Leon FL Administrative law and Arbitration Lawyers | Dana Vi -- eLawyers

04-000281 ALBERT T. ESCUETA vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 2004

The issue presented is whether Petitioner's application for licensure should be approved.Recommend denial of application for licensure where applicant intentionally failed to disclose his prior plea of guilty to a felony.

03-002713PL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs STEVE ARLEO (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2003

Whether Respondent's insurance license should be suspended or revoked because Respondent failed to disclose his criminal history on his insurance license application.Petitioner failed to reveal pleas of nolo contendre on his insurance agent application. Recommended that his license be revoked.

93-000604RU ANDREW MACHATA vs DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 1993

The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Florida Administrative Code Rules 16B-33.005(1), 16B- 33.005(3)(c), 16B-33.005(3)(g), 16B-33.005(7), 16B-33.007(7), 1/ and certain agency statements interpreting those rules are an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority within the meaning of Section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes. 2/Clearly justified necessity for permit. Written and unwritten rules are in- valid because they do not establish standards and are arbitrary & capricious

95-004045 MICHAEL WALTHER AND ADELE CLEMENS vs INDIAN RIVER COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 15, 1995

The central issue in this case is whether the Department of Environmental Protection (Department) should approve a permit for the applicant, Indian River County (County), to install a prefabricated erosion prevention reef (PEP reef) off the coast of Vero Beach, Florida.County entitled to experimental permit as met all criteria at issue; Petitioners failed to establish they will be adversely impacted by project.

95-003747 GEORGE E. AND MIRIAM R. YOUNG vs NORTH AMERICAN CONSOLIDATED CORPORATION AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1995)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 1995

The issue in this case is whether North Armenia Consolidated Corporation is entitled to a coastal construction control line permit to build a single-family home seaward of the coastal construction control line on Little Gasparilla Island.No Coastal Construction Control Line permit where part of proposed single-family dwelling is seaward of 30-year erosion control line and is on frontal dune. Manmade dune insufficient.

90-008074 ANDREW MACHATA vs DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 21, 1990

The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether Respondent should issue a permit for coastal armoring to protect Petitioners' homes.Pet. clearly justified necessity for permit. Written & unwritten rules are invalid bec they do not adeq establ. standards & are arbitrary & capricious.

91-005417 AMERICAN COASTAL ENGINEERING, INC., ON BEHALF OF WILLIS H. DUPONT vs DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 1991

The issues for determination at final hearing were (1) whether Petitioner's coastal construction Permit No. 86-155PB, authorizing Petitioner to construct and temporarily maintain an experimental reef structure seaward of the DuPont residence in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, should be extended under Special Permit Condition 10 of the Permit and (2) whether the experimental reef structure should be removed pursuant to Special Permit Conditions 3 and 12 of the Permit.Petitioner failed to establish that its coastal construction permit should be extended by failing to show that special permit conditions were satisfied

94-005826 REGENCY TOWERS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DESTIN ARCHITECTURAL AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 1994

The issue is whether Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection ("DEP"), should grant the applicant, Pelican Resort Developments, Inc., a coastal construction control line ("CCCL") permit. The applicant seeks to construct a condominium project in Destin, Florida. Portions of the project are seaward of the CCCL for Okaloosa County.Application for coastal construction control line permit meets all requirements and should be granted.

93-004560 CAROLE POPE vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1993)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 17, 1993

Whether the Petitioners, and each of them, have standing to bring the instant action before the Division of Administrative Hearings. Whether the 5500 North Corporation has meets the requirements set forth in Section 161.053, Florida Statutes, and Rule 16B-33, Florida Administrative Code, for obtaining a permit to construct a structure seaward to the coastal construction control line (CCCL).Petitioner has shown necessity for CCCL permit; dune & turtle impacts minim- al; local government approval valid; one petitioner failed to show standing.

91-000471 LEMON BAY CONSERVANCY, INC. vs CHARLOTTE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 22, 1991

The issue for consideration in this case is whether Charlotte County should be issued a permit to dredge Stump Pass and Deposit the spoil therefrom on the beach south of the pass.Applicant for dredging permit shows adequate protection of shoreline and safety of turtle population to support granting of permit to dredge pass.

Dana Virginia Wiehle