Miami-Dade FL Administrative law, Construction and developme -- eLawyers

11-004156PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs ANDRES R. VILLARREAL (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2011

The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint, and if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Guilty plea to accepting unlawful compensation relates to the ability to practice contracting, in violation of s.489.129(1)(b); recommend 1 -year suspension, probation and fine. Failure to report guilty plea to licensing board warrants reprimand and fine.

11-002789 FRANCISCO VICENTE DE MOYA vs CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD (2011)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 2011

Whether a certified general contractor's license issued to Francisco Vincente De Moya (Petitioner) that has been classified null and void should be reinstated pursuant to the "hardship" provision of section 455.271(6)(b), Florida Statutes.1General contractor, who failed to renew his license, did not prove he failed to comply with renewal requirements because of illness or unusual hardship.

98-005064 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs ALLEN FADER (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 16, 1998

This is a license discipline case in which the Petitioner seeks to take disciplinary action against the Respondent on the basis of allegations of misconduct set forth in a four-count Administrative Complaint. The Administrative Complaint charges the Respondent with violation of the following statutory provisions: Sections 489.129(1)(g), 489.129(1)(h)2, 489.129(1)(k), and 489.129(1)(n), Florida Statutes (1996 Supp.).Evidence proves that contractor violated paragraphs (g), (h), (k), and (n) of Section 489.129(1), Florida Statutes. Violations warrant fines, probation, and reimbursement order.

96-004148 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs GONZALO VEGA (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 03, 1996

Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Contractor fined $1000 for violating building code by failing to get prior approval for a structure and for deviations from original plans.

97-004733 BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATORS AND INSPECTORS BOARD vs LEE MARTIN (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 1997

The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Administrative Complaint filed against him, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him, if any.Building code administrator may not be disciplined for decision which was within his discretion or for circumstances created by his predecessor.

98-003713 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs BRUCE E. ESQUINALDO (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 21, 1998

Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints dated June 3, 1998, and December 23, 1998, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Swimming pool contractor should be disciplined because the Agency proved that the company he qualified abandoned construction projects in DOAH Case Nos. 98-3713 and 99-2655. All other counts in the Administrative Complaints should be dismissed.

01-004893 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs PHILIP TAYLOR (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 24, 2001

Whether the Respondent committed the violation alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated September 25, 2001, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Department proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent engaged in the business of contracting without a license. Administrative penalty of $5,000 should be imposed.

01-003124PL DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs MANUEL RIVERO (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 01, 2001

Whether Respondent committed the offenses as set forth in the Administrative Complaint dated June 13, 2000, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Contractor disciplined for abandoning a project and failing to satisfy a judgment.

98-004859 DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs LUCIUS P. CLARK (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 29, 1998

The issue for determination is whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaints and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent assisted an unlicensed person to practice contracting, having reasonable grounds to know that the person was unlicensed. Respondent abandoned a construction project.

98-001529 CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY LICENSING BOARD vs EARL GENE BURKS (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 30, 1998

Whether the Respondent, Earl Gene Burks, committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent took deposit from customer but never completed work. Customer had to sue for judgment which was unsatisfied by licensee.

Diane Snell Perera