Madison FL Agriculture, Appeals and Banking Lawyers | George -- eLawyers

Case No. 3:08cv509-RV-EMT Rain Bird Corp. v. Taylor (2009)

District Court, N.D. Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 2009 Citations: 665 F. Supp. 2d 1258

665 F. Supp. 2d 1258 (2009) RAIN BIRD CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. Patrick TAYLOR, Individual doing business as AAA Rainbird Connection, Defendant. Case No. 3:08cv509/RV/EMT. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. October 14, 2009. *1262 Stephen Marshall Cozart, Kubicki Draper Pa, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiff. Patrick Taylor, Crestview, FL, pro se. ORDER ROGER VINSON, Senior District Judge. This cause conies on for consideration upon the magistrate..

5:98CV105SPM Carter v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida (1999)

District Court, N.D. Florida Filed: Mar. 08, 1999 Citations: 61 F. Supp. 2d 1237

61 F. Supp. 2d 1237 (1999) Denise CARTER, Plaintiff, v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC., Defendant. No. 5:98CV105SPM. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division. March 8, 1999. *1238 Frank Alfred Baker, Marianna, Florida, for plaintiff Denise Carter. W. Edward McIntyre, Bunnell Woulfe Kirschbaum Keller, Cohen & McIntyre, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. Adam Feinberg, Miller & Chevalier, Chartered, Washington, DC, fo..

Bankruptcy No. 6:05-bk-10308-KSJ, Adversary No. 6:05-ap-336 In Re Goodwin (2006)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Oct. 13, 2006 Citations: 355 B.R. 337

355 B.R. 337 (2006) In re Gary L. GOODWIN and Mary K. Goodwin, Debtors. Philip W. Hearn, John Ely, and Joseph Roberson, Plaintiffs, v. Gary Goodwin, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 6:05-bk-10308-KSJ, Adversary No. 6:05-ap-336. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. October 13, 2006. *338 *339 David L. Wildman, Melbourne, FL, for Debtors. *340 Shirley W. Ovletrea, Shirley W. Ovletrea PA, Merritt Island, FL, for Plaintiffs. MEMORANDUM OPINION ON COMPLAINT TO DETERMINE NON-DISCHAR..

14-001420RU PAUL STILL vs SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 25, 2014

The issues to be determined in this case are whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, 62-42.300, and a document incorporated by reference (“the Proposed Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority; whether the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) complied with statutory requirements regarding preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) for the Proposed Rules; and whether the approval by the Governing Board of the Suwannee River Water Management District (“SRWMD”) of a document entitled “Recovery Strategy: Lower Santa Fe River Basin” (“Recovery Strategy”) is invalid because it required rulemaking.It is concluded that proposed rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, and the Supplemental Regulatory Measures incorporated by reference in rule 62.-42.300(1)(d) are valid, but proposed rules 62-42.300(1)(a) and (b) are invalid because they are vague.

14-001421RP PAUL STILL vs SUWANNEE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 24, 2014

The issues to be determined in this case are whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, 62-42.300, and a document incorporated by reference (“the Proposed Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority; whether the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) complied with statutory requirements regarding preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) for the Proposed Rules; and whether the approval by the Governing Board of the Suwannee River Water Management District (“SRWMD”) of a document entitled “Recovery Strategy: Lower Santa Fe River Basin” (“Recovery Strategy”) is invalid because it required rulemaking.It is concluded that proposed rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, and the Supplemental Regulatory Measures incorporated by reference in rule 62.-42.300(1)(d) are valid, but proposed rules 62-42.300(1)(a) and (b) are invalid because they are vague.

14-001443RP PAUL STILL vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 27, 2014

The issues to be determined in this case are whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, 62-42.300, and a document incorporated by reference (“the Proposed Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority; whether the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) complied with statutory requirements regarding preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) for the Proposed Rules; and whether the approval by the Governing Board of the Suwannee River Water Management District (“SRWMD”) of a document entitled “Recovery Strategy: Lower Santa Fe River Basin” (“Recovery Strategy”) is invalid because it required rulemaking.It is concluded that proposed rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, and the Supplemental Regulatory Measures incorporated by reference in rule 62.-42.300(1)(d) are valid, but proposed rules 62-42.300(1)(a) and (b) are invalid because they are vague.

14-001644RP FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 11, 2014

The issues to be determined in this case are whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, 62-42.300, and a document incorporated by reference (“the Proposed Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority; whether the Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) complied with statutory requirements regarding preparation of a statement of estimated regulatory costs (“SERC”) for the Proposed Rules; and whether the approval by the Governing Board of the Suwannee River Water Management District (“SRWMD”) of a document entitled “Recovery Strategy: Lower Santa Fe River Basin” (“Recovery Strategy”) is invalid because it required rulemaking.It is concluded that proposed rules 62-42.100, 62-42.200, and the Supplemental Regulatory Measures incorporated by reference in rule 62.-42.300(1)(d) are valid, but proposed rules 62-42.300(1)(a) and (b) are invalid because they are vague.

14-005658RP PAUL STILL vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 26, 2014

The issue to be determined in these consolidated cases is whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-42.300 is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Petitioners are estopped to challenge the unchanged portions of the rule and failed to prove that the changed portions of the rule are vague.

14-006132RP KATHLEEN STILL vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 29, 2014

The issue to be determined in these consolidated cases is whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-42.300 is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Petitioners are estopped to challenge the unchanged portions of the rule and failed to prove that the changed portions of the rule are vague.

10-000998TTS MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs DR. JAMES BROWN (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 01, 2010

The issue is whether Petitioner has "just cause" to terminate Respondent's employment.Petitioner established just cause to terminate Respondent's employment as a teacher.

George Thomas Reeves