Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Diane Kay Kiesling
Diane Kay Kiesling
Visitors: 79
0
Bar #233285(FL)     License for 47 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Diane Kay Kiesling? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

09-005341PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ISABELLA K. SHARPE, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 01, 2009
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent is unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety by reason of illness, or physical or mental condition, in violation of Section 458.331(1)(s), Florida Statutes (2008, 2009)1/, and if so, what penalty or restriction should be imposed?Petitioner demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent is unable to practice with reasonable skill and safety to patients by virtue of her mental condition.
08-000304PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs GINA M. DIEUDONNE, M.D.  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2008
Should discipline be imposed against Respondent's license to practice medicine for violation of Section 458.331(1)(b) and (kk), Florida Statutes (2005)?Respondent was disciplined in Illinois and did not report to Florida.
14-003507PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs PAUL M. GOLDBERG, M.D.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 25, 2014
Whether Respondent, a medical doctor, in his treatment of Patient M.A., failed to keep legible medical records in violation of section 458.331(1)(m), Florida Statutes (2007); prescribed or administered inappropriate or excessive quantities of controlled substances in violation of section 458.331(1)(q), Florida Statutes (2007); committed medical malpractice by practicing below the standard of care in violation of section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2007); failed to perform a statutory or legal obligation placed upon a licensed physician in violation of section 458.331(1)(g), Florida Statutes (2007); and violated any provision of chapter 458 or chapter 456, or any rules adopted pursuant thereto in violation of section 458.331(1)(nn), Florida Statutes (2007), as Petitioner alleges in the Third Amended Administrative Complaint; if so, whether (and what) disciplinary measures should be imposed.Petitioner established Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(g) and (nn), Florida Statutes, as charged in Counts IV and V of the Administrative Complaint.
14-001115PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs KENNETH RIVERA-KOLB, M.D.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 17, 2014
The issues in this case are whether Respondent: (1) failed to keep proper medical records; (2) committed medical malpractice; or (3) knowingly performed professional responsibilities which he knew he was not competent to perform, as set forth in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Respondent did not keep proper medical records, committed medical malpractice, and knowingly performed professional responsibilities he was not competent to perform. A fine of $20,000 and suspension of his license for a four-year period is recommended.
14-001283PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ROBERTO E. RIVERA, M.D.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 18, 2014
The issue presented is whether Respondent, Roberto Rivera, M.D. (Dr. Rivera or Respondent), violated section 458.331(1)(b) and (kk), Florida Statutes (2012), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that New Jersey took action against Respondent's New Jersey medical license, and Respondent did not report the New Jersey action to the Florida Board of Medicine.
13-003375PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD R. MARQUEZ GARCIA, M.D.  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 10, 2013
Whether Respondent, a medical doctor, practiced beyond the scope of his temporary certification and/or failed to notify the Board of Medicine of changes in employment, as Petitioner alleges; if so, whether (and what) disciplinary measures should be taken against Respondent's temporary license, which authorizes him to practice only in areas of critical need.That the Board of Medicine enter a final order imposing on Respondent a two-year suspension; a $1,000.00 administrative fine; and a one-hour lecture on the reporting requirements of a temporary certificate for practice in areas of critical need.
09-005267PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD ABRAHAM RUBINSTEIN, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(t), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor's surgery hours were excessive for cosmetic procedures; doctor recommended and scheduled unnecessary surgery; and doctor used undue influence to get patient to undergo unneccessary allergy testing.
09-005269PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD ABRAHAM RUBINSTEIN, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(t), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor's surgery hours were excessive for cosmetic procedures; doctor recommended and scheduled unnecessary surgery; and doctor used undue influence to get patient to undergo unneccessary allergy testing.
09-005270PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs LEONARD ABRAHAM RUBINSTEIN, M.D.  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2009
The issues in these cases are whether Respondent violated sections 458.331(1)(t), 458.331(1)(m), and 458.331(1)(n), Florida Statutes (2004), and section 458.331(1)(t), Florida Statutes (2006), and, if so, what discipline should be imposed.Doctor's surgery hours were excessive for cosmetic procedures; doctor recommended and scheduled unnecessary surgery; and doctor used undue influence to get patient to undergo unneccessary allergy testing.
10-010229PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ALGIRDAS KRISCIUNAS, M.D.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 16, 2010
The primary issue in this case is whether the crimes of which Respondent was convicted are directly related to the practice of medicine. If so, it will be necessary to determine an appropriate penalty.Respondent was tried, found guilty, and convicted of crimes which directly relate to the practice of medicine; accordingly, it is recommended that Petitioner revoke Respondent's license and impose a $10,000 fine.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer