welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. David Stockton Hendrix
David Stockton Hendrix
David Stockton Hendrix
Visitors: 277
0
Bar #827053(FL)     License for 36 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you David Stockton Hendrix? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Bankruptcy No. 88-1119-8P7, Adversary No. 96-1001  In Re MacAgnone  (1998)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Jul. 14, 1998 Citations: 224 B.R. 212
224 B.R. 212 (1998) In re Frank P. MACAGNONE and Santina Macagnone, Debtors. Frank P. MACAGNONE and Santina Macagnone, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 88-1119-8P7, Adversary No. 96-1001. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. July 14, 1998. *213 Nicholas Bangos, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiffs. Philip Doyle, Washington, DC, for Defendants. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER L. PASKAY..
10-11912  Krinsk v. SunTrust Banks, Inc.  (2011)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Sep. 07, 2011
654 F.3d 1194 (2011) Sara E. KRINSK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., et al., Defendants, SunTrust Bank, a Georgia Banking Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-11912. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 7, 2011. *1196 Mark L. Knutson, Jeffrey R. Krinsk, Finkelstein & Krinsk, LLP, San Diego, CA, James A. Wardell, Wardell & Quezon, PA, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee. David Stockton Hendrix, Gray Robin..
07-001055BID  IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. vs PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2007
Whether Respondent acted contrary to the agency's governing statutes, rules or policies, or the bid specifications in its proposed decision to award a contract to Intervenor Xerox Corporation pursuant to Request for Proposal ("RFP") No. 07-015- 040-RFP.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the Agency`s misapplication of its duly-adopted rule constituted a new, unpromulgated rule.
07-001266RU  IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. vs PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 19, 2007
Whether Respondent acted contrary to the agency's governing statutes, rules or policies, or the bid specifications in its proposed decision to award a contract to Intervenor Xerox Corporation pursuant to Request for Proposal ("RFP") No. 07-015- 040-RFP.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the Agency`s misapplication of its duly-adopted rule constituted a new, unpromulgated rule.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer