Orange FL Lawyers | Emery H Rosenbluth, Jr. -- eLawyers

74-2052 Bill L. Ballard, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. El Dorado Tire Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross (1975)

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: May 09, 1975 Citations: 512 F.2d 901

512 F.2d 901 Bill L. BALLARD, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. EL DORADO TIRE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee. No. 74-2052. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 9, 1975. Eli H. Subin, Emery H. Rosenbluth, Jr., Orlando, Fla., for defendant-appellant-cross appellee. J. Thomas Cardwell, George T. Eidson, Jr., Orlando, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee-cross appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Before TUTTLE, COLEMAN a..

Bankruptcy No. 97-04138-6J7 In Re Brown (1998)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Feb. 11, 1998 Citations: 221 B.R. 902

221 B.R. 902 (1998) In re Oren Scott BROWN, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 97-04138-6J7. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 11, 1998. *903 Robert H. Pflueger, Altamonte Springs, FL, for Debtor. George E. Mills, Jr., Orlando, FL, Trustee. Mac D. Heavener, III, Altamonte Springs, FL, for Trustee. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON DEBTOR'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS OBJECTIONS TO EXEMPTIONS KAREN S. JENNEMANN, Bankruptcy Judge. This case came on for hearing on December..

3D07-2641 Valdes v. LIFEMARK HOSPITALS OF FL, INC. (2008)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 06, 2008 Citations: 979 So. 2d 236

979 So. 2d 236 (2008) VALDES v. LIFEMARK HOSPITALS OF FL, INC. No. 3D07-2641. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 6, 2008. Decision without published opinion. App.dismissed.

O-356 William Murray Bldrs., Inc. v. City of Jacksonville (1971)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Nov. 09, 1971 Citations: 254 So. 2d 364

254 So. 2d 364 (1971) WILLIAM MURRAY BUILDERS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee. No. O-356. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. November 9, 1971. Rehearing Denied December 3, 1971. *365 Dawson, Galant, Maddox, Boyer, Sulik & Nichols and Harold B. Haimowitz, Jacksonville, for appellant. James C. Rinaman, Jr., David U. Tumin and Thomas D. Oakley, Jacksonville, for appellee. JOHNSON, Judge. Wil..

4D04-2960 OPPORTUNITY FUNDING I v. Otetchestvennyi (2005)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 2005 Citations: 909 So. 2d 361

909 So. 2d 361 (2005) OPPORTUNITY FUNDING I LLC, Appellant, v. Igor OTETCHESTVENNYI, Jane Doe, Unknown spouse of Igor Otetchestvennyi, Christine Burganov, f/k/a Christine Otetchestvennyi, Joel H. Feldman, P.A., and Unknown Tenants, Owners, Appellees. No. 4D04-2960. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 27, 2005. Rehearing Denied September 26, 2005. Clay A. Holtsinger and Shawn M. Yesner, Clearwater, for appellant. No brief filed for appellee. *362 PER CURIAM. A mortgagee appe..

2D06-3652 CARTNER v. State (2007)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 2007 Citations: 965 So. 2d 1148

965 So. 2d 1148 (2007) CARTNER v. STATE. No. 2D06-3652. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. September 21, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

92-000342BID SUNRISE COMMUNITY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 1992

Whether Respondent, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, acted fraudulently, arbitrarily, illegally or dishonestly in the selection of Salem Villages MRDD, Inc., (Salem) as the recipient of the award which is the subject of this proceeding.HRS did not act fraudently, arbitrarily, illegally or dishonestly in the selection of recipient of award of license to operate Intermediate Care for the Developmentally Disabled.

90-001519BID BRICE BLDG CO vs CANAVERAL PORT AUTHORITY (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 1990

The issue in the case is whether Respondent has improperly rejected as late the bid proposal of Petitioner.Agency not required to accept late bid even though agency representative fails to reject bid when submitted

Emery H Rosenbluth, Jr.