Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
David Lee McGee
David Lee McGee
Visitors: 37
0
Bar #220000(FL)     License for 48 years; Member in Good Standing
Pensacola FL

Are you David Lee McGee? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

99-16940-8W7  In Re LeBeau  (2000)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Apr. 18, 2000 Citations: 247 B.R. 537
247 B.R. 537 (2000) In re Richard LEBEAU, Theresa LeBeau, Debtors. No. 99-16940-8W7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 18, 2000. *538 Andrea Whitehill, Venice, FL, for debtors. Ralph Jay Harpley, Tampa, FL, Chapter 7 Trustee. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge. This case came before the court at a hearing ("Hearing") to determine whether a reaffirmation agreement ("Agreement") executed by the debtors, Richard and Theresa LeBeau ..
Bankruptcy No. 80-889  Matter of Vincent  (1980)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 1980 Citations: 7 B.R. 866
7 B.R. 866 (1980) In the Matter of Frank A. VINCENT and Kitty A. Vincent, his wife, Debtors. ST. PETERSBURG FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. Frank A. VINCENT and Kitty A. Vincent, his wife, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 80-889. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. December 29, 1980. *867 Wm. Fletcher Belcher, St. Petersburg, Fla., for St. Petersburg Federal Sav. David W. Steen, Tampa, Fla., for debtor. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON COMPLAINT T..
99-9694-9P7  In Re Lee  (2000)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2000 Citations: 247 B.R. 311
247 B.R. 311 (2000) In re James LEE, Debtor. No. 99-9694-9P7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Ft. Myers Division. January 14, 2000. *312 Richard J. Hollander, Naples, FL, for debtor. William Seach and Crossroads Real Estate, Inc., Thomas S. Heidkamp, Fort Myers, FL, creditors. Anthony S. DiVincenzo, Philip L. Burnett, Fort Myers, FL, creditor. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS IS a hotly contested involuntary Chap..
96-2465-3P3  In Re Stewart  (2000)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2000 Citations: 247 B.R. 515
247 B.R. 515 (2000) In re: Eunice Elizabeth STEWART, Debtor. No. 96-2465-3P3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. March 15, 2000. *516 *517 Grace E. Robson, Miami, FL, for EMC Mortgage Corporation. David J. Pinkston, Jacksonville, FL, for Eunice Elizabeth Stewart. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Chief Judge. This case came before the Court upon EMC Mortgage Corporation's ("EMC") Motion for Relief from Order Confirming Chapter 13 Plan and..
Bankruptcy No. 99-9950-8P7. Adversary No. 99-570  In Re Vinecki  (2000)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Mar. 28, 2000 Citations: 247 B.R. 327
247 B.R. 327 (2000) In re Theodore and Margaret VINECKI, Debtors. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v. Theodore and Margaret Vinecki, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 99-9950-8P7. Adversary No. 99-570. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 28, 2000. *328 Gary A. Carnal, St. Petersburg, FL, for Defendants. Arthur S. Weitzner, Sarasota, FL, for Plaintiff. ORDER ON ORAL ARGUMENT ON AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES, INTEREST AND COSTS ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Bank..
08-004753GM  BELLE MER OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs SANTA ROSA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 23, 2008
The issues in this proceeding are whether Santa Rosa County Comprehensive Plan Amendment 2007-R-047 adopted by Ordinance No. 2008-16, section 2, attachment A, on May 22, 2008 (Plan Amendment), is "in compliance," as that term is defined by Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes, and, more specifically, whether the Plan Amendment is "internally consistent" with Objectives 7.1.B and 7.1.F and Policy 7.1.F.8 of the Santa Rosa County Comprehensive Plan (Plan) and supported by adequate data and analyses.1The challenger to a comprehensive plan amendment did not prove beyond fair debate that the amendment was not "in compliance."

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer