welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Frank E Matthews
Frank E Matthews
Frank E Matthews
Visitors: 91
0
Bar #328812(FL)     License for 44 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Frank E Matthews? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 33 CFR 64.06

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.536, 120.54, 120.542, 120.56, 120.569, 120.57, 120.573, 120.574, 120.595, 120.60, 120.68, 125.01, 187.201, 211.32, 253.03, 253.04, 253.77, 258.35, 258.36, 258.37, 258.397, 267.061, 27.40, 28.14, 30.49, 327.40, 327.41, 327.60, 337.0261, 373.016, 373.019, 373.023, 373.026, 373.036, 373.042, 373.043, 373.046, 373.069, 373.086, 373.103, 373.106, 373.114, 373.1501, 373.1502, 373.171, 373.175, 373.223, 373.246, 373.403, 373.413, 373.4135, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.416, 373.418, 373.421, 373.430, 373.453, 373.470, 378.202, 378.203, 378.205, 378.207, 378.208, 378.209, 378.212, 380.06, 403.031, 403.064, 403.087, 403.088, 403.201, 403.412, 403.813, 403.973, 6.10, 607.1106, 7.38, 7.40, 7.50, 704.06, 90.803

Florida Administrative Code: 40D-1.102, 40D-1.602, 40D-1.604, 40D-4.031, 40D-4.091, 40D-4.201, 40D-4.301, 40D-4.302, 40D-4.331, 40D-4.351, 40D-40.031, 40D-40.112, 40D-40.331, 40D-40.351, 40D-40.381, 40D-8.041, 40E-4.051, 62-302.300, 62-302.530, 62-330.200, 62-340.300, 62-340.450, 62-340.600, 62-342.470, 62-342.700, 62-343.090, 62-345.200, 62-345.300, 62-345.400, 62-345.500, 62-345.600, 62-4.242, 62-620.100, 62C-16.0021, 62C-16.0041, 62C-16.0045, 62C-16.0051, 62C-16.0075, 62C-16.0091

11-006495  FINR II, INC. vs CF INDUSTRIES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 2011
The issue is whether CF Industries, Inc. (CF), has provided reasonable assurance that its proposed mining and reclamation of the South Pasture Extension (SPE) mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that complies with applicable statutes and rules so that an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), SPE conceptual reclamation plan (CRP), South Pasture Wetland Resource Permit (WRP) Modification, and South Pasture Conceptual Reclamation Plan Modification should be issued by the Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, & WRP modifications to conduct phosphate mining and reclamation activities in Hardee County approved.
10-000016  CRP/HLV HIGHLANDS RANCH, L.L.C. vs ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2010
The issue is the number of potential mitigation bank credits that Respondent, St. Johns River Water Management District (District), should award Petitioner, CRP/HLV Highlands Ranch, LLC (Highlands Ranch), based on the application of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes,1 and the Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) contained in Florida Administrative Code Rule Chapter 62-345.2District's methodology for determining number of mitigation bank credits under Uniform Mitigated Assessment Method rule is permissible even though it differs from the methodology used by DEP.
08-003886  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003887  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003888  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003889  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-000510  OLD PELICAN BAY III ASSOCIATION, INC. vs TERRY CARLSON AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 2008
The issue is whether Terry Carlson's application to construct and install a single-family dock in Lee County, Florida, is exempt from the need for an Environmental Resource Permit.Applicant`s dock qualified for exemption from DEP permit requirements; the dock did not create navigational hazard, as claimed by Petitioner.
03-000791  PEACE RIVER/MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000792  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000804  ALAN R. BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer