009, is in compliance. Small-scale amendment not in compliance because of incompatibility with surrounding uses & environmental impacts.
01-004559  IN RE: RULEMAKING TO ESTABLISH THE TUSCANY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT vs *  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 27, 2001
The issue is whether the establishment of the Tuscany Community Development District meets the applicable criteria set forth in Chapter 190, Florida Statutes.Petitioner satisfied all criteria for establishing a community development district in Citrus County.
01-001119  BLACK DIAMOND PROPERTIES, ET AL vs CITRUS COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND THE BROWN SCHOOLS OF FLORIDA, INC.  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 21, 2001
The issues are whether the following decisions of the Director of Development Services of Citrus County on May 9, July 21, and July 25, 2000, are correct: (1) that the Brown School of Florida, Inc.'s proposed use of certain property in Citrus County, Florida, did not constitute a change in use as described in Sections 2021 through 2023 of the Citrus County Land Development Code and is consistent with Rezoning Ordinance No. 86-A38; and (2) that the proposed construction of a fence on the property complied with the Citrus County Land Development Code.Decision by County to allow residential care facility on property zoned for a hospital constituted a departure from essential requirements of law.
01-001120  MARVIN QUEERY vs THE BROWN SCHOOLS OF FLORIDA, INC.  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 21, 2001
The issues are whether the following decisions of the Director of Development Services of Citrus County on May 9, July 21, and July 25, 2000, are correct: (1) that the Brown School of Florida, Inc.'s proposed use of certain property in Citrus County, Florida, did not constitute a change in use as described in Sections 2021 through 2023 of the Citrus County Land Development Code and is consistent with Rezoning Ordinance No. 86-A38; and (2) that the proposed construction of a fence on the property complied with the Citrus County Land Development Code.Decision by County to allow residential care facility on property zoned for a hospital constituted a departure from essential requirements of law.
96-005883  BIG BLUE SPRINGS PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 13, 1996
The issue in these cases is whether Respondent, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, has provided Respondent, Southwest Florida Water Management District, with reasonable assurances that the activities proposed in its Noticed General Environmental Resource Permit No. 4715785.00 meet the conditions established in Section 373.413, Florida Statutes, and Rules 40D-400.215 and 40D-400.485, Florida Administrative Code, for issuance of general environmental resource permits.Department of Environmental Protection proved entitlement to Noticed General Environmental Resource Permit, with condition to restore Big Blue Spring.
99-000147  FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. vs CITRUS COUNTY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 11, 1999
May this appeal be dismissed as moot due to the impossibility of the development order being granted?Motion to dismiss as moot was granted upon evidence that Comprehensive Plan and all maps were in sync before incompleteness determination appeal was complete.
94-001151  BIG BLUE SPRINGS PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. vs BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 02, 1994
Based upon an initial stipulation of the parties, the following narrow issue was presented to the hearing officer upon a motion for a summary finding of fact: Whether the Petitioner was authorized to fill the breach in the dike at the time, in the place, and in the manner it was filled? Based the hearing officer's finding to the issue presented above, the parties entered into a further stipulation which resolved the existing conflict between the parties.Pet who rec'd authorization from DNR, DEP & Corp of Engineers, had authority to repair dike in the place, at the time & in the manner it was repaired.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer