Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
David Paul Horan
David Paul Horan
Visitors: 126
0
Bar #142474(FL)     License for 53 years
Key West FL

Are you David Paul Horan? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

95-004377  CAHILL PINES AND PALMS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 31, 1995
Whether Petitioner's application for a permit to remove portions of two canal plugs in the Cahill Canal system should be denied on the basis of res judicata.Permit application denied on basis of res judicata.
88-003451  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs. JAMES D. YOUNG AND OLIVIA A. YOUNG  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Apr. 13, 1995
The issue presented is whether the land clearing permits issued to Respondents Young by Respondent Monroe County comport with the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes.Applications for land clearing permit/development orders denied where applicant refused to offer evidence in support of their applications
93-005916  CAHILL PINES AND PALMS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 1993
Whether Petitioner should be granted the permit it has requested from the Department of Environmental Protection authorizing it to remove two plugs in the canal system that runs through the Cahill Pines and Palms subdivision in Monroe County, Florida, and if so, under what conditions, if any?Removal of plugs from canal system in Keys not permittable where reasonable assurance not given re: water quality standards and that project in public intrst
87-004067  VINCENT M. DROST vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1987)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 27, 1988
At issue in these proceedings is whether petitioner's application to construct vertical bulkheads and patios on top of existing caprock within the manmade canals of Cudjoe Gardens, Monroe County, Florida, should be approved. At hearing, petitioner testified on his own behalf, and called Edward McCullough as a witness. Petitioner's exhibits 1- 16 were received into evidence, however, the probative value of exhibit 11, a document subject to the hearsay objection, was limited to supplementing or explaining competent proof. Respondent called as witnesses: Deborah Holle, accepted as an expert in wildlife management; Lucie Ann Blair, accepted as an expert in assessing biological impacts of dredge and fill projects; George P. Bartona, accepted as an expert in coastal engineering, hydrographics, water transport systems, and aerial photo interpretation; and Janet Llewellyn, accepted as an expert in assessing biological impacts of dredge and fill projects, oceanography, and the interpretation of the Department of Environmental Regulation's rules and statutes. Respondent's exhibits 1-7 were received into evidence. The transcript of hearing was not ordered. The parties' proposed findings of fact have been addressed in appendix 1 to this recommended order.Lands found not to be exempt from permittting for seawalls where not abut- ting artificial waterway or one occupied in whole or in part by the seawalls
84-002897  RAYMOND AND IRENE MACKAY vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1984)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jul. 26, 1985
Whether petitioners' application for a permit to place fill in waters of the state, in an area known as the Key West Salt Ponds, should be granted or denied on grounds that the filling activity would result in violations of water quality standards contained in Chapters 17-3 and 17-4, Florida Administrative Code, and Chapter 403, Florida Statutes; Whether, assuming the propriety of the permit denial and its validity as an exercise of the state's police power under Chapter 403, Florida Statutes, Petitioners are entitled to relief on a claim that the denial constitutes a "taking" in violation of the United States and Florida Constitutions;Fill permit for Key West Salt Ponds denied. It would seriously degrade water quality. Circuit court is fact-finder on denial-as-taking issue, not Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH).
80-001172  JAMES M. BROWN vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1980)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Oct. 12, 1981
Deny after-the-fact permit for dredge/fill in waters of state. Reasonable assurances were not given and harm to environment resulted. Restore area.
79-001247  SUNSET ACRES MOBILE HOME SALES vs. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1979)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 28, 1980
At issue herein is whether or not the Respondent, Department of Environmental Regulation's notice of its intended denial of petitioner's permit application which requested an excavation through an existing perimeter dyke, was proper.Petitioner's application should be granted for giving reasonable assurances the project will not interfere with marine and wildlife conservation.
78-001234  DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION vs. JAMES BROWN, D/B/A RAMROD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY  (1978)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Sep. 19, 1979
Respondent put fill on roadway that bisected wetland/mangrove area. Respondent owes department costs and must submit restoration plan/apply for permit in twenty days of Final Order.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer