welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. George Kellen Brew
George Kellen Brew
George Kellen Brew
Visitors: 54
0
Bar #854379(FL)     License for 35 years; Member in Good Standing
Jacksonville FL

Are you George Kellen Brew? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.52, 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 409.913, 456.072, 456.073, 458.331, 466.028, 57.105, 57.111, 832.05

Florida Administrative Code: 64B8-9.009

19-002901PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs CHARLOTTE GERRY, D.M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2019
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated the applicable standard of care in the practice of dentistry in violation of section 466.028(1), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed in each of the consolidated cases; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated the dental standard of performance with regard to three patients. Other allegations not proven. Recommend suspension.
19-002902PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs CHARLOTTE GERRY, D.M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2019
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated the applicable standard of care in the practice of dentistry in violation of section 466.028(1), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed in each of the consolidated cases; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated the dental standard of performance with regard to three patients. Other allegations not proven. Recommend suspension.
10-009318MPI  AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs HAL M. TOBIAS  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 28, 2010
The issue is whether Petitioner can prove Medicaid overpayments to Respondent and, if so, how much Petitioner is entitled to recoup.HCA proved overpayments to physician, primarily based on claims submitted for neural scans using an Axon II device. CMS had assigned a unique code to such procedures, rendering them ineligible for Medicaid reimbursement.
06-003707PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs RICHARD B. EDISON, M.D.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 24, 2007
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed July 7, 2006, and, if so, the penalty that should be imposed.Petitioner proved that Respondent failed to keep adequate medical records and violated the standard of care regarding the maximum dosage of Lidocaine. Recommended penalty: 90 days` suspension, four years` probation, and a $15,000 fine.
06-000598PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs RICHARD B. EDISON, M.D.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 16, 2006
The issue is whether Respondent is guilty of failing to practice in accordance with the applicable standard of care or failing to keep adequate medical records and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved that Respondent failed to keep medical records justifying the course of treatment, but not that he failed to meet the applicable standard of care in plastic surgery.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer