Leon FL Administrative law, Financial markets and services a -- eLawyers

11-15053 Non-Argument Calendar Friends of Everglades v. South Fla. Water Mgmt. (2012)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Apr. 30, 2012 Citations: 678 F.3d 1199

678 F.3d 1199 (2012) FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES, et al., Plaintiffs-Counter Defendants, Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, a Florida municipality, Intervenor Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant, v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee, Henry Dean, Executive Director, Defendant, United States of America, U.S. Sugar Corporation, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellees. No. 11-15053 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April ..

07-13829 FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES v. South Florida Water Management District (2010)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: May 07, 2010 Citations: 605 F.3d 962

605 F.3d 962 (2010) FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES, Florida Wildlife Federation, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants, Fishermen Against Destruction of the Environment, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant Appellee, Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Appellee, Carol Wehle, Executive Director, Defendant-Appellant, United States of America, U.S. Su..

07-13829 FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES v. South Florida Water Management District (2009)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Jun. 04, 2009 Citations: 605 F.3d 962

570 F.3d 1210 (2009) FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES, Florida Wildlife Federation, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants, Fishermen Against Destruction of the Environment, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Cross-Appellee, Carol Wehle, Executive Director, Defendant-Appellant, United States of America, U.S. S..

2D07-4758 Byrne v. Byrne (2007)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 20, 2007 Citations: 968 So. 2d 564

968 So. 2d 564 (2007) BYRNE v. BYRNE. No. 2D07-4758. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. November 20, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Proh. dismissed.

SC02-1878 NAACP, INC. v. Florida Bd. of Regents (2003)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 2003 Citations: 863 So. 2d 294

863 So. 2d 294 (2003) NAACP, INC., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. FLORIDA BOARD OF REGENTS, et al., Respondents. No. SC02-1878. Supreme Court of Florida. November 13, 2003. Daniel H. Thompson of Berger Singerman, Tallahassee, FL; and Mitchell W. Berger of Berger Singerman, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Petitioners. Daniel Woodring, Office of the General Counsel, Florida Dept. of Educ., Tallahassee, FL, for Respondents. *295 Arthur J. England and Elliot B. Kula of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, FL; and..

83-2692 Koenig v. State (1986)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 02, 1986 Citations: 497 So. 2d 875

497 So. 2d 875 (1986) Robert KOENIG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 83-2692. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. January 28, 1986. On Rehearing December 2, 1986. *876 Gelber, Glass & Durant and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Miami, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Anthony C. Musto, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ. DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge. Although we agree with the defendant that, absent a dete..

3D08-1796 Hirsch v. Steiner (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 16, 2008 Citations: 989 So. 2d 1195

989 So. 2d 1195 (2008) HIRSCH v. STEINER. No. 3D08-1796. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. September 16, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Vol.dismissed.

94-1319 State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Novotny (1995)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 23, 1995 Citations: 657 So. 2d 1210

657 So. 2d 1210 (1995) STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Ellen NOVOTNY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 94-1319. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. June 23, 1995. Rehearing Denied August 4, 1995. *1211 Allen J. McKenna, Garwood, McKenna & McKenna, P.A., Orlando, for appellant/cross-appellee. Charles R. Steinberg, Charles R. Steinberg, P.A., Orlando, for appellee/cross-appellant. W. SHARP, Judge. State Farm appeals from a final judgment which ..

15-004303 WAL-MART, INC., AND SEDGWICK CMS vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2015

The following are the issues presented: Whether the Division of Administrative Hearings (“DOAH”) has jurisdiction to determine the claim of Petitioners Wal-Mart, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”) and Sedgwick CMS (“Sedgwick”) to relief under section 440.13(8) and (11), Florida Statutes; If DOAH has jurisdiction, whether Petitioners have standing to raise the issue of medical overutilization; If DOAH has jurisdiction and the Petitioners have standing, whether Petitioners are estopped from seeking reimbursement of any monies paid to Intervenors Florida Institute for Neurologic Rehabilitation (“FINR”) and Fruitville Holdings - Oppidan, Inc. (“Oppidan”); If DOAH has jurisdiction and Petitioners have standing and are not estopped, whether Intervenors engaged in overutilization of medical care in their care and treatment of the injured worker, D.F.; Whether Respondent, Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers’ Compensation (the “Department), has the authority to order Intervenors to reimburse Petitioners for payments related to overutilization by Intervenors in the medical care of D.F.; and If the Department has such authority, how much money should Intervenors be ordered to reimburse Petitioners.Carrier failed to establish standing to seek administrative remedy for payments to health care provider alleged to constitute overutilization.

14-001641BID CATAPULT LEARNING, LLC vs ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 11, 2014

The issue in this case, a bid protest, is whether Respondent, Orange County School Board (the School Board), acted contrary to its governing statutes, rules or policies when it awarded the alternative education drop-out prevention services request for proposal number 1401017 (the RFP) to Ombudsman Educational Services, LTD. (Ombudsman) instead of Catapult Learning, LLC (Catapult).Petitioner failed to show that the OCSB's action was contrary to its governing rules, policies or solicition specification or that the OCSB actions were clearly erroneous contrary to competition or capricious.

Daniel H Thompson