DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs WILLIAM W. ADAMS, M.D.
COOPERATIVE DE SEGUROS MULTIPLES DE PUERTO RICO, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs TOURIGNY CUSTOM WOOD WORKS
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE AND INTERIOR DESIGN vs ROBERT WAYNE HERMANN
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs OSCAR S. BENITEZ AND O. BENITEZ & ASSOCIATES, INC.
The issue is whether Respondent properly determined that Petitioner did not pass the February 2003 Restricted Barber Practical Examination.Respondent properly determined that Petitioner did not pass the Restricted Barber Practical Examination.
LOS SUENOS, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs CITY OF NAPLES
LOU BACHRODT CHEVROLET, INC. vs GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs MONROE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs MICHAEL D. VICK
The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of transacting insurance business in violation of Sections 626.611 and 626.621, Florida Statutes, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Recommended Respondent pay a $1,250 fine for two address violations and receive a six-month suspension for failure to designate a primary insurance agent.
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs DANIEL P. ZUTLER
Respondent did not commit an unlawful employment action by discriminating against Petitioner based on her age or handicap. Respondent discharged Petitioner due to her disruptive conduct in the work place. Recommend Petition be dismissed.
JANET HORTON vs EASTSIDE VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
The issue is whether Respondent engaged in prohibited discriminatory conduct against Petitioners, Irene Cassermere (Ms. Cassermere) and Milagross Diaz (Ms. Diaz), within the terms and conditions, privileges, or provisions of services or facilities in the sale or rental of real property in violation of Section 760.23, Florida Statutes (2002).Petitioner alleged discrimination based on color and national origin. Petitioner failed to establish prima facie case. Petition denied.
Whether Respondent discriminated against Petitioner, Patricia McDonough, on the basis of her race, violating Subsections 760.23(1), (2), or (4), Florida Statutes (2002). If discriminatory conduct has been proven, whether quantifiable damages, or other allowable remedies, have been proven under Section 760.35(3)(b), Florida Statutes (2002).Petitioner failed to prove a prima facie case of race discrimination in housing. Petitioner failed to prove that upon her relocation to Florida, that she...
Whether Petitioner's Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice (Petition for Relief) filed against Respondents should be granted by the Florida Commission on Human Relations (Commission).Petitioner failed to meet her burden of proving that she was a victim of housing discrimination based on handicap and familial status.
PATRICIA DOHNANSKY vs FOX HOLLOW APARTMENTS, EMILY BADGER, KEN DIXON, AND LELAND ENTERPRISES
Whether Respondents committed discriminatory housing practices against Petitioner as alleged in the Petition for Relief filed by Petitioner.2Petitioner failed to prove housing discrimination.
