Leon FL and Government Lawyers | Gregory Thomas Stewart -- eLawyers

Gregory Thomas Stewart

Visitors: 106

Bar #203718(FL) License for 50 years

Tallahassee FL

Are you Gregory Thomas Stewart? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Florida Administrative Code: 18-21.004, 18-21.0051, 28-106.205, 28-106.217, 40C-2.301, 62-110.106, 62-4.242, 62-4.244, 62-610.650, 62B-36.002, 62B-41.002, 62B-41.003, 62B-41.005, 62B-41.007, 62B-41.008, 62B-49.002, 62B-49.003, 62B-49.005, 62B-49.013, 63G-1.002, 63G-1.004, 63G-1.008, 63G-1.012, 63G-1.013, 63G-1.014, 63G-1.015, 63G-1.016, 63G-1.017

19-003356 THOMAS WILSON vs U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 19, 2019

The issues to be determined are whether the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) has demonstrated its entitlement to place dredged material from the maintenance dredging of the East Pass (“East Pass” or “inlet”) entrance channel conducted pursuant to Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) Permit Modification No. 0288799-006-JN (“Permit Modification”), as amended by the DEP’s August 21, 2019, Notice of Proposed Changes to Proposed Agency Action (“Proposed Change”) in the nearshore zone east of East Pass; and whether the East Pass Inlet Management Plan (“East Pass IMP”) is an unadopted rule as described in section 120.57(1)(e), Florida Statutes.The Corps of Engineers demonstrated that spoil from the dredging of East Pass should, to be compliant with section 161.142, Florida Statutes, be placed on adjacent eroding beaches east of the inlet.

SC15-780 (2015)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 22, 2015

Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC15-780 _ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: LIMITS OR PREVENTS BARRIERS TO LOCAL SOLAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY. _ No. SC15-890 _ ADVISORY OPINION TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RE: LIMITS OR PREVENTS BARRIERS TO LOCAL SOLAR ELECTRICITY SUPPLY (FINANCIAL IMPACT STATEMENT). [October 22, 2015] PER CURIAM. The Attorney General of Florida has petitioned this Court for an advisory opinion as to the validity of a citizen initiative amendment to the Florida Constitution, ti..

SC14-1603 (2015)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 2015

Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC14-1603 _ FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellant, vs. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees. _ No. SC14-1618 _ ROBERT REYNOLDS, Appellant, vs. FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION, etc., et al., Appellees. [October 15, 2015] LABARGA, C.J. In these consolidated cases, the Florida Bankers Association (FBA) and Robert Reynolds appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit, in and for Leon County, validatin..

6:07-bk-00761-KSJ, 6:07-bk-00762-KSJ, 6:07-bk-00832-KSJ, 6:07-bk-01504-KSJ, 6:07-bk-01505-KSJ, 6:07-bk-01779-KSJ, 6:07-bk-01856-KSJ, 6:07-bk-02431-KSJ, 6:07-bk-02432-KSJ, 6:07-bk-04160-KSJ, 6:07-bk-04161-KSJ In Re Pearlman (2011)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: May 10, 2011 Citations: 450 B.R. 219

450 B.R. 219 (2011) In re Louis J. PEARLMAN, et al., Debtors. Nos. 6:07-bk-00761-KSJ, 6:07-bk-00762-KSJ, 6:07-bk-00832-KSJ, 6:07-bk-01504-KSJ, 6:07-bk-01505-KSJ, 6:07-bk-01779-KSJ, 6:07-bk-01856-KSJ, 6:07-bk-02431-KSJ, 6:07-bk-02432-KSJ, 6:07-bk-04160-KSJ, 6:07-bk-04161-KSJ. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. May 10, 2011. *220 SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING SUBSTANTIVE CONSOLIDATION OF THE JOINT DEBTORS' ESTATES [1] KAREN S. JENNEMANN, Bankruptcy Judge. N..

Bankruptcy No. 87-3826 Matter of Hamlin's Landing Joint Venture (1987)

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Sep. 08, 1987 Citations: 77 B.R. 916

77 B.R. 916 (1987) In the Matter of HAMLIN'S LANDING JOINT VENTURE, Debtor(s). Bankruptcy No. 87-3826. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 8, 1987. *917 Shirley Arcuri, Tampa, Fla., for debtor. Marsha Rydberg, Tampa, Fla., for Freedom Fed'l S & L. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM OPINION ALEXANDER L. PASKAY, Chief Judge. THIS IS a Chapter 11 case commenced on July 15, 1987, by a voluntary petition filed by Hamlin's Landing Joint Venture (Debt..

17-005082 MOORE POND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; AND OX BOTTOM MANOR COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. vs GOLDEN OAK LAND GROUP, LLC; AND LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 2017

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Leon County Development Review Committee’s preliminary conditional approval of a site and development plan for the Brookside Village Residential Subdivision is consistent with the Tallahassee-Leon County 2030 Comprehensive Plan (“Comp Plan”) and the Leon County Land Development Code (“Code”).Petitioners failed to prove the proposed residential development was inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan of Land Development Code provisions that require compatibility.

15-004711GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2015

The issue to be determined in this case is whether the Wellness Way Area Plan Map and Text Amendment to the Lake County Comprehensive Plan (“Remedial Amendment”) adopted through Lake County Ordinance No. 2016-1 is “in compliance,” as defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.

15-005278GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 18, 2015

16-000628GM CEMEX CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FLORIDA, LLC, AND LAKE LOUISA, LLC vs LAKE COUNTY (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 04, 2016

Petitioners proved beyond fair debate that the proposed comprehensive plan amendment was not "in compliance" because it lacks meaningful and predictable standards to guide development and creates internal inconsistencies.

17-002678FC MARION COUNTY, POLK COUNTY, AND SEMINOLE COUNTY vs DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 10, 2017

Determination, after remand, of an appropriate award for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by Petitioners in consolidated appeals.Final Order after Remand awarding appellants their attorneys' fees and costs incurred in the appeal pursuant to the parties' stipulation.