Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Mr. Eddie Williams III
Mr. Eddie Williams III
Visitors: 39
0
Bar #258090(FL)     License for 25 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Mr. Eddie Williams III? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

17-006655RU  DACCO BEHAVORIAL HEALTH, INC.; OPERATION PAR, INC.; AND ASPIRE PARTNERS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 11, 2017
The issue in this case is whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rule 65DER17-2 (the “Emergency Rule”) constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority as defined in section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes. (Unless specifically stated otherwise herein, all references to Florida Statutes will be to the 2017 version.) More specifically, on September 19, 2017, the Florida Department of Children and Families (the “Department”), published the Emergency Rule, which dealt with the need for and licensing of new methadone medication-assisted treatment centers for persons dealing with opioid addiction. Pursuant to the Emergency Rule, the Department decided which providers would receive approval notices to submit licensure applications in certain counties based on the order in which complete and responsive applications were received by the Department. A number of parties are challenging the validity of the Emergency Rule.The Emergency Rule constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.
20-004322  LIFESTREAM BEHAVIORAL CENTER, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2020
The issue is whether the Department’s intended award allowing Metro to proceed to licensure for a methadone Medication-Assisted Treatment (“MAT”) facility in Lake County violated Florida Administrative Code Rule 65D- 30.0141, was arbitrary or capricious, or was otherwise unlawful as alleged in LifeStream’s Petition for Administrative Hearing (“Petition”).Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the Department's action in correcting scores on a competitive application for methadone MAT services was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer