Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
David Andrew Schlesinger
David Andrew Schlesinger
Visitors: 16
0
San Diego CA

Are you David Andrew Schlesinger? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

95-005314  STEVE J. LONGARIELLO vs COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 1995
Whether the Respondent's motion to dismiss should be granted.No preliminary review on marital status which barred since not timely filed plus pending federal lawsuit.
95-005320  STEVE J. LONGARIELLO vs DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 1995
Whether the Department of Education (Department), through its Office of Teacher Recruitment and Retention, committed an unlawful employment practice in violation of Section 760.10(2), Florida Statutes, as alleged by Petitioner, by failing or refusing to refer Petitioner for employment because of his sex (male) and/or marital status (single)? If so, what affirmative relief should Petitioner be provided?Teacher who alleged that he was not referred for employment because he was a single male failed to prove referrals not made; no sanctions imposed.
95-005318  STEVE J. LONGARIELLO vs LEARNING CENTERS, INC., D/B/A LIGHTHOUSE POINT ACADEMY  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 1995
On or about July 12, 1993, Petitioner filed a complaint, including attachments, with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) alleging that Respondent discriminated against him on the basis of sex and marital status in violation of the Florida Human Rights Act. On August 9, 1993, Petitioner filed a complaint with the U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging that Respondent discriminated against him on the basis of sex and marital status in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (Title VII). By Letter of Determination dated May 23, 1995, the EEOC notified Petitioner that it had investigated his claim, and that it had determined that Respondent had not considered his sex (male) or marital status (single) in reaching its decision not to hire him and no violation of Title VII had occurred, and that it was, therefore, dismissing Petitioner's complaint. Further, the EEOC notified Petitioner that he may only pursue the matter by filing suit in federal district court within 90 days. On August 14, 1995, Petitioner filed suit against Respondent in federal district court alleging discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII.Discrimination based on sex decided by federal court/no prima facie showing of discrimination based on marital status/dismissal.
95-005316  STEVE J. LONGARIELLO vs DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 1995
The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent discriminated against the Petitioner as alleged in an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) complaint filed in August, 1993.Petitioner not hired because application incomplete no basis for discrimination claim.
95-005317  STEVE J. LONGARIELLO vs MONROE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 1995
Whether Respondent discriminated against Petitioner on the basis of marital status or sex.Petitioner filed a suit in Federal Court on sexual discrimination, which means Federal Court has exclusive jurisdiction. There was no evidence to show the school knew of Petitioner's marital status.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer