Elawyers Elawyers
05-002594CON  JFK MEDICAL CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A JFK MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND BETHESDA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., D/B/A BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 19, 2005
Bethesda Healthcare Systems, Inc., filed Certificate of Need Application No. 9838 with the Agency for Health Care Administration. The application seeks authority to establish an 80-bed acute care satellite hospital in the West Boynton area of south Palm Beach County. The issue in this case is whether the Agency should approve the application.Bethesda Healthcare demonstrated the need for an 80-bed satellite hospital in the West Boynton area on the basis of enhanced access to emergency services for the elderly.
05-002753CON  TENET HEALTHSYSTEM HOSPITALS, INC., D/B/A DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND BETHESDA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2005
Bethesda Healthcare Systems, Inc., filed Certificate of Need Application No. 9838 with the Agency for Health Care Administration. The application seeks authority to establish an 80-bed acute care satellite hospital in the West Boynton area of south Palm Beach County. The issue in this case is whether the Agency should approve the application.Bethesda Healthcare demonstrated the need for an 80-bed satellite hospital in the West Boynton area on the basis of enhanced access to emergency services for the elderly.
06-000555CON  BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER OF CLAY, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND ORANGE PARK MEDICAL CENTER, INC.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2006
Whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Baptist Medical Center of Clay, Inc. (Baptist Clay), St. Vincent's Medical Center, Inc. (SVMC), and Orange Park Medical Center, Inc. d/b/a Orange Park Medical Center (OPMC), for a new acute care hospital in Clay County, Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency or AHCA) acute care subdistrict 4-2, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule review criteria sufficiently to warrant approval, and, if so, which of the three applications best meets the applicable statutory and rule review criteria for approval.On balance and in this comparative review hearing, St. Vincent`s Medical Center, Inc. proved that its proposed acute care hospital in Clay County should be approved over the other two applicants.
06-000563CON  ST. VINCENT`S MEDICAL CENTER, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2006
Whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Baptist Medical Center of Clay, Inc. (Baptist Clay), St. Vincent's Medical Center, Inc. (SVMC), and Orange Park Medical Center, Inc. d/b/a Orange Park Medical Center (OPMC), for a new acute care hospital in Clay County, Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency or AHCA) acute care subdistrict 4-2, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule review criteria sufficiently to warrant approval, and, if so, which of the three applications best meets the applicable statutory and rule review criteria for approval.On balance and in this comparative review hearing, St. Vincent`s Medical Center, Inc. proved that its proposed acute care hospital in Clay County should be approved over the other two applicants.
06-000843CON  ORANGE PARK MEDICAL CENTER, INC., D/B/A ORANGE PARK MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION; BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER OF CLAY, INC.; AND ST. VINCENT`S MEDICAL CENTER, INC.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2006
Whether the Certificate of Need (CON) applications filed by Baptist Medical Center of Clay, Inc. (Baptist Clay), St. Vincent's Medical Center, Inc. (SVMC), and Orange Park Medical Center, Inc. d/b/a Orange Park Medical Center (OPMC), for a new acute care hospital in Clay County, Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency or AHCA) acute care subdistrict 4-2, satisfy, on balance, the applicable statutory and rule review criteria sufficiently to warrant approval, and, if so, which of the three applications best meets the applicable statutory and rule review criteria for approval.On balance and in this comparative review hearing, St. Vincent`s Medical Center, Inc. proved that its proposed acute care hospital in Clay County should be approved over the other two applicants.
06-000571CON  WUESTHOFF MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A WUESTHOFF MEDICAL CENTER - ROCKLEDGE AND WUESTHOFF MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A WUESTHOFF MEDICAL CENTER-MELBOURNE vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 13, 2006
The issue is whether HRMC's Certificate of Need Application No. 9881 to establish an 84-bed acute care hospital in the Viera area, Brevard County, Florida, AHCA Subdistrict 7-1, should be approved.Respondent Holmes Regional Medical Center, Inc., demonstrated its entitlement to a certificate of need to construct an 84-bed acute care hospital in Viera, Brevard County, Florida.
20-000742BID  PAYIT, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2020
Whether the decision of Respondent, the Florida Department of Financial Services (“DFS”), to award the contract contemplated in its Invitation to Negotiate No. 1819-01 ITN TR, e-Payment Collection and Processing Services, to Intervenor, NIC Services, LLC (“NIC”), is contrary to governing statutes, rules, or policies, or the solicitation specifications; if so, whether that decision was clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious; and whether Petitioner, PayIt, LLC (“PayIt”), has standing to protest DFS’s decision.Petitioner had standing to seek re-bidding based on flaws in process, but failed to prove contract award was contrary to governing statutes, rules, or ITN specifications, or was arbitrary or capricious, contrary to competition, or clearly erroneous.
21-000888CON  SEASONS HOSPICE AND PALLIATIVE CARE OF PINELLAS COUNTY, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2021)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 09, 2021
Whether there is “an error in the Fixed Need Pool numbers” for hospice as calculated by the Agency for Health Care Administration (“AHCA”) pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 59C-1.0355(4)(a), and as published by AHCA on February 5, 2021, pursuant to rule 59C-1.008(2)(a).Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that the FNP determination under challenge herein is in error. Not proper to consider "provisional" deaths data and VA hospice admissions.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer