Lake FL Administrative law, Advertising and Insurance Lawyer -- eLawyers

99-005310 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 1999

The three major issues for consideration in this hearing are whether the sign structure in issue has been moved or removed from the location for which it was permitted and improperly re- erected; whether the sign in issue is being operated and maintained without the required proper state permits; and whether the sign in issue is a conforming or nonconforming structure.Sign company`s failure to place its sign at the spot for which it was permitted made it illegal and required a permit to move; it must be removed.

99-003346 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 06, 1999

With respect to DOAH Case No. 99-3345T, whether the Respondent must remove the double-faced outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to I-95, on the west side of the highway, 1.25 miles south of North Lake Boulevard, in Palm Beach County, Florida, for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Violation - Illegally Erected Sign, dated March 31, 1999. With respect to DOAH Case No. 99-3346T, whether the Respondent's permits for a double-faced outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to I-95, on the west side of the highway, 1.25 miles south of North Lake Boulevard, in Palm Beach County, Florida, and bearing permit numbers AZ346-35 and AZ347-35, should be revoked for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Violation - Maintenance of Nonconforming Signs dated March 31, 1999.Department failed to prove that sign company removed and re-erected an outdoor advertising sign. Notices of Violation should be dismissed.

99-003345 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 06, 1999

With respect to DOAH Case No. 99-3345T, whether the Respondent must remove the double-faced outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to I-95, on the west side of the highway, 1.25 miles south of North Lake Boulevard, in Palm Beach County, Florida, for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Violation - Illegally Erected Sign, dated March 31, 1999. With respect to DOAH Case No. 99-3346T, whether the Respondent's permits for a double-faced outdoor advertising sign located adjacent to I-95, on the west side of the highway, 1.25 miles south of North Lake Boulevard, in Palm Beach County, Florida, and bearing permit numbers AZ346-35 and AZ347-35, should be revoked for the reasons set forth in the Notice of Violation - Maintenance of Nonconforming Signs dated March 31, 1999.Department failed to prove that sign company removed and re-erected an outdoor advertising sign. Notices of Violation should be dismissed.

99-002106 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 05, 1999

The issue for consideration in these cases is whether the Respondent's signs must be removed because of a failure to display advertising copy for a period of 12 months or longer.Non-conforming billboards that did not display advertising for more than ten months were unlawful, could not be permitted, and must be removed.

92-006153EPP IN RE: ORLANDO UTILITIES COMM. CURTIS H. STANTON ENERGY CENTER UNIT 1 AND 2 (PA NO. 81-14B) vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 05, 1992

Jurisdiction Relinquished to sitting board after stipulation and agreed conditions settled factual disputes regarding site modification.

91-003775 NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 18, 1991

Whether Petitioner, National Advertising Company, is entitled to the issuance of a vegetation control permit for its south-facing advertising billboard located West of Interstate I-75, in Lee County, Florida.Petitioner entitled to vegetation control permit; DOT standards for interstate vague.

90-002193 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs CREATIVE MEDIA OUTDOOR ADVERTISING (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 09, 1990

The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent is entitled to a sign permit for a location on Fairbanks Avenue facing Interstate 4, and whether the sign which has been erected at that location is in violation of applicable provisions of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes.Sign violated rule since it was constructed within 500 foot of Interstate Four interchange.

82-000560 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. NATIONAL ADVERTISING COMPANY (1982)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 21, 1990

Resondent didn't include sign facing east in its application for north/south sign within 1,000 feet of it. Application initially okayed and Respondent rented space. Recommended Order: dismiss charges.

82-002185 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. LUST INDUSTRIES (1982)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 21, 1990

Respondent was not guilty of sign placement violations and sign permits should be approved.

89-001714 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. FUQUA AND DAVIS, INC. (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 20, 1989

Whether the respondents or some of them erected and maintained outdoor advertising signs in violation of Rule 14-10.006(1)(a), Florida Administrative Code, because more than two advertisements or "messages" were visible to motorists at the same location?DOT cannot regulate outdoor advertising signs on the basis of how many different messages a single billboard or ""sign face"" is thought to convey.

Gerald Seals Livingston