The issue in this case is whether Petitioner is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Section 57.111, Florida Statutes, and Rule 22I-6.035, Florida Administrative Code.Petitioner for attorneys fees timely 64 days/after not of voluntary dismissal;5 days for mail DPR justified filing administrative complaint based on patient complaints and supsequent Dentist report.

The issue for consideration in this matter is whether Respondent's license as a barber in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters set out in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Failure to conform to board's sanitation standards justifies penalty designed to correct violation not merely punish.

The issue is whether Petitioner, Frederick Mann, D.D.S., is entitled to an award of his appellate attorney's fees and costs pursuant to the Florida Equal Access to Justice Act, Section 57.111, Florida Statutes.Obtaining modification of final order based on material change in circumstances doesn't constitute prevailing in a proceeding initiated by st agency

The issue in this case is whether Respondent's licenses as a cosmetologist and cosmetology salon owner in the State of Florida, should be suspended, revoked or otherwise disciplined for the alleged violations of Chapter 477, Florida Statutes, set forth in the Administrative Complaint.Respondent employed cosmetologist seeking licensure by endorsement before Florida approval; $300 fine

The issue in this case is whether Dr. Giallanzo's Florida license as a chiropractic physician should be disciplined for the following violations of Chapter 460, Florida Statutes, alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint: COUNT I: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(w), Florida Statutes, by violating, Subsection 460.413(1)(bb), Florida Statutes, by submitting to a third-party (i.e., an insurer) a claim for a service or treatment without providing a copy of that claim to the insured at the same time. COUNT II: Voluntarily Dismissed. COUNT III: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(v), Florida Statutes, by delegating professional responsibilities to a person when the licensee knows, or has reason to know, that such person is not qualified by training, experience, or licensure to perform them. COUNT IV: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(1), Florida Statutes, by making misleading, deceptive, untrue or fraudulent representations in the practice of chiropractic, or employing a trick or scheme in the practice of chiropractic. COUNT V: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(g), Florida Statutes, by failing to report to the Department any person who the licensee knows has violated the chiropractic statutes or implementing rules of the department or board. COUNT VI: Voluntarily Dismissed. COUNT VII: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by failing to perform a statutory or legal obligation placed upon a licensed chiropractic physician. COUNT VIII: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(w), Florida Statutes, by violating a lawful order of the board or department which was previously entered in a disciplinary proceeding. COUNT IX: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(i), Florida Statutes, by failing to perform a statutory or legal obligation placed upon a licensed chiropractic physician. COUNT X: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(w), Florida Statutes, by violating a lawful order of the board or department which was previously entered in a disciplinary proceeding. COUNT XI: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(w), Florida Statutes, by violating Section 460.411(1)(a), Florida Statutes, by practicing or attempting to practice chiropractic without an active license. COUNT XII: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(w), Florida Statutes, by violating Section 455.227(1)(b), Florida Statutes, by intentionally violating a rule adopted by the board or the department. COUNT XIII: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(w), Florida Statutes, by violating Section 460.411(2)(d), Florida Statutes, by knowing concealment of information about his statutory violations, in that the Respondent failed to submit a patient record when presented a patient's release authorizing its delivery to a department employee. COUNT XIV: Violation of Subsection 460.413(1)(w), Florida Statutes, by violating Section 460.411(b), Florida Statutes in that the Respondent used or attempted to use a license to practice chiropractic which has been suspended or revoked.Chiropractor revoked for practice while suspended, failure to pay fines, failure to submit bill to patient when he billed third party payor

Whether Petitioner, Frank A. Brown, Ph.D., is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to the Florida Equal Access to Justice Act, Section 57.111, Florida Statutes, and Rule 22I-6.035, Florida Administrative Code.Attorney fees--reasonable basis, reliance on investigative report and other evidence--refusal to allow presence at probable cause meeting, irrelevant.

Whether Respondent committed the offenses described in the Administrative Complaint? If so, what penalty should be imposed?Respondent guilty of allowing unlicensed barbers to work in her barbership; $750 fine recom; can't consider prior owner's violations in deciding penalty

Whether Respondent committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaint and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Optician gave false response on application for licensure. Truthful response would have required additional inquiry by Board. Revocation recommended.

The issue is whether Respondent's opticianry license should be revoked or otherwise penalized based on the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint.Failure to pay fines assessed in 2 previous final orders is a failure to obey lawful orders of board. License revoked.

The issue at the hearing was whether Petitioner is entitled to an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Section 57.111, Florida Statutes, and Rule 221-6.035, Florida Administrative Code.Attorneys fees--no entitlement where petitioner is not domiciled or has no business in Florida; upheld on appeal-statute not unconstitutional