welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Felix M Adams
Felix M Adams
Felix M Adams
Visitors: 38
2
Bar #358282(FL)     License for 42 years; Member in Good Standing
Bushnell FL

Are you Felix M Adams? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

99-003444GM  THOMAS WILEY; G. ANTHONY RISH; SAMUEL F. SLAUGHTER, III; AND LOUISE L. SLAUGHTER vs SUMTER COUNTY  (1999)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 11, 1999
The issue is whether the small scale development amendment adopted by the County by Ordinance No. 99-15 on May 11, 1999, is in compliance.Where small-scale amendment involved 10.007 acres, it exceeded the 10.00-acre statutory threshold and could not be approved.
96-005917GM  SUMTER CITIZENS AGAINST IRRESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT, T. DANIEL FARNSWORTH, ET AL. vs SUMTER COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 18, 1996
Whether Comprehensive Plan Amendment 96-2 adopted by the County on September 24, 1996, is in compliance.Data existing at time of adoption of amendment but not utilized until final hearing admissible; amendment found to be in compliance.
94-006974GM  SUMTER CITIZENS AGAINST IRRESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT, T. D. FARNSWORTH, AND JAMES E. BOYD vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND SUMTER COUNTY  (1994)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 15, 1994
The issue in this case is whether Sumter County comprehensive plan amendment 94D1 adopted on September 20, 1994, by Ordinance No. 94-6 is in compliance.County plan amendment determinied to be in compliance.
97-000658  LENARD POWELL vs JOE MARINARO, D/B/A ATLANTIC FRUIT COMPANY, AND RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 10, 1997
Whether Respondent owes Petitioner $41,783.69 as alleged in the complaint filed on December 2, 1996.Dealer held responsible for misrepresentations of his agent to grower.
92-002683GM  C. JOHN CONIGLIO PROFIT SHARING PLAN vs SUMTER COUNTY  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 30, 1992
At issue in this case is whether the comprehensive plan (plan) adopted by Sumter County (county) is "in compliance" with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code.Plan for the county in compliance in dispute over land use classification as commercial and amount of land classified for mining.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer