welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. D. Kent Safriet
D. Kent Safriet
D. Kent Safriet
Visitors: 112
0
Bar #174939(FL)     License for 26 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you D. Kent Safriet? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.53, 120.536, 120.54, 120.542, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 161.011, 161.041, 161.053, 161.055, 161.088, 161.091, 161.131, 161.141, 161.161, 161.191, 161.201, 161.211, 161.212, 253.001, 253.002, 253.03, 253.04, 253.141, 253.68, 253.72, 253.73, 253.74, 253.75, 253.77, 258.004, 258.007, 267.061, 373.414, 379.2431, 403.201, 403.412, 550.0251, 550.2415, 92.16

Florida Administrative Code: 18-14.003, 18-21.003, 18-21.004, 18-21.005, 18-21.0051, 28-106.205, 61D-6.002, 62-110.106, 62-4.242, 62-4.244, 62B-36.002, 62B-41.002, 62B-41.005, 62B-41.007, 62B-41.008, 62B-49.002, 62B-49.003, 62B-49.005, 62B-49.013, 62D-2.014

89-2982  Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Elbert  (1991)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 27, 1991 Citations: 590 So. 2d 15
590 So. 2d 15 (1991) WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., Appellant, v. Patricia ELBERT a/k/a, Patricia Bryant, Appellee. No. 89-2982. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. November 27, 1991. Richard N. Blank of Richard N. Blank, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. No appearance for appellee. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from the trial court's denial of a motion for attorney's fees. The facts of the case are simple and straightforward. Plaintiff sued defendant as a result of an alleged sli..
05-002034  COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002035  MARINE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002036  DOUGLAS FINLAY vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
05-002037  ERIC ALEXANDER, JACK HAIL, DAVE SIRKOS, JAMES PERGOLA AND ALLEN WALBURN vs FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND CITY OF NAPLES  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 2005
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the City of Naples's (City) Waterway Marker Permit Application should be granted, given the requirements of Section 327.40, Florida Statutes (2005) and Florida Administrative Code Rule 68-23.105(1)(b)(3) through (6).Respondent City of Naples failed to show that delineating new slow boat speed zones with a waterway marking permit was needed for vessel traffic congestion, significant risk of collision or threat to public safety. Recommend that the permit be denied.
10-002468  DAVID H. SHERRY, REBECCA R. SHERRY, AND JOHN S. DONOVAN vs OKALOOSA COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 10, 2010
Whether the Petitioners have standing to initiate this proceeding? Whether the Intervenors have standing to intervene? Whether the Department should enter a final order that issues the JCP and the Variance?Okaloosa County and DEP provided reasonable assurance that beach restoration permit for Okaloosa Island Project meets statutory and rule criteria except for compliance with "beach compatible" fill under DEP's "Sand Rule."
10-005348RU  ROLAND GUIDRY, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE GUIDRY LIVING TRUST, AND OCEANIA OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 13, 2010
All Three Cases Whether the Petitioners have standing to bring their respective challenges pursuant to Section 120.56(4), Florida Statutes? Case No. 10-5348RU Whether either or both Original Specific Condition 1 and the Department ECL Position constitute a rule? Case Nos. 10-6205 and 10-8197 Whether Specific Condition 5 constitutes a rule? Attorney's Fees Whether an order should be entered against the Department for costs and attorney's fees under Section 120.595(4), Florida Statutes?Petitioners did not prove standing to challenge as unadopted rules two conditions in a beach restoration permit and a position of DEP with regard to when erosion control lines must be established.
10-006205RU  DAVID H. SHERRY, REBECCA R. SHERRY, AND JOHN S. DONOVAN vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 26, 2010
All Three Cases Whether the Petitioners have standing to bring their respective challenges pursuant to Section 120.56(4), Florida Statutes? Case No. 10-5348RU Whether either or both Original Specific Condition 1 and the Department ECL Position constitute a rule? Case Nos. 10-6205 and 10-8197 Whether Specific Condition 5 constitutes a rule? Attorney's Fees Whether an order should be entered against the Department for costs and attorney's fees under Section 120.595(4), Florida Statutes?Petitioners did not prove standing to challenge as unadopted rules two conditions in a beach restoration permit and a position of DEP with regard to when erosion control lines must be established.
10-008197RU  MACLA LTD, II, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; H. JOSEPH HUGHES, AS TRUSTEE OF THE BETTY PRICE HUGHES QUALIFIED VACATION RESIDENCE TRUST; AND KERSHAW MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 23, 2010
All Three Cases Whether the Petitioners have standing to bring their respective challenges pursuant to Section 120.56(4), Florida Statutes? Case No. 10-5348RU Whether either or both Original Specific Condition 1 and the Department ECL Position constitute a rule? Case Nos. 10-6205 and 10-8197 Whether Specific Condition 5 constitutes a rule? Attorney's Fees Whether an order should be entered against the Department for costs and attorney's fees under Section 120.595(4), Florida Statutes?Petitioners did not prove standing to challenge as unadopted rules two conditions in a beach restoration permit and a position of DEP with regard to when erosion control lines must be established.
10-000515  DAVID H. SHERRY, REBECCA R. SHERRY, AND JOHN S. DONOVAN vs OKALOOSA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 02, 2010
Whether the Sherry Petitioners have standing to initiate the proceeding in Case No. 10-0515? Whether the Oceania Petitioners have standing to initiate the proceeding in Case No. 10-0516? Whether the MACLA Intervenors have standing to intervene? Whether the Department should enter a final order that issues the JCP, the Variance and the SSL Authorization?Department of Environmental Protection should issue Joint Coastal Permit, Variance and Sovereign Submerged Lands Authorization to Okaloosa County for the Western Destin Beach restoration project.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer