welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Craig Deron Varn
Craig Deron Varn
Craig Deron Varn
Visitors: 163
0
Bar #90247(FL)     License for 29 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Craig Deron Varn? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

10-002984  THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY vs BAY COUNTY AND NORTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 28, 2010
Whether Bay County has demonstrated its entitlement to the Permit?Bay County's prima facie case for entitlement to permit for a wellfield near Sand Hill Lakes Area was rebutted by Washington County and the Knight Foundation. Denial of permit recommended.
07-004843DRI  BONITA BAY PROPERTIES, INC., AND SWF PROPERTIES OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, LTD. vs CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 23, 2007
The issue is whether the proposed change to the Bonita Bay Development of Regional Impact to allow residential development within 330 feet of an active bald eagle's nest in an area that had been set aside for preservation should be approved. Proposed change to DRI to allow residential development within 330 feet of eagle`s nest is not a substantial deviation, not likely to adversely impact the eagle, and is consistent with the local comprehensive plan. The proposed change should be approved.
03-000052GM  ROBERT ALESSI, RONALD CAPRON, CHAD HANSON, VICTOR LAMBOU, AND DAVID WESTMARK vs WAKULLA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 2003
Whether the amendment to the Wakulla County Comprehensive Plan adopted by the Board of Commissioners of Wakulla County in Ordinance No. 2002-28 is "in compliance" as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes?Amendment to Wakulla County`s Comprehensive Plan Ordinance is not in compliance because it was based on incorrect data related to the size contiguous to the wetland.
01-003535  CYNTHIA VALENCIC vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND SARASOTA COUNTY  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 06, 2001
The issue is whether Sarasota County's application for a permit authorizing the construction of a Class V, Group 3 aquifer storage and recovery well system at the Central County Water Reclamation Facility in Sarasota, Florida, should be approved.Operational concerns of a Class V injection well should not be considered in an application for a contruction permit. These concerns are addressed in the application for operating permits. Permit is approved.
02-002940  PHILLIP BUCHNER vs MARK GRONLUND AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2002
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), should grant the application of Respondent, Mark Gronlund, to modify his Standard General Environmental Resource Permit for water ski jump and slalom courses on Lake Blanchester in Lake County, Florida, to increase the size of the jump course and combine it with a new slalom course, so that buoys are shared by the two courses, and to add gate alignment buoys to the existing slalom course.Applicant to modify water ski jump and slalom courses in general standard permit gave the necessary reasonable assurance, subject to a condition for personal use only.
02-002941  STAN KRUPSKI AND JACK K. AUSTIN vs MARK GRONLUND AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2002
The issue in this case is whether Respondent, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), should grant the application of Respondent, Mark Gronlund, to modify his Standard General Environmental Resource Permit for water ski jump and slalom courses on Lake Blanchester in Lake County, Florida, to increase the size of the jump course and combine it with a new slalom course, so that buoys are shared by the two courses, and to add gate alignment buoys to the existing slalom course.Applicant to modify water ski jump and slalom courses in general standard permit gave the necessary reasonable assurance, subject to a condition for personal use only.
01-001080  MANASOTA-88, INC. vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.
01-001081  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.
01-001082  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC-PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2001
Petitioners and Intervenors challenge the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) Notice of Intent to Issue Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) No. 0142476-003 to IMC Phosphates Company (IMC) for proposed mining of phosphate at the Manson Jenkins Property (Property) located in Manatee County, Florida. The ultimate issue is whether IMC has provided reasonable assurance that the applicable requirements of Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, and relevant rules promulgated thereunder, have been satisfied justifying entitlement to an ERP.IMC provided reasonable assurances that its proposed phosphate mining, reclamation, and associated activities on the Manson Jenkins Property in Manasota County would not violate applicable statutes and rules and is not contrary to the public interest.
01-002910  JOHN RONDOLINO vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 23, 2001
The issues in this case are: (1) whether Respondent, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) should grant the applications of Petitioner, John Rondolino, for an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) and a Sovereign Lands Consent of Use for a proposed single-family dock on his property on the Rainbow River in near Dunnellon in Marion County, Florida; and (2) whether the landward extent of DEP's wetlands jurisdiction on Petitioner's property should be determined in this proceeding and, if so, the landward extent of those jurisdictional wetlands.Multi-faceted Environmental Resource Permit application was denied although all but dock application withdrawn. Denial addressed wetlands delineation, but Department had no jurisdiction once dredge and fill on wetlands withdrawn. Dock application denied.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer