welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Cynthia Johnson-Stacks
Cynthia Johnson-Stacks
Cynthia Johnson-Stacks
Visitors: 55
0
Bar #372234(FL)     License for 42 years
Miami FL

Are you Cynthia Johnson-Stacks? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 838.16, 985.686

1D03-2188  Folds v. JA Jones Const. Co.  (2004)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2004 Citations: 875 So. 2d 700
875 So. 2d 700 (2004) Teresa FOLDS, Appellant, v. J.A. JONES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY f/k/a Metric Constructors, Inc., Tampa Service Company, Inc. d/b/a Pacesetters Personnel Service, and John Doe, Appellees. No. 1D03-2188. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 3, 2004. *701 Christopher M. Vlachos and Troy A. Rafferty of Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Echsner & Proctor, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant. Joseph A. Wilson of Wilson, Harrell, Smith, Boles & Farrington, P.A., Pens..
5D08-3383  Estate of Smith v. SOUTHLAND SUITES  (2010)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 08, 2010 Citations: 28 So. 3d 103
28 So. 3d 103 (2010) ESTATE OF Ellen Lucille SMITH, etc., Appellant, v. SOUTHLAND SUITES OF ORMOND BEACH, LLC., et al., Appellee. No. 5D08-3383. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 8, 2010. Rehearing Denied February 24, 2010. Susan B. Morrison of Law Offices of Susan B. Morrison, P.A., and Isaac R. Ruiz-Carus of Wilkes & McHugh, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Thomas A. Valdez of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The Estate of Ellen Smit..
12-000891RX  OKALOOSA COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 12, 2012
This is a rule challenge brought pursuant to section 120.56, Florida Statutes,1/ to existing Florida Administrative Code rules 63G-1.011, 63G-1.013, 63G-1.016, and 63G-1.017, (the "Challenged Rules"), adopted by the Department of Juvenile Justice (Department). At issue is whether some or all of the challenged rules constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined by section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes. The challengers allege the rules are invalid on three grounds: The rules modify the dividing line between county and state responsibility for the costs of secure juvenile detention from "final court disposition" to "commitment"; The rules fail to implement the requirement that the counties are only responsible for the "actual costs" of secure juvenile detention for the period of time prior to final court disposition; The rules inappropriately utilize an appropriations bill to modify the amount Petitioners are required to pay for predisposition costs under section 985.686, Florida Statutes.Department of Juvenile Justice's rules governing cost sharing between state and counties for secure juvenile detention are invalid.
10-001893  MIAMI-DADE COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001894  SANTA ROSA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001895  ALACHUA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001896  ORANGE COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 12, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-001945  PINELLAS COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 13, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-002194  ESCAMBIA COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.
10-002195  HERNANDO COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 22, 2010
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether the Department of Juvenile Justice (the "Department") assessed Petitioners and Intervenor counties for secure juvenile detention care for fiscal year 2008-2009 in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 985.686, Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rules 63G-1.001 through 63G-1.009.1/Department of Juvenile Justice improperly calculated counties' contributions to Shared County/State Juvenile Detention Trust Fund for fiscal year 2008-2009.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer